These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37948876)

  • 1. Defining and 'diagnosing' aphantasia: Condition or individual difference?
    Blomkvist A; Marks DF
    Cortex; 2023 Dec; 169():220-234. PubMed ID: 37948876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diversity of aphantasia revealed by multiple assessments of visual imagery, multisensory imagery, and cognitive style.
    Takahashi J; Saito G; Omura K; Yasunaga D; Sugimura S; Sakamoto S; Horikawa T; Gyoba J
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1174873. PubMed ID: 37546458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The blind mind: No sensory visual imagery in aphantasia.
    Keogh R; Pearson J
    Cortex; 2018 Aug; 105():53-60. PubMed ID: 29175093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Revisiting the blind mind: Still no evidence for sensory visual imagery in individuals with aphantasia.
    Keogh R; Pearson J
    Neurosci Res; 2024 Apr; 201():27-30. PubMed ID: 38311033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Only minimal differences between individuals with congenital aphantasia and those with typical imagery on neuropsychological tasks that involve imagery.
    Pounder Z; Jacob J; Evans S; Loveday C; Eardley AF; Silvanto J
    Cortex; 2022 Mar; 148():180-192. PubMed ID: 35180481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The prevalence of aphantasia (imagery weakness) in the general population.
    Dance CJ; Ipser A; Simner J
    Conscious Cogn; 2022 Jan; 97():103243. PubMed ID: 34872033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing aphantasia prevalence and the relation of self-reported imagery abilities and memory task performance.
    Beran MJ; James BT; French K; Haseltine EL; Kleider-Offutt HM
    Conscious Cogn; 2023 Aug; 113():103548. PubMed ID: 37451040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multisensory subtypes of aphantasia: Mental imagery as supramodal perception in reverse.
    Dawes AJ; Keogh R; Pearson J
    Neurosci Res; 2024 Apr; 201():50-59. PubMed ID: 38029861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Aphantasia and involuntary imagery.
    Krempel R; Monzel M
    Conscious Cogn; 2024 Apr; 120():103679. PubMed ID: 38564857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Probing the unimaginable: The impact of aphantasia on distinct domains of visual mental imagery and visual perception.
    Liu J; Bartolomeo P
    Cortex; 2023 Sep; 166():338-347. PubMed ID: 37481856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Behavioral and Neural Signatures of Visual Imagery Vividness Extremes: Aphantasia versus Hyperphantasia.
    Milton F; Fulford J; Dance C; Gaddum J; Heuerman-Williamson B; Jones K; Knight KF; MacKisack M; Winlove C; Zeman A
    Cereb Cortex Commun; 2021; 2(2):tgab035. PubMed ID: 34296179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is visual imagery ability higher for orthodontic students than those in other disciplines? A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study.
    Smyth RS; Acharya P; Hunt NP
    J Orthod; 2019 Sep; 46(3):205-211. PubMed ID: 31117869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantifying aphantasia through drawing: Those without visual imagery show deficits in object but not spatial memory.
    Bainbridge WA; Pounder Z; Eardley AF; Baker CI
    Cortex; 2021 Feb; 135():159-172. PubMed ID: 33383478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Phantasia-The psychological significance of lifelong visual imagery vividness extremes.
    Zeman A; Milton F; Della Sala S; Dewar M; Frayling T; Gaddum J; Hattersley A; Heuerman-Williamson B; Jones K; MacKisack M; Winlove C
    Cortex; 2020 Sep; 130():426-440. PubMed ID: 32446532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phantasia, aphantasia, and hyperphantasia: Empirical data and conceptual considerations.
    Larner AJ; Leff AP; Nachev PC
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2024 Sep; 164():105819. PubMed ID: 39032843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Internal consistency and construct validity of two versions of the Revised Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire.
    Campos A
    Percept Mot Skills; 2011 Oct; 113(2):454-60. PubMed ID: 22185060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Aphantasia and autism: An investigation of mental imagery vividness.
    King R; Buxton H; Tyndall I
    Conscious Cogn; 2024 Oct; 125():103749. PubMed ID: 39243493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Aphantasia and hyperphantasia: exploring imagery vividness extremes.
    Zeman A
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2024 May; 28(5):467-480. PubMed ID: 38548492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Aphantasia: The science of visual imagery extremes.
    Keogh R; Pearson J; Zeman A
    Handb Clin Neurol; 2021; 178():277-296. PubMed ID: 33832681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Ganzflicker experience: High probability of seeing vivid and complex pseudo-hallucinations with imagery but not aphantasia.
    Königsmark VT; Bergmann J; Reeder RR
    Cortex; 2021 Aug; 141():522-534. PubMed ID: 34172274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.