172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37948679)
1. Effect of surgical modification of deep brain stimulation lead trajectories on radiofrequency heating during MRI at 3T: from phantom experiments to clinical implementation.
Vu J; Bhusal B; Rosenow JM; Pilitsis J; Golestanirad L
J Neurosurg; 2024 May; 140(5):1459-1470. PubMed ID: 37948679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimizing the trajectory of deep brain stimulation leads reduces RF heating during MRI at 3 T: Characteristics and clinical translation.
Vu J; Bhusal B; Rosenow J; Pilitsis J; Golestanirad L
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2023 Jul; 2023():1-5. PubMed ID: 38083480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of Device Configuration and Patient's Body Composition on the RF Heating and Nonsusceptibility Artifact of Deep Brain Stimulation Implants During MRI at 1.5T and 3T.
Bhusal B; Nguyen BT; Sanpitak PP; Vu J; Elahi B; Rosenow J; Nolt MJ; Lopez-Rosado R; Pilitsis J; DiMarzio M; Golestanirad L
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Feb; 53(2):599-610. PubMed ID: 32860322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modifying surgical implantation of deep brain stimulation leads significantly reduces RF-induced heating during 3 T MRI.
Vu J; Bhusal B; Rosenow J; Pilitsis J; Golestanirad L
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2021 Nov; 2021():4978-4981. PubMed ID: 34892325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. RF-induced heating in tissue near bilateral DBS implants during MRI at 1.5 T and 3T: The role of surgical lead management.
Golestanirad L; Kirsch J; Bonmassar G; Downs S; Elahi B; Martin A; Iacono MI; Angelone LM; Keil B; Wald LL; Pilitsis J
Neuroimage; 2019 Jan; 184():566-576. PubMed ID: 30243973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative study of RF heating of deep brain stimulation devices in vertical vs. horizontal MRI systems.
Vu J; Bhusal B; Nguyen BT; Sanpitak P; Nowac E; Pilitsis J; Rosenow J; Golestanirad L
PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0278187. PubMed ID: 36490249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Technical Note: An anthropomorphic phantom with implanted neurostimulator for investigation of MRI safety.
Yang B; Tam F; Davidson B; Wei PS; Hamani C; Lipsman N; Chen CH; Graham SJ
Med Phys; 2020 Aug; 47(8):3745-3751. PubMed ID: 32350868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A workflow for predicting radiofrequency-induced heating around bilateral deep brain stimulation electrodes in MRI.
Zulkarnain NIH; Sadeghi-Tarakameh A; Thotland J; Harel N; Eryaman Y
Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):1007-1018. PubMed ID: 38153187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Device Configuration and Patient's Body Composition Significantly Affect RF Heating of Deep Brain Stimulation Implants During MRI: An Experimental Study at 1.5T and 3T.
Bhusal B; Nguyen BT; Vu J; Elahi B; Rosenow J; Nolt MJ; Pilitsis J; DiMarzio M; Golestanirad L
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():5192-5197. PubMed ID: 33019155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modifying the trajectory of epicardial leads can substantially reduce MRI-induced RF heating in pediatric patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device at 1.5T.
Jiang F; Bhusal B; Nguyen B; Monge M; Webster G; Kim D; Bonmassar G; Popsecu AR; Golestanirad L
Magn Reson Med; 2023 Dec; 90(6):2510-2523. PubMed ID: 37526134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reconfigurable MRI technology for low-SAR imaging of deep brain stimulation at 3T: Application in bilateral leads, fully-implanted systems, and surgically modified lead trajectories.
Kazemivalipour E; Keil B; Vali A; Rajan S; Elahi B; Atalar E; Wald LL; Rosenow J; Pilitsis J; Golestanirad L
Neuroimage; 2019 Oct; 199():18-29. PubMed ID: 31096058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reduction of magnetic resonance imaging-related heating in deep brain stimulation leads using a lead management device.
Baker KB; Tkach J; Hall JD; Nyenhuis JA; Shellock FG; Rezai AR
Neurosurgery; 2005 Oct; 57(4 Suppl):392-7; discussion 392-7. PubMed ID: 16234691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Vertical open-bore MRI scanners generate significantly less radiofrequency heating around implanted leads: A study of deep brain stimulation implants in 1.2T OASIS scanners versus 1.5T horizontal systems.
Kazemivalipour E; Bhusal B; Vu J; Lin S; Nguyen BT; Kirsch J; Nowac E; Pilitsis J; Rosenow J; Atalar E; Golestanirad L
Magn Reson Med; 2021 Sep; 86(3):1560-1572. PubMed ID: 33961301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. RF heating of deep brain stimulation implants during MRI in 1.2 T vertical scanners versus 1.5 T horizontal systems: A simulation study with realistic lead configurations.
Kazemivalipour E; Vu J; Lin S; Bhusal B; Thanh Nguyen B; Kirsch J; Elahi B; Rosenow J; Atalar E; Golestanirad L
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():6143-6146. PubMed ID: 33019373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Artifacts Can Be Deceiving: The Actual Location of Deep Brain Stimulation Electrodes Differs from the Artifact Seen on Magnetic Resonance Images.
Nuzov NB; Bhusal B; Henry KR; Jiang F; Vu J; Rosenow JM; Pilitsis JG; Elahi B; Golestanirad L
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg; 2023; 101(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 36529124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A workflow for predicting temperature increase at the electrical contacts of deep brain stimulation electrodes undergoing MRI.
Sadeghi-Tarakameh A; Zulkarnain NIH; He X; Atalar E; Harel N; Eryaman Y
Magn Reson Med; 2022 Nov; 88(5):2311-2325. PubMed ID: 35781696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 3-Tesla MRI of deep brain stimulation patients: safety assessment of coils and pulse sequences.
Boutet A; Hancu I; Saha U; Crawley A; Xu DS; Ranjan M; Hlasny E; Chen R; Foltz W; Sammartino F; Coblentz A; Kucharczyk W; Lozano AM
J Neurosurg; 2019 Feb; 132(2):586-594. PubMed ID: 30797197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient's body composition can significantly affect RF power deposition in the tissue around DBS implants: ramifications for lead management strategies and MRI field-shaping techniques.
Bhusal B; Keil B; Rosenow J; Kazemivalipour E; Golestanirad L
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Jan; 66(1):015008. PubMed ID: 33238247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Numerical Simulations of Realistic Lead Trajectories and an Experimental Verification Support the Efficacy of Parallel Radiofrequency Transmission to Reduce Heating of Deep Brain Stimulation Implants during MRI.
McElcheran CE; Golestanirad L; Iacono MI; Wei PS; Yang B; Anderson KJT; Bonmassar G; Graham SJ
Sci Rep; 2019 Feb; 9(1):2124. PubMed ID: 30765724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Local SAR near deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes at 64 and 127 MHz: A simulation study of the effect of extracranial loops.
Golestanirad L; Angelone LM; Iacono MI; Katnani H; Wald LL; Bonmassar G
Magn Reson Med; 2017 Oct; 78(4):1558-1565. PubMed ID: 27797157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
