128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37951393)
1. Interpretable machine learning for the identification of estrogen receptor agonists, antagonists, and binders.
Piir G; Sild S; Maran U
Chemosphere; 2024 Jan; 347():140671. PubMed ID: 37951393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Binary and multi-class classification for androgen receptor agonists, antagonists and binders.
Piir G; Sild S; Maran U
Chemosphere; 2021 Jan; 262():128313. PubMed ID: 33182081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Competitive molecular docking approach for predicting estrogen receptor subtype α agonists and antagonists.
Ng HW; Zhang W; Shu M; Luo H; Ge W; Perkins R; Tong W; Hong H
BMC Bioinformatics; 2014; 15 Suppl 11(Suppl 11):S4. PubMed ID: 25349983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identification of active and inactive agonists/antagonists of estrogen receptor based on Tox21 10K compound library: Binomial analysis and structure alert.
Wang J; Huang Y; Wang S; Yang Y; He J; Li C; Zhao YH; Martyniuk CJ
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2021 May; 214():112114. PubMed ID: 33711575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Binary classification of a large collection of environmental chemicals from estrogen receptor assays by quantitative structure-activity relationship and machine learning methods.
Zang Q; Rotroff DM; Judson RS
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Dec; 53(12):3244-61. PubMed ID: 24279462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A ternary classification using machine learning methods of distinct estrogen receptor activities within a large collection of environmental chemicals.
Zhang Q; Yan L; Wu Y; Ji L; Chen Y; Zhao M; Dong X
Sci Total Environ; 2017 Feb; 580():1268-1275. PubMed ID: 28011018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The importance of molecular structures, endpoints' values, and predictivity parameters in QSAR research: QSAR analysis of a series of estrogen receptor binders.
Li J; Gramatica P
Mol Divers; 2010 Nov; 14(4):687-96. PubMed ID: 19921452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In silico identification and pharmacological evaluation of novel endocrine disrupting chemicals that act via the ligand-binding domain of the estrogen receptor α.
McRobb FM; Kufareva I; Abagyan R
Toxicol Sci; 2014 Sep; 141(1):188-97. PubMed ID: 24928891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of OASIS QSAR Models Using ToxCast™ in Vitro Estrogen and Androgen Receptor Binding Data and Application in an Integrated Endocrine Screening Approach.
Bhhatarai B; Wilson DM; Price PS; Marty S; Parks AK; Carney E
Environ Health Perspect; 2016 Sep; 124(9):1453-61. PubMed ID: 27152837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Determining the endocrine disruption potential of industrial chemicals using an integrative approach: Public databases, in vitro exposure, and modeling receptor interactions.
Alofe O; Kisanga E; Inayat-Hussain SH; Fukumura M; Garcia-Milian R; Perera L; Vasiliou V; Whirledge S
Environ Int; 2019 Oct; 131():104969. PubMed ID: 31310931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computational analysis of the ToxCast estrogen receptor agonist assays to predict vitellogenin induction by chemicals in male fish.
Dreier DA; Denslow ND; Martyniuk CJ
Environ Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Jul; 53():177-183. PubMed ID: 28645054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development of QSAR models for predicting the binding affinity of endocrine disrupting chemicals to eight fish estrogen receptor.
He J; Peng T; Yang X; Liu H
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2018 Feb; 148():211-219. PubMed ID: 29055205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Classification and virtual screening of androgen receptor antagonists.
Li J; Gramatica P
J Chem Inf Model; 2010 May; 50(5):861-74. PubMed ID: 20405856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Classification of estrogenic compounds by coupling high content analysis and machine learning algorithms.
Mukherjee R; Beykal B; Szafran AT; Onel M; Stossi F; Mancini MG; Lloyd D; Wright FA; Zhou L; Mancini MA; Pistikopoulos EN
PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Sep; 16(9):e1008191. PubMed ID: 32970665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. AroER tri-screen is a biologically relevant assay for endocrine disrupting chemicals modulating the activity of aromatase and/or the estrogen receptor.
Chen S; Zhou D; Hsin LY; Kanaya N; Wong C; Yip R; Sakamuru S; Xia M; Yuan YC; Witt K; Teng C
Toxicol Sci; 2014 May; 139(1):198-209. PubMed ID: 24496634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. EDC-Predictor: A Novel Strategy for Prediction of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals by Integrating Pharmacological and Toxicological Profiles.
Yu Z; Wu Z; Zhou M; Cao K; Li W; Liu G; Tang Y
Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Nov; 57(46):18013-18025. PubMed ID: 37053516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Integral assessment of estrogenic potentials in sediment-associated samples: Part 2: Study of estrogen and anti-estrogen receptor-binding potentials of sediment-associated chemicals under different salinity conditions using the salinity-adapted enzyme-linked receptor assay.
Kase R; Hansen PD; Fischer B; Manz W; Heininger P; Reifferscheid G
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2009 Jan; 16(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 19011916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. QSAR classification of estrogen receptor binders and pre-screening of potential pleiotropic EDCs.
Li J; Gramatica P
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2010 Oct; 21(7-8):657-69. PubMed ID: 21120754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Toxicity Prediction Tool for Potential Agonist/Antagonist Activities in Molecular Initiating Events Based on Chemical Structures.
Kurosaki K; Wu R; Uesawa Y
Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Oct; 21(21):. PubMed ID: 33113912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictive modeling of estrogen receptor agonism, antagonism, and binding activities using machine- and deep-learning approaches.
Ciallella HL; Russo DP; Aleksunes LM; Grimm FA; Zhu H
Lab Invest; 2021 Apr; 101(4):490-502. PubMed ID: 32778734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
