These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37949519)

  • 1. Anastomotic leakage and functional outcomes following total mesorectal excision with delayed and immediate colo-anal anastomosis for rectal cancer: Two single-arm phase II trials.
    Evrard S; Bellera C; Desolneux G; Cantarel C; Toulza E; Faucheron JL; Rivoire M; Dupré A; Mabrut JY; Bresler L; Marchal F; Bouriez D; Rullier E
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2023 Nov; 49(11):107015. PubMed ID: 37949519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision With Delayed Coloanal Anastomosis (TaTME-DCAA) Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision (LTME) and Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision (RTME) for Low Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Short-term Outcomes, Bowel Function, and Cost.
    Seow-En I; Wu J; Tan IE; Zhao Y; Seah AWM; Wee IJY; Ying-Ru Ng Y; Kwong-Wei Tan E
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2024 Feb; 34(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 37987634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surgical outcomes of Turnbull-Cutait delayed coloanal anastomosis with pull-through versus immediate coloanal anastomosis with diverting stoma after total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    La Raja C; Foppa C; Maroli A; Kontovounisios C; Ben David N; Carvello M; Spinelli A
    Tech Coloproctol; 2022 Aug; 26(8):603-613. PubMed ID: 35344150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Delayed pull-through coloanal anastomosis without temporary stoma: an alternative to the standard manual side-to-end coloanal anastomosis with temporary stoma? A comparative study in 223 patients with low rectal cancer.
    Melka D; Leiritz E; Labiad C; Blondeau M; Frontali A; Giacca M; Monsinjon M; Panis Y
    Colorectal Dis; 2022 May; 24(5):587-593. PubMed ID: 35094470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laparoscopic delayed coloanal anastomosis without diverting ileostomy for low rectal cancer surgery: 85 consecutive patients from a single institution.
    Sage PY; Trilling B; Waroquet PA; Voirin D; Girard E; Faucheron JL
    Tech Coloproctol; 2018 Jul; 22(7):511-518. PubMed ID: 30027493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-effectiveness comparison of delayed versus immediate coloanal anastomosis following ultralow anterior resection for rectal cancer.
    Shannon NB; Seow-En I; Tan EK
    ANZ J Surg; 2023 Apr; 93(4):963-969. PubMed ID: 36358002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A phase III randomized trial evaluating the quality of life impact of a tailored versus systematic use of defunctioning ileostomy following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer-GRECCAR 17 trial protocol.
    Denost Q; Sylla D; Fleming C; Maillou-Martinaud H; Preaubert-Hayes N; Benard A;
    Colorectal Dis; 2023 Mar; 25(3):443-452. PubMed ID: 36413078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of a diverting ileostomy in total mesorectal excision with primary anastomosis for rectal cancer.
    Hol JC; Burghgraef TA; Rutgers MLW; Crolla RMPH; van Geloven AAW; de Jong GM; Hompes R; Leijtens JWA; Polat F; Pronk A; Smits AB; Tuynman JB; Verdaasdonk EGG; Consten ECJ; Sietses C
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Mar; 37(3):1916-1932. PubMed ID: 36258000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transanal total mesorectal excision and delayed coloanal anastomosis without stoma for low rectal cancer.
    Seow-En I; Ng YY; Tan IBH; Tan EK
    Tech Coloproctol; 2023 Jan; 27(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 36029385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ileostomy versus colostomy: impact on functional outcomes after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
    Martellucci J; Balestri R; Brusciano L; Iacopini V; Puccini M; Docimo L; Cianchi F; Buccianti P; Prosperi P
    Colorectal Dis; 2023 Aug; 25(8):1686-1693. PubMed ID: 37461265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Morbidity and costs of diverting ileostomy in transanal total mesorectal excision with primary anastomosis for rectal cancer.
    Hol JC; Bakker F; van Heek NT; de Jong GM; Kruyt FM; Sietses C
    Tech Coloproctol; 2021 Oct; 25(10):1133-1141. PubMed ID: 34296351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Delayed Colo-anal Anastomosis for Rectal Cancer: Pelvic Morbidity, Functional Results and Oncological Outcomes: A Systematic Review.
    Portale G; Popesc GO; Parotto M; Cavallin F
    World J Surg; 2019 May; 43(5):1360-1369. PubMed ID: 30690655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term functional results and quality of life after redo rectal surgery: delayed versus immediate colo-anal anastomosis.
    Boullenois H; Lefevre JH; Creavin B; Voron T; Debove C; Chafai N; Parc Y
    Colorectal Dis; 2020 Aug; 22(8):885-893. PubMed ID: 31976608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Persistent Asymptomatic Anastomotic Leakage After Laparoscopic Sphincter-Saving Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Can Diverting Stoma Be Reversed Safely at 6 Months?
    Hain E; Maggiori L; Manceau G; Zappa M; Prost à la Denise J; Panis Y
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 May; 59(5):369-76. PubMed ID: 27050598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Safety and prognosis analysis of transanal total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic mesorectal excision for mid-low rectal cancer].
    Sun R; Cong L; Qiu HZ; Lin GL; Wu B; Niu BZ; Sun XY; Zhou JL; Xu L; Lu JY; Xiao Y
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 25(6):522-530. PubMed ID: 35754217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diverting ileostomy in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: high price of protection.
    Ihnát P; Guňková P; Peteja M; Vávra P; Pelikán A; Zonča P
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Nov; 30(11):4809-4816. PubMed ID: 26902615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of diverting ileostomy in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
    Karahasanoglu T; Hamzaoglu I; Baca B; Aytac E; Erenler I; Erdamar S
    Asian J Surg; 2011 Apr; 34(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 21723468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of an institutional change from routine to highly selective diversion of a low anastomosis after TME for rectal cancer.
    Blok RD; Stam R; Westerduin E; Borstlap WAA; Hompes R; Bemelman WA; Tanis PJ
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1220-1225. PubMed ID: 29685761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surgical management and long-term functional outcomes after anastomotic leak in patients undergoing minimally invasive restorative rectal resection and without a diverting ileostomy.
    McGiffin T; Clark DA; Edmundson A; Steffens D; Stevenson A; Solomon M
    ANZ J Surg; 2022 Apr; 92(4):806-812. PubMed ID: 35072326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (L-TME) for rectal cancer surgery: does elective diverting ileostomy really protect? An observational retrospective cohort study.
    Coppola A; La Vaccara V; Cascone C; Farolfi T; Carbone L; Greco C; Ramella S; Ciccozzi M; Angeletti S; Coppola R; Caputo D
    Ann Ital Chir; 2021 Dec; 92():. PubMed ID: 35642649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.