These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37953649)

  • 21. Interval cancer after colonoscopy in the Austrian National Screening Programme: influence of physician and patient factors.
    Waldmann E; Penz D; Šinkovec H; Heinze G; Rinner C; Jiricka L; Majcher B; Hinterberger A; Trauner M; Ferlitsch M
    Gut; 2021 Jul; 70(7):1309-1317. PubMed ID: 33023903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Association of Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenoma Characteristics With Colorectal Cancer Mortality After Screening Colonoscopy.
    Waldmann E; Kammerlander AA; Gessl I; Penz D; Majcher B; Hinterberger A; Bretthauer M; Trauner MH; Ferlitsch M
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Sep; 19(9):1890-1898. PubMed ID: 33878471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Anatomic and advanced adenoma detection rates as quality metrics determined via natural language processing.
    Gawron AJ; Thompson WK; Keswani RN; Rasmussen LV; Kho AN
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Dec; 109(12):1844-9. PubMed ID: 24935271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The 'ins and outs' of colonoscopy at Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre, South Africa: A practice audit of the outpatient endoscopy unit.
    Bouter C; Barrow P; Bizos D; Bobat B; Devar J; Harran N; Joseph C; Mahomed A; Oettle J; Ramos J; Seabi M; Kgabage G; Gaylard P; Surridge D; Etheredge H; Fabian J; Lutrin D; Karlsson K
    S Afr Med J; 2020 Nov; 110(12):1186-1190. PubMed ID: 33403963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comprehensive evaluation of the learning curve to achieve satisfactory adenoma detection rate.
    Dong Z; Sun H; Li B; Zhang Q; Sun K; Wang Z; Qian X; Wang J; Zhan T; Jiang Y; Chen Y; Xu S
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Jun; 36(6):1649-1655. PubMed ID: 33105040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Individual feedback and monitoring of endoscopist performance improves the adenoma detection rate in screening colonoscopy: a prospective case-control study.
    Ishibashi F; Fukushima K; Kobayashi K; Kawakami T; Tanaka R; Kato J; Sato A; Konda K; Sugihara K; Baba S
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Jun; 35(6):2566-2575. PubMed ID: 32468263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prolonged cecal insertion time is associated with decreased adenoma detection.
    von Renteln D; Robertson DJ; Bensen S; Pohl H
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Mar; 85(3):574-580. PubMed ID: 27590962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Modifiable endoscopic factors that influence the adenoma detection rate in colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies.
    Jover R; Zapater P; Polanía E; Bujanda L; Lanas A; Hermo JA; Cubiella J; Ono A; González-Méndez Y; Peris A; Pellisé M; Seoane A; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Ponce M; Marín-Gabriel JC; Chaparro M; Cacho G; Fernández-Díez S; Arenas J; Sopeña F; de-Castro L; Vega-Villaamil P; Rodríguez-Soler M; Carballo F; Salas D; Morillas JD; Andreu M; Quintero E; Castells A;
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Mar; 77(3):381-389.e1. PubMed ID: 23218945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Usefulness of mean number of adenomas per positive screenee for identifying meticulous endoscopists among those who achieve acceptable adenoma detection rates.
    Aniwan S; Vanduangden K; Kerr SJ; Wisedopas N; Kongtab N; Kullavanijaya P; Rerknimitr R
    Endoscopy; 2021 Apr; 53(4):394-401. PubMed ID: 32544957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The conversion factor for predicting adenoma detection rate from polyp detection rate varies according to colonoscopy indication and patient sex.
    Vojtechova G; Ngo O; Grega T; Kmochova K; Voska M; Buckova B; Majek O; Zavoral M; Suchanek S
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2020 Jul; 29(4):294-302. PubMed ID: 32543806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Secondary Quality Indicator to Improve Prediction of Adenoma Miss Rate Apart from Adenoma Detection Rate.
    Aniwan S; Orkoonsawat P; Viriyautsahakul V; Angsuwatcharakon P; Pittayanon R; Wisedopas N; Sumdin S; Ponuthai Y; Wiangngoen S; Kullavanijaya P; Rerknimitr R
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2016 May; 111(5):723-9. PubMed ID: 26809333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Differences in detection rates of adenomas and serrated polyps in screening versus surveillance colonoscopies, based on the new hampshire colonoscopy registry.
    Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Goodrich M; Robinson CM; Weiss JE
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Oct; 11(10):1308-12. PubMed ID: 23660415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Associations between endoscopist feedback and improvements in colonoscopy quality indicators: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Bishay K; Causada-Calo N; Scaffidi MA; Walsh CM; Anderson JT; Rostom A; Dube C; Keswani RN; Heitman SJ; Hilsden RJ; Shorr R; Grover SC; Forbes N
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Nov; 92(5):1030-1040.e9. PubMed ID: 32330506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Factors determining the quality of screening colonoscopy: a prospective study on adenoma detection rates, from 12,134 examinations (Berlin colonoscopy project 3, BECOP-3).
    Adler A; Wegscheider K; Lieberman D; Aminalai A; Aschenbeck J; Drossel R; Mayr M; Mroß M; Scheel M; Schröder A; Gerber K; Stange G; Roll S; Gauger U; Wiedenmann B; Altenhofen L; Rosch T
    Gut; 2013 Feb; 62(2):236-41. PubMed ID: 22442161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Defining Benchmarks for Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenomas Per Colonoscopy in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy Due to a Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test.
    Hilsden RJ; Bridges R; Dube C; McGregor SE; Naugler C; Rose SM; Rostom A; Heitman SJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2016 Dec; 111(12):1743-1749. PubMed ID: 27725649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Public reporting of colonoscopy quality is associated with an increase in endoscopist adenoma detection rate.
    Abdul-Baki H; Schoen RE; Dean K; Rose S; Leffler DA; Kuganeswaran E; Morris M; Carrell D; Mehrotra A
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Oct; 82(4):676-82. PubMed ID: 26385276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Impact of adenoma detection rate on detection of advanced adenomas and endoscopic adverse events in a study of over 200,000 screening colonoscopies.
    Penz D; Ferlitsch A; Waldmann E; Irina G; Daniel P; Asaturi A; Hinterberger A; Majcher B; Szymanska A; Trauner M; Ferlitsch M
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Jan; 91(1):135-141. PubMed ID: 31499041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Screening colonoscopy: High quality regardless of endoscopist specialty.
    Sapci I; Aiello A; Gorgun E; Rizk M; Delaney CP; Steele SR; Valente MA
    Am J Surg; 2019 Mar; 217(3):442-444. PubMed ID: 30268418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Difference in adenoma detection rates according to colonoscopic withdrawal times and the level of expertise.
    Kim YD; Bae WK; Choi YH; Jwa YJ; Jung SK; Lee BH; Paik WH; Kim JW; Kim NH; Kim KA; Lee JS
    Korean J Gastroenterol; 2014 Nov; 64(5):278-83. PubMed ID: 25420737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Does time of day matter for colonoscopy quality? A review of over 13,000 screening colonoscopies in a colorectal surgery unit.
    Sapci I; Jia X; Wu J; Gorgun E; Liska D; Church J; Steele SR; Valente MA
    Am J Surg; 2022 Mar; 223(3):500-502. PubMed ID: 34916039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.