These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37953284)

  • 1. Statistical Comparison of Substructures in Pure Aluminum Before and After Creep Deformation, Based on EBSD Image Data.
    Rieder P; Petrich L; Serrano-Munoz I; Fernández R; Bruno G; Schmidt V
    Microsc Microanal; 2023 Dec; 29(6):1889-1900. PubMed ID: 37953284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dislocation substructures in pure aluminium after creep deformation as studied by electron backscatter diffraction.
    Serrano-Munoz I; Fernández R; Saliwan-Neumann R; González-Doncel G; Bruno G
    J Appl Crystallogr; 2022 Aug; 55(Pt 4):860-869. PubMed ID: 35974726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Misorientation distributions in hot deformed NaCl using electron backscattered diffraction.
    Pennock GM; Drury MR; Trimby PW; Spiers CJ
    J Microsc; 2002 Mar; 205(Pt 3):285-94. PubMed ID: 11996193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Study of recovery and first recrystallisation kinetics in CGO Fe3%Si steels using misorientation-derived parameters (EBSD).
    Cruz-Gandarilla F; Bolmaro RE; Mendoza-León HF; Salcedo-Garrido AM; Cabañas-Moreno JG
    J Microsc; 2019 Sep; 275(3):133-148. PubMed ID: 31271444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evolution of local misorientations in the γ/γ'-microstructure of single crystal superalloys during creep studied with the rotation vector baseline (RVB) EBSD method.
    Gamanov S; Dlouhy A; Bürger D; Eggeler G; Thome P
    Microsc Res Tech; 2024 Mar; 87(3):516-533. PubMed ID: 37937744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. EBSD and TEM investigation of the hot deformation substructure characteristics of a type 316L austenitic stainless steel.
    Cizek P; Whiteman JA; Rainforth WM; Beynon JH
    J Microsc; 2004 Mar; 213(3):285-95. PubMed ID: 15009696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the dependence of creep-induced dislocation configurations on crystallographic orientation in pure Al and Al-Mg.
    Fernández R; Bokuchava G; Bruno G; Serrano-Muñoz I; González-Doncel G
    J Appl Crystallogr; 2023 Jun; 56(Pt 3):764-775. PubMed ID: 37284257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating Deformation-Induced Grain Orientation Change in a Polycrystal During In Situ Tensile Deformation using EBSD.
    Buchheit TE; Carroll JD; Clark BG; Boyce BL
    Microsc Microanal; 2015 Aug; 21(4):969-84. PubMed ID: 26189352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Segmentation of 3D EBSD data for subgrain boundary identification and feature characterization.
    Loeb A; Ferry M; Bassman L
    Ultramicroscopy; 2016 Feb; 161():83-89. PubMed ID: 26630071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reconstruction of grains and subgrains from electron backscatter diffraction maps.
    Humphreys FJ
    J Microsc; 2004 Mar; 213(3):247-56. PubMed ID: 15009692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Geometrically necessary dislocation densities in olivine obtained using high-angular resolution electron backscatter diffraction.
    Wallis D; Hansen LN; Ben Britton T; Wilkinson AJ
    Ultramicroscopy; 2016 Sep; 168():34-45. PubMed ID: 27337604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. EBSD study of the orientation dependence of substructure characteristics in a model Fe-30wt%Ni alloy subjected to hot deformation.
    Cizek P; Bai F; Palmiere EJ; Rainforth WM
    J Microsc; 2005 Feb; 217(Pt 2):138-51. PubMed ID: 15683411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. EBSD FEG-SEM, TEM and XRD techniques applied to grain study of a commercially pure 1200 aluminum subjected to equal-channel angular-pressing.
    Cabibbo M; Evangelista E; Scalabroni C
    Micron; 2005; 36(5):401-14. PubMed ID: 15908224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving EBSD precision by orientation refinement with full pattern matching.
    Winkelmann A; Jablon BM; Tong VS; Trager-Cowan C; Mingard KP
    J Microsc; 2020 Feb; 277(2):79-92. PubMed ID: 31997348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intracrystalline deformation microstructures in natural olivine with implications for stress estimation.
    Ma J; Liu W; Cao Y; Zhang J; Liu C
    Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):20069. PubMed ID: 36414655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Orientation precision of electron backscatter diffraction measurements near grain boundaries.
    Wright SI; Nowell MM; de Kloe R; Chan L
    Microsc Microanal; 2014 Jun; 20(3):852-63. PubMed ID: 24576405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Overcoming the drawbacks of plastic strain estimation based on KAM.
    Shen RR; Efsing P
    Ultramicroscopy; 2018 Jan; 184(Pt A):156-163. PubMed ID: 28910682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Problems in determining the misorientation axes, for small angular misorientations, using electron backscatter diffraction in the SEM.
    Prior DJ
    J Microsc; 1999 Sep; 195(3):217-225. PubMed ID: 10460687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adaptive domain misorientation approach for the EBSD measurement of deformation induced dislocation sub-structures.
    Lehto P
    Ultramicroscopy; 2021 Mar; 222():113203. PubMed ID: 33545656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. EBSD and electron channeling study of anomalous slip in oligocrystals of high chromium ferritic stainless steel.
    Hsiao ZW; Wu TY; Chen D; Kuo JC; Lin DY
    Micron; 2017 Mar; 94():15-25. PubMed ID: 28011347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.