These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37949010)

  • 1. Conducting ethical misinformation research: Deception, dialogue, and debriefing.
    Murphy G; Greene CM
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2023 Dec; 54():101713. PubMed ID: 37949010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What happens after debriefing? The effectiveness and benefits of postexperimental debriefing.
    Greenspan RL; Loftus EF
    Mem Cognit; 2022 May; 50(4):696-709. PubMed ID: 34374927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Debriefing and accountability in deceptive research.
    Miller FG; Gluck JP; Wendler D
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2008 Sep; 18(3):235-51. PubMed ID: 18935922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Informed Consent and Debriefing When Deceiving Participants: A Systematic Review of Research Ethics Guidelines.
    Verbeke K; Krawczyk T; Baeyens D; Piasecki J; Borry P
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2023 Jul; 18(3):118-133. PubMed ID: 37186795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Deception research involving children: ethical practices and paradoxes.
    Fisher CB
    Ethics Behav; 2005; 15(3):271-87. PubMed ID: 16523564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Debriefing works: Successful retraction of misinformation following a fake news study.
    Greene CM; Murphy G
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(1):e0280295. PubMed ID: 36662686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Internet research: an opportunity to revisit classic ethical problems in behavioral research.
    Pittenger DJ
    Ethics Behav; 2003; 13(1):45-60. PubMed ID: 14552304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A confederate's perspective on deception.
    Oliansky A
    Ethics Behav; 1991; 1(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 11651141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Some perspectives on ethical/political issues in social science research.
    Smith MB
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 1976; 2(4):445-53. PubMed ID: 11661365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Deception in research: distinctions and solutions from the perspective of utilitarianism.
    Pittenger DJ
    Ethics Behav; 2002; 12(2):117-42. PubMed ID: 12956136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gurus and Griots: Revisiting the research informed consent process in rural African contexts.
    Appiah R
    BMC Med Ethics; 2021 Jul; 22(1):98. PubMed ID: 34301252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Views of US researchers about informed consent in international collaborative research.
    Dawson L; Kass NE
    Soc Sci Med; 2005 Sep; 61(6):1211-22. PubMed ID: 15970232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The case for deception in medical experimentation.
    Newell JD
    Philos Context; 1984; 14():51-9. PubMed ID: 11651861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What a tangled web we weave: ethical and legal implications of deception in recruitment.
    Pierce R
    Account Res; 2008; 15(4):262-82. PubMed ID: 18972266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experiments to answer questions raised by the use of deception in psychological research. I. Role playing as an alternative to deception. II. Effectiveness of debriefing after a deception. 3. Effect of informed consent on deception.
    Holmes DS; Bennett DH
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1974 Mar; 29(3):358-67. PubMed ID: 4814125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Deception in medical and behavioral research: is it ever acceptable?
    Wendler D
    Milbank Q; 1996; 74(1):87-114. PubMed ID: 8596525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Framework and Practical Guidance for the Ethical Use of Electronic Methods for Communication With Participants in Medical Research.
    Kogetsu A; Kato K
    J Med Internet Res; 2022 Apr; 24(4):e33167. PubMed ID: 35442208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are open-Label Placebos Ethical? Informed Consent and Ethical Equivocations.
    Blease C; Colloca L; Kaptchuk TJ
    Bioethics; 2016 Jul; 30(6):407-14. PubMed ID: 26840547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ethical research with participants who are deaf.
    Dixon R
    Bull Med Ethics; 2005 Apr; (207):13-9. PubMed ID: 17115491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ethical consideration of the research proposal and the informed-consent process: An online survey of researchers and ethics committee members in Thailand.
    Kaewkungwal J; Adams P
    Account Res; 2019 Apr; 26(3):176-197. PubMed ID: 30987450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.