124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37951526)
1. The use of sterol profiles, supported with other faecal source tracking methods, to apportion septic tanks contamination in rural catchments.
Dubber D; Brophy L; O'Connell D; Behan P; Danaher M; Evans C; Geary P; Misstear B; Gill L
Environ Pollut; 2024 Jan; 341():122884. PubMed ID: 37951526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Suitability of fluorescent whitening compounds (FWCs) as indicators of human faecal contamination from septic tanks in rural catchments.
Dubber D; Gill LW
Water Res; 2017 Dec; 127():104-117. PubMed ID: 29035764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An assessment of contamination fingerprinting techniques for determining the impact of domestic wastewater treatment systems on private well supplies.
Fennell C; Misstear B; O'Connell D; Dubber D; Behan P; Danaher M; Moloney M; Gill L
Environ Pollut; 2021 Jan; 268(Pt B):115687. PubMed ID: 33032246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Potential tracers for tracking septic tank effluent discharges in watercourses.
Richards S; Withers PJA; Paterson E; McRoberts CW; Stutter M
Environ Pollut; 2017 Sep; 228():245-255. PubMed ID: 28550797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Identifying avian sources of faecal contamination using sterol analysis.
Devane ML; Wood D; Chappell A; Robson B; Webster-Brown J; Gilpin BJ
Environ Monit Assess; 2015 Oct; 187(10):625. PubMed ID: 26370196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The use of chemical and molecular microbial indicators for faecal source identification.
Gilpin B; James T; Nourozi F; Saunders D; Scholes P; Savill M
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(3):39-43. PubMed ID: 12639003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identification of the source of faecal pollution in contaminated rivers.
Glipin BJ; Gregor JE; Savill MG
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(3):9-15. PubMed ID: 12227609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bacterial source tracking from diverse land use catchments by sterol ratios.
Shah VG; Hugh Dunstan R; Geary PM; Coombes P; Roberts TK; Rothkirch T
Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3667-74. PubMed ID: 17433407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Chemical and biological tracers to identify source and transport pathways of septic system contamination to streams in areas with low permeability soils.
Digaletos M; Ptacek CJ; Thomas J; Liu Y
Sci Total Environ; 2023 Apr; 870():161866. PubMed ID: 36709906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Integrated analysis of water quality parameters for cost-effective faecal pollution management in river catchments.
Nnane DE; Ebdon JE; Taylor HD
Water Res; 2011 Mar; 45(6):2235-46. PubMed ID: 21324505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Chemometric approach to validating faecal sterols as source tracer for faecal contamination in water.
Saim N; Osman R; Sari Abg Spian DR; Jaafar MZ; Juahir H; Abdullah MP; Ghani FA
Water Res; 2009 Dec; 43(20):5023-30. PubMed ID: 19896157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Faecal contamination of source-separated human urine based on the content of faecal sterols.
Schönning C; Leeming R; Stenström TA
Water Res; 2002 Apr; 36(8):1965-72. PubMed ID: 12092571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Determination of faecal pollutants in Torrens and Patawalonga catchment waters in South Australia using faecal sterols.
Suprihatin I; Fallowfield H; Bentham R; Cromar N
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(7-8):283-9. PubMed ID: 12793691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Faecal sterols analysis for the identification of human faecal pollution in a non-sewered catchment.
Sullivan D; Brooks P; Tindale N; Chapman S; Ahmed W
Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(5):1355-61. PubMed ID: 20220257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contamination of estuaries from failing septic tank systems: difficulties in scaling up from monitored individual systems to cumulative impact.
Geary P; Lucas S
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Jan; 26(3):2132-2144. PubMed ID: 29397513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating potential applications of faecal sterols in distinguishing sources of faecal contamination from mixed faecal samples.
Shah VG; Dunstan RH; Geary PM; Coombes P; Roberts TK; Von Nagy-Felsobuki E
Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3691-700. PubMed ID: 17614115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative catchment profiling to apportion faecal indicator organism budgets for the Ribble system, the UK's sentinel drainage basin for Water Framework Directive research.
Stapleton CM; Wyer MD; Crowther J; McDonald AT; Kay D; Greaves J; Wither A; Watkins J; Francis C; Humphrey N; Bradford M
J Environ Manage; 2008 Jun; 87(4):535-50. PubMed ID: 18082929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pepper mild mottle virus as an effective tool in microbial source tracking for deficient domestic on-site water treatment systems.
Monleon AJC; Gill LW
Sci Total Environ; 2024 Aug; 939():173229. PubMed ID: 38763202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bacterial source tracking and shellfish contamination in a coastal catchment.
Geary PM; Davies CM
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(7-8):95-100. PubMed ID: 12793667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Defining the sources of low-flow phosphorus transfers in complex catchments.
Arnscheidt J; Jordan P; Li S; McCormick S; McFaul R; McGrogan HJ; Neal M; Sims JT
Sci Total Environ; 2007 Aug; 382(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 17512972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
