These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37953649)

  • 1. Endoscopist-related factors affecting adenoma detection during colonoscopy: Data from the J-SCOUT study.
    Kawamura T; Sekiguchi M; Takamaru H; Mizuguchi Y; Horiguchi G; Toyoizumi H; Kato M; Kobayashi K; Sada M; Oda Y; Yokoyama A; Utsumi T; Tsuji Y; Ohki D; Takeuchi Y; Shichijo S; Ikematsu H; Matsuda K; Teramukai S; Kobayashi N; Matsuda T; Saito Y; Tanaka K
    Dig Endosc; 2024 Jan; 36(1):51-58. PubMed ID: 37953649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality of colonoscopy withdrawal technique and variability in adenoma detection rates (with videos).
    Lee RH; Tang RS; Muthusamy VR; Ho SB; Shah NK; Wetzel L; Bain AS; Mackintosh EE; Paek AM; Crissien AM; Saraf LJ; Kalmaz DM; Savides TJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Jul; 74(1):128-34. PubMed ID: 21531410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Increased Rate of Adenoma Detection Associates With Reduced Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Death.
    Kaminski MF; Wieszczy P; Rupinski M; Wojciechowska U; Didkowska J; Kraszewska E; Kobiela J; Franczyk R; Rupinska M; Kocot B; Chaber-Ciopinska A; Pachlewski J; Polkowski M; Regula J
    Gastroenterology; 2017 Jul; 153(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 28428142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Morning colonoscopies are associated with improved adenoma detection rates.
    Teng TY; Khor SN; Kailasam M; Cheah WK; Lau CC
    Surg Endosc; 2016 May; 30(5):1796-803. PubMed ID: 26198158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The analysis of multilevel factors affecting adenoma detection rates for colonoscopies: a large-scale retrospective study.
    Huang L; Hu Y; Liu S; Jin B; Lu B
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2021 Oct; 21(1):403. PubMed ID: 34696715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Serrated polyp detection and risk of interval post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer: a population-based study.
    van Toledo DEFWM; IJspeert JEG; Bossuyt PMM; Bleijenberg AGC; van Leerdam ME; van der Vlugt M; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Spaander MCW; Dekker E
    Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Aug; 7(8):747-754. PubMed ID: 35550250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. "Endoscopic" adenoma detection rate as a quality indicator of colonoscopy: First report from the J-SCOUT study.
    Kawamura T; Sekiguchi M; Takamaru H; Mizuguchi Y; Horiguchi G; Kato M; Kobayashi K; Sada M; Oda Y; Yokoyama A; Utsumi T; Tsuji Y; Ohki D; Takeuchi Y; Shichijo S; Ikematsu H; Matsuda K; Teramukai S; Kobayashi N; Matsuda T; Saito Y; Tanaka K
    Dig Endosc; 2023 Jul; 35(5):615-624. PubMed ID: 36434769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Difference in Physician- and Patient-Dependent Factors Contributing to Adenoma Detection Rate and Serrated Polyp Detection Rate.
    Cavicchi M; Tharsis G; Burtin P; Cattan P; Venezia F; Tordjman G; Gillet A; Samama J; Nahon-Uzan K; Karsenti D
    Dig Dis Sci; 2019 Dec; 64(12):3579-3588. PubMed ID: 31471862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Endoscopist characteristics that influence the quality of colonoscopy.
    Jover R; Zapater P; Bujanda L; Hernández V; Cubiella J; Pellisé M; Ponce M; Ono A; Lanas A; Seoane A; Marín-Gabriel JC; Chaparro M; Cacho G; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Fernández-Díez S; Peris A; Nicolás-Pérez D; Murcia O; Castells A; Quintero E;
    Endoscopy; 2016 Mar; 48(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 26845473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adenoma Detection Rate and Risk for Interval Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer in Fecal Immunochemical Test-Based Screening : A Population-Based Cohort Study.
    Wisse PHA; Erler NS; de Boer SY; den Hartog B; Oudkerk Pool M; Terhaar Sive Droste JS; Verveer C; Meijer GA; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Kuipers EJ; Dekker E; Spaander MCW
    Ann Intern Med; 2022 Oct; 175(10):1366-1373. PubMed ID: 36162114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monitoring colonoscopy withdrawal time significantly improves the adenoma detection rate and the performance of endoscopists.
    Vavricka SR; Sulz MC; Degen L; Rechner R; Manz M; Biedermann L; Beglinger C; Peter S; Safroneeva E; Rogler G; Schoepfer AM
    Endoscopy; 2016 Mar; 48(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 26808396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Association of Adenoma and Proximal Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates With Endoscopist Characteristics.
    Sarvepalli S; Garber A; Rothberg MB; Mankaney G; McMichael J; Morris-Stiff G; Vargo JJ; Rizk MK; Burke CA
    JAMA Surg; 2019 Jul; 154(7):627-635. PubMed ID: 30994911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of fair bowel preparation quality on adenoma and serrated polyp detection: data from the New Hampshire colonoscopy registry by using a standardized preparation-quality rating.
    Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Robinson CM; Goodrich M; Weiss JE
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Sep; 80(3):463-70. PubMed ID: 24818550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Endoscopist Fatigue May Contribute to a Decline in the Effectiveness of Screening Colonoscopy.
    Lee CK; Cha JM; Kim WJ
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2015 Jul; 49(6):e51-6. PubMed ID: 25110871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR) Irrespective of Indication Is Comparable to Screening ADR: Implications for Quality Monitoring.
    Kaltenbach T; Gawron A; Meyer CS; Gupta S; Shergill A; Dominitz JA; Soetikno RM; Nguyen-Vu T; A Whooley M; Kahi CJ
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Sep; 19(9):1883-1889.e1. PubMed ID: 33618027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Variable Endoscopist performance in proximal and distal adenoma detection during colonoscopy: a retrospective cohort study.
    James P; Hegagi M; Hegagi M; Antonova L; Rostom A; Dube C; Murthy S; Goel R; Chatterjee A
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 May; 18(1):73. PubMed ID: 29848305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality of colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme with immunochemical faecal occult blood test: the EQuIPE study (Evaluating Quality Indicators of the Performance of Endoscopy).
    Zorzi M; Senore C; Da Re F; Barca A; Bonelli LA; Cannizzaro R; Fasoli R; Di Furia L; Di Giulio E; Mantellini P; Naldoni C; Sassatelli R; Rex D; Hassan C; Zappa M;
    Gut; 2015 Sep; 64(9):1389-96. PubMed ID: 25227521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Defining adenoma detection rate benchmarks in average-risk male veterans.
    El-Halabi MM; Rex DK; Saito A; Eckert GJ; Kahi CJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Jan; 89(1):137-143. PubMed ID: 30144416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High quality of screening colonoscopy in Austria is not dependent on endoscopist specialty or setting.
    Kozbial K; Reinhart K; Heinze G; Zwatz C; Bannert C; Salzl P; Waldmann E; Britto-Arias M; Ferlitsch A; Trauner M; Weiss W; Ferlitsch M
    Endoscopy; 2015 Mar; 47(3):207-16. PubMed ID: 25412094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physician report cards and implementing standards of practice are both significantly associated with improved screening colonoscopy quality.
    Keswani RN; Yadlapati R; Gleason KM; Ciolino JD; Manka M; O'Leary KJ; Barnard C; Pandolfino JE
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2015 Aug; 110(8):1134-9. PubMed ID: 25869388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.