These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37950537)
1. Single implant retained overdentures: Evaluation of effect of implant length and diameter on stress distribution by finite element analysis. Eraslan R; Yagci F; Esim E J Prosthodont; 2024 Apr; 33(4):348-357. PubMed ID: 37950537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical behavior of mandibular overdenture retained by two standard implants or 2 mini implants: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Patil PG; Seow LL; Uddanwadikar R; Ukey PD J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):138.e1-138.e8. PubMed ID: 33393474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanics of Different Types of PEEK as Implant Materials for Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures. Hassan NA; Elkhadem AH; Elkerdawy MW; Osman RB Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2022 May; 30(2):113-120. PubMed ID: 34304396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stress analysis at bone-implant interface of single- and two-implant-retained mandibular overdenture using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Lahoti K; Pathrabe A; Gade J Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(6):597-601. PubMed ID: 28169256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of four-implants supported mandibular overdentures using two different attachments]. Jiang MY; Wen J; Xu SS; Liu TS; Sun HQ Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 30630258 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical behavior of 2-implant- and single-implant-retained mandibular overdentures with conventional or mini implants. Pisani MX; Presotto AGC; Mesquita MF; Barão VAR; Kemmoku DT; Del Bel Cury AA J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):421-430. PubMed ID: 29703669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of implant distribution on the biomechanical behaviors of mandibular implant-retained overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Liao X; Cao R; Zhong J; Chen C; Pan S BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):405. PubMed ID: 38555452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of implant number on the biomechanical behaviour of mandibular implant-retained/supported overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Liu J; Pan S; Dong J; Mo Z; Fan Y; Feng H J Dent; 2013 Mar; 41(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 23160036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Stress Distribution on Mandibular Implant-Supported Overdentures With Different Bone Heights and Attachment Types: A 3D Finite Element Analysis. Unsal GS; Erbasar GNH; Aykent F; Ozyilmaz OY; Ozdogan MS J Oral Implantol; 2019 Oct; 45(5):363-370. PubMed ID: 31536445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Different implant diameters and their effect on stress distribution pattern in 2-implant mandibular overdentures: A 3D finite element analysis study. Patil PG; Seow LL; Uddanwadikar R; Pau A; Ukey PD J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; 131(4):675-682. PubMed ID: 35667890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanics of 3-implant-supported and 4-implant-supported mandibular screw-retained prostheses: A 3D finite element analysis study. Elsayyad AA; Abbas NA; AbdelNabi NM; Osman RB J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jul; 124(1):68.e1-68.e10. PubMed ID: 32199642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of bone mass density and alveolar bone resorption on stress in implant restoration of free-end edentulous posterior mandible: Finite element analysis of double-factor sensitivity. Ye Z; Ye H; Wu Y; Jiang Z; Yao H; Xu X; Zhang Y; Du W; Li W; Zheng Y; Ye P; Ding X; Wu L Ann Anat; 2024 Apr; 253():152210. PubMed ID: 38244942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stress distribution of single-implant-retained overdenture reinforced with a framework: A finite element analysis study. Amaral CF; Gomes RS; Rodrigues Garcia RCM; Del Bel Cury AA J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May; 119(5):791-796. PubMed ID: 28965674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of specific retention biomaterials for ball attachment on the biomechanical response of single implant-supported overdenture: A finite element analysis. Gibreel M; Sameh A; Hegazy S; Närhi TO; Vallittu PK; Perea-Lowery L J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Oct; 122():104653. PubMed ID: 34229172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Static and dynamic stress analysis of different crown materials on a titanium base abutment in an implant-supported single crown: a 3D finite element analysis. Deste Gökay G; Oyar P; Gökçimen G; Durkan R BMC Oral Health; 2024 May; 24(1):545. PubMed ID: 38730391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of diameter, length and elastic modulus of a dental implant on stress and strain levels in peri-implant bone: A 3D finite element analysis. Robau-Porrua A; Pérez-Rodríguez Y; Soris-Rodríguez LM; Pérez-Acosta O; González JE Biomed Mater Eng; 2020; 30(5-6):541-558. PubMed ID: 31903978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of different designs of implant-retained overdentures and fixed full-arch implant-supported prosthesis on stress distribution in edentulous mandible--a computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis. Barão VA; Delben JA; Lima J; Cabral T; Assunção WG J Biomech; 2013 Apr; 46(7):1312-20. PubMed ID: 23518207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical Comparison of Different Implant Inclinations and Cantilever Lengths in All-on-4 Treatment Concept by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis. Ozan O; Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 29340344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Finite Element Analysis of Stress Distributions for Mandibular Dental Implant-Supported Overdentures with Magnetic Attachments in Osteoporotic and Normal Bone. Hu F; Zhang L; Zhang J; Zheng Y; Li Y; Zhang X; Song L Int J Prosthodont; 2024 Feb; 37(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 38381984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]