These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37948848)
1. Minimal adverse events occur when inducing emesis with apomorphine in brachycephalic, mesocephalic, and dolichocephalic dogs. Harkins AE; Iswara AT; Jackson KA; Low JWL; Napier EC; Hickey MC J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2024 Mar; 262(3):1-5. PubMed ID: 37948848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Retrospective evaluation of the induction of emesis with apomorphine as treatment for gastric foreign bodies in dogs (2010-2014): 61 cases. Zersen KM; Peterson N; Bergman PJ J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio); 2020 Mar; 30(2):209-212. PubMed ID: 32077200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ropinirole has similar efficacy to apomorphine for induction of emesis and removal of foreign and toxic gastric material in dogs. Rosenstein NA; Johnson JA; Kirchofer KS J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2023 Aug; 261(8):1140-1146. PubMed ID: 37072118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy of intravenous administration of apomorphine for removal of gastric foreign material in dogs: 495 cases (2010-2015). Kirchofer KS; Block G; Johnson JA J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2019 Aug; 255(4):459-465. PubMed ID: 31355726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of subcutaneous versus intravenous administration of apomorphine for induction of emesis in dogs. Fischer C; Drobatz KJ; Thawley VJ J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2021 Aug; 259(3):283-287. PubMed ID: 34242075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of abdominal thrusts is associated with improved rates of successful emesis induction in dogs. Chan TT; Gonzalez AL; Lyons BM J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2024 Jul; 262(7):924-927. PubMed ID: 38608663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Induction of emesis with apomorphine using a novel gingival administration method in dogs. Eurell TE; Peacock RE J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio); 2021 Nov; 31(6):795-799. PubMed ID: 34433235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effectiveness and adverse effects of the use of apomorphine and 3% hydrogen peroxide solution to induce emesis in dogs. Khan SA; McLean MK; Slater M; Hansen S; Zawistowski S J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2012 Nov; 241(9):1179-84. PubMed ID: 23078563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Safety and efficacy of an ocular insert for apomorphine-induced emesis in dogs. Cote DD; Collins DM; Burczynski FJ Am J Vet Res; 2008 Oct; 69(10):1360-5. PubMed ID: 18828696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk of anesthesia-related complications in brachycephalic dogs. Gruenheid M; Aarnes TK; McLoughlin MA; Simpson EM; Mathys DA; Mollenkopf DF; Wittum TE J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2018 Aug; 253(3):301-306. PubMed ID: 30020004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Arterial blood gas measurements are different for brachycephalic and nonbrachycephalic dogs acclimatized to an altitude of 1,535 meters. Talbot CT; Zersen KM; Poon B; Santangelo KS; Moore AR; Cavanagh AA Am J Vet Res; 2024 Apr; 85(4):. PubMed ID: 38320399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Apomorphine-induced emesis in the dog--routes of administration, efficacy and synergism by naloxone. Scherkl R; Hashem A; Frey HH J Vet Pharmacol Ther; 1990 Jun; 13(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 2384906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of dexmedetomidine and other agents for emesis induction in cats: 43 cases (2009-2014). Thawley VJ; Drobatz KJ J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2015 Dec; 247(12):1415-8. PubMed ID: 26642137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of the effect of propofol and alfaxalone on laryngeal motion in nonbrachycephalic and brachycephalic dogs. Norgate D; Ter Haar G; Kulendra N; Veres-Nyéki KO Vet Anaesth Analg; 2018 Nov; 45(6):729-736. PubMed ID: 30316695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of computational fluid dynamics to compare upper airway pressures and airflow resistance in brachycephalic, mesocephalic, and dolichocephalic dogs. Fernández-Parra R; Pey P; Zilberstein L; Malvè M Vet J; 2019 Nov; 253():105392. PubMed ID: 31685131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of three preclinical models for nausea and vomiting assessment. Goineau S; Castagné V J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2016; 82():45-53. PubMed ID: 27477617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anesthetic risk during subsequent anesthetic events in brachycephalic dogs that have undergone corrective airway surgery: 45 cases (2007-2019). Doyle CR; Aarnes TK; Ballash GA; Wendt-Hornickle EL; Baldo CF; Johnson RA; Wittum TE; McLoughlin MA J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2020 Oct; 257(7):744-749. PubMed ID: 32955391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of aerodigestive disease and diagnosis of sliding hiatal hernia in brachycephalic and nonbrachycephalic dogs. Luciani E; Reinero C; Grobman M J Vet Intern Med; 2022 Jul; 36(4):1229-1236. PubMed ID: 35789042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. COMPARISON BETWEEN COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE MIDDLE EAR IN NONBRACHYCEPHALIC AND BRACHYCEPHALIC DOGS WITH OBSTRUCTIVE AIRWAY SYNDROME. Salgüero R; Herrtage M; Holmes M; Mannion P; Ladlow J Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2016; 57(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 26765680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of olfactory bulb angle and soft palate dimensions in brachycephalic and nonbrachycephalic dogs. Barker DA; Rubiños C; Taeymans O; Demetriou JL Am J Vet Res; 2018 Feb; 79(2):170-176. PubMed ID: 29359973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]