BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37955169)

  • 1. A comparison of maxillary posterior changes following facemask therapy: Skeletal anchorage versus tooth-borne anchorage.
    Lee HJ; Jeong H; Park JH; Choi DS; Jang I; Cha BK
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2024 Apr; 27(2):303-312. PubMed ID: 37955169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of facemask therapy effects using skeletal and tooth-borne anchorage.
    Lee HJ; Choi DS; Jang I; Cha BK
    Angle Orthod; 2022 May; 92(3):307-314. PubMed ID: 34964848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary changes associated with facemask and rapid maxillary expansion compared with bone anchored maxillary protraction.
    Hino CT; Cevidanes LH; Nguyen TT; De Clerck HJ; Franchi L; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):705-14. PubMed ID: 24182587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A retrospective comparison of two protocols for correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion in prepubertal children: hybrid hyrax expander with mandibular miniplates and rapid maxillary expansion with face mask.
    Tarraf NE; Dalci O; Dalci K; Altug AT; Darendeliler MA
    Prog Orthod; 2023 Jan; 24(1):3. PubMed ID: 36683080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The short-term treatment effects of face mask therapy in Class III patients based on the anchorage device: miniplates vs rapid maxillary expansion.
    Lee NK; Yang IH; Baek SH
    Angle Orthod; 2012 Sep; 82(5):846-52. PubMed ID: 22264134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the short-term effects of facemask therapy preceded by conventional rapid maxillary expansion or by an alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions protocol : A retrospective study.
    Akbulut S; Yilmaz S; Yagci A
    J Orofac Orthop; 2023 Sep; 84(5):278-286. PubMed ID: 35257194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of hybrid rapid maxillary expansion and facemask treatment in growing skeletal Class III patients: a retrospective follow-up study.
    Maino GB; Cremonini F; Maino G; Paoletto E; De Maio M; Spedicato GA; Palone M; Lombardo L
    Prog Orthod; 2022 Sep; 23(1):44. PubMed ID: 36178519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Midfacial Protraction With Skeletal Anchorage After Pterygomaxillary Separation.
    de Menezes LM; de Oliveira RB; Weissheimer A; Avelar RL
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 27(6):1561-4. PubMed ID: 27428915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term results of surgically assisted maxillary protraction vs regular facemask.
    Nevzatoğlu S; Küçükkeleş N
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Nov; 84(6):1002-9. PubMed ID: 24654941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Facemask therapy with skeletal anchorage: A possible alternative to orthognathic surgery.
    Cha BK; Park JH; Choi DS; Jang I
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 Mar; 24 Suppl 1():13-20. PubMed ID: 33119188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cephalometric effects of Pushing Splints 3 compared with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy in Class III malocclusion children: a randomized controlled trial.
    Galeotti A; Martina S; Viarani V; Franchi L; Rongo R; D'Antò V; Festa P
    Eur J Orthod; 2021 Jun; 43(3):274-282. PubMed ID: 33313718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Short-term effects of a modified Alt-RAMEC protocol for early treatment of Class III malocclusion: a controlled study.
    Masucci C; Franchi L; Giuntini V; Defraia E
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2014 Nov; 17(4):259-69. PubMed ID: 25041370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional evaluation of the maxillary effects of two orthopaedic protocols for the treatment of Class III malocclusion: A prospective study.
    Fischer B; Masucci C; Ruellas A; Cevidanes L; Giuntini V; Nieri M; Nardi C; Franchi L; McNamara JA; Defraia E
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2018 Nov; 21(4):248-257. PubMed ID: 30253035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maxillary protraction with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask versus skeletal anchorage with mini-implants in class III patients: a non-randomized clinical trial.
    de Souza RA; Rino Neto J; de Paiva JB
    Prog Orthod; 2019 Sep; 20(1):35. PubMed ID: 31475309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relative effectiveness of facemask therapy with alternate maxillary expansion and constriction in the early treatment of Class III malocclusion.
    Liu Y; Hou R; Jin H; Zhang X; Wu Z; Li Z; Guo J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Mar; 159(3):321-332. PubMed ID: 33487499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment.
    Ngan P; Wilmes B; Drescher D; Martin C; Weaver B; Gunel E
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():26. PubMed ID: 26303311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A retrospective long-term comparison of early RME-facemask versus late Hybrid-Hyrax, alt-RAMEC and miniscrew-supported intraoral elastics in growing Class III patients.
    Papadopoulou AK; Koletsi D; Masucci C; Giuntini V; Franchi L; Darendeliler MA
    Int Orthod; 2022 Mar; 20(1):100603. PubMed ID: 34972642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of cleft type, facemask anchorage method, and alveolar bone graft on maxillary protraction: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Yang IH; Chang YI; Kim TW; Ahn SJ; Lim WH; Lee NK; Baek SH
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2012 Mar; 49(2):221-9. PubMed ID: 21740169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative assessment of orthodontic treatment outcomes of mild skeletal Class III malocclusion between facemask and facemask in combination with a miniscrew for anchorage in growing patients:
    Seiryu M; Ida H; Mayama A; Sasaki S; Sasaki S; Deguchi T; Takano-Yamamoto T
    Angle Orthod; 2020 Jan; 90(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 31398066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative assessment of facemask therapy with and without skeletal anchorage in growing Class III patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP): A single-center, prospective randomized clinical trial.
    Dutta S; Batra P; Raghavan S; Sharma K; Talwar A; Arora A; Srivastava A
    Spec Care Dentist; 2024; 44(2):491-501. PubMed ID: 37084175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.