These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37952117)

  • 1. Evaluating dynamic and predictive discrimination for recurrent event models: use of a time-dependent C-index.
    Wang J; Jiang X; Ning J
    Biostatistics; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 37952117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new concordance measure for risk prediction models in external validation settings.
    van Klaveren D; Gönen M; Steyerberg EW; Vergouwe Y
    Stat Med; 2016 Oct; 35(23):4136-52. PubMed ID: 27251001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bayesian criterion-based assessments of recurrent event models with applications to commercial truck driver behavior studies.
    Zhang Y; Chen MH; Guo F
    Stat Med; 2022 Oct; 41(23):4607-4628. PubMed ID: 35871759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A C-index for recurrent event data: Application to hospitalizations among dialysis patients.
    Kim S; Schaubel DE; McCullough KP
    Biometrics; 2018 Jun; 74(2):734-743. PubMed ID: 28771674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation and inference of predictive discrimination for survival outcome risk prediction models.
    Li R; Ning J; Feng Z
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2022 Apr; 28(2):219-240. PubMed ID: 35061146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of competing risks prediction models using polytomous discrimination index.
    Ding M; Ning J; Li R
    Can J Stat; 2021 Sep; 49(3):731-753. PubMed ID: 34707327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prognostic models for newly-diagnosed chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kreuzberger N; Damen JA; Trivella M; Estcourt LJ; Aldin A; Umlauff L; Vazquez-Montes MD; Wolff R; Moons KG; Monsef I; Foroutan F; Kreuzer KA; Skoetz N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Jul; 7(7):CD012022. PubMed ID: 32735048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating Dynamic Discrimination Performance of Risk Prediction Models for Survival Outcomes.
    Zhang J; Ning J; Li R
    Stat Biosci; 2023 Jul; 15(2):353-371. PubMed ID: 37691982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting Colorectal Cancer Survival Using Time-to-Event Machine Learning: Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Yang X; Qiu H; Wang L; Wang X
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Oct; 25():e44417. PubMed ID: 37883174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What Is the Effect of Using a Competing-risks Estimator when Predicting Survivorship After Joint Arthroplasty: A Comparison of Approaches to Survivorship Estimation in a Large Registry.
    Cuthbert AR; Graves SE; Giles LC; Glonek G; Pratt N
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Feb; 479(2):392-403. PubMed ID: 33105301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?
    Pan YT; Lin YP; Yen HK; Yen HH; Huang CC; Hsieh HC; Janssen S; Hu MH; Lin WH; Groot OQ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38517402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The calibrated model-based concordance improved assessment of discriminative ability in patient clusters of limited sample size.
    van Klaveren D; Steyerberg EW; Gönen M; Vergouwe Y
    Diagn Progn Res; 2019; 3():11. PubMed ID: 31183411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. C-index regression for recurrent event data.
    Su W; He B; Zhang YD; Yin G
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2022 Jul; 118():106787. PubMed ID: 35568377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Design and analysis of nested case-control studies for recurrent events subject to a terminal event.
    Jazić I; Haneuse S; French B; MacGrogan G; Rondeau V
    Stat Med; 2019 Sep; 38(22):4348-4362. PubMed ID: 31290191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the discriminative ability of risk models for more than two outcome categories.
    Van Calster B; Vergouwe Y; Looman CW; Van Belle V; Timmerman D; Steyerberg EW
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2012 Oct; 27(10):761-70. PubMed ID: 23054032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantifying discrimination of Framingham risk functions with different survival C statistics.
    Pencina MJ; D'Agostino RB; Song L
    Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1543-53. PubMed ID: 22344892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Semi-parametric risk prediction models for recurrent cardiovascular events in the LIPID study.
    Cui J; Forbes A; Kirby A; Marschner I; Simes J; Hunt D; West M; Tonkin A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Apr; 10():27. PubMed ID: 20356409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Generalized scale-change models for recurrent event processes under informative censoring.
    Xu G; Chiou SH; Yan J; Marr K; Huang CY
    Stat Sin; 2020; 30():1773-1795. PubMed ID: 34385810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Semiparametric modeling and estimation of the terminal behavior of recurrent marker processes before failure events.
    Chan KCG; Wang MC
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2017; 112(517):351-362. PubMed ID: 28694552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A time-dependent discrimination index for survival data.
    Antolini L; Boracchi P; Biganzoli E
    Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(24):3927-44. PubMed ID: 16320281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.