These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37955717)

  • 21. Surgical outcomes of total laparoscopic hysterectomy with 2-dimensional versus 3-dimensional laparoscopic surgical systems.
    Yazawa H; Takiguchi K; Imaizumi K; Wada M; Ito F
    Fukushima J Med Sci; 2018 Apr; 64(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 29540624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Perioperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Based on Route of Concurrent Hysterectomy: A Secondary Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
    Cardenas-Trowers O; Stewart JR; Meriwether KV; Francis SL; Gupta A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(4):953-958. PubMed ID: 31404710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Validation of a Laparoscopic Ferromagnetic Technology-based Vessel Sealing Device and Comparative Study to Ultrasonic and Bipolar Laparoscopic Devices.
    Chen J; Jensen CR; Manwaring PK; Glasgow RE
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2017 Apr; 27(2):e12-e17. PubMed ID: 28234706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Efficacy and safety of V-Loc
    Hafermann J; Silas U; Saunders R
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 Apr; 309(4):1249-1265. PubMed ID: 38127141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Perioperative outcomes using LigaSure compared with conventional bipolar instruments in laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial.
    Janssen PF; Brölmann HA; van Kesteren PJ; Bongers MY; Thurkow AL; Heymans MW; Huirne JA
    BJOG; 2011 Dec; 118(13):1568-75. PubMed ID: 21895949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Single-Use Energy Sources and Operating Room Time for Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Holloran-Schwartz MB; Gavard JA; Martin JC; Blaskiewicz RJ; Yeung PP
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 26318400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Laparoscopic
    Li H; Zheng J; Cai JY; Li SH; Zhang JB; Wang XM; Chen GH; Yang Y; Wang GS
    World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Nov; 23(43):7791-7806. PubMed ID: 29209120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy using modern bipolar electrosurgical instruments based on the ForceTriad energy platform.
    Shen-Gunther J; Shank JJ
    Mil Med; 2010 Aug; 175(8):610-5. PubMed ID: 20731267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of surgical outcomes using Gyrus PKS™ vs LigaSure™ in total laparoscopic hysterectomy: A randomised controlled trial.
    Wong C; Goh A; Merkur H
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Oct; 60(5):790-796. PubMed ID: 32729141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clinical utility of a novel ultrasonic vessel sealing device in transecting and sealing large vessels during laparoscopic hysterectomy using advanced hemostasis mode.
    Nieboer TE; Steller CJ; Hinoul P; Maxson AJ; Schwiers ML; Miller CE; Coppus SF; Kent AS
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Jun; 201():135-9. PubMed ID: 27124666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Total abdominal hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease: a meta-analysis.
    Walsh CA; Walsh SR; Tang TY; Slack M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 May; 144(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 19324491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Safety and efficacy of using advanced electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing during vaginal hysterectomy in morbidly obese patients: a retrospective cohort analysis.
    Karacan T; Ozyurek E; Wetherilt LS; Kiyak H; Yilmaz S; Kaya E
    Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(10):523-529. PubMed ID: 29192412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Uterine manipulator in total laparoscopic hysterectomy: safety and usefulness.
    Abdel Khalek Y; Bitar R; Christoforou C; Garzon S; Tropea A; Biondi A; Sleiman Z
    Updates Surg; 2020 Dec; 72(4):1247-1254. PubMed ID: 31606857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Laparoscopic hysterectomy: the Kaiser Permanente San Diego experience.
    Hoffman CP; Kennedy J; Borschel L; Burchette R; Kidd A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 15904592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparative Analysis of Peri-Operative Outcomes Following Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with Conventional Bipolar-Electrosurgery versus High-Pressure Pulsed LigaSure Use.
    Batra S; Bhardwaj P; Dagar M
    Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther; 2022; 11(2):105-109. PubMed ID: 35746909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Randomized study comparing use of THUNDERBEAT technology vs standard electrosurgery during laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for gynecologic cancer.
    Fagotti A; Vizzielli G; Fanfani F; Gallotta V; Rossitto C; Costantini B; Gueli-Alletti S; Avenia N; Iodice R; Scambia G
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(3):447-53. PubMed ID: 24325899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Laparoscopic vs. open left lateral sectionectomy: An update meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials.
    Macacari RL; Coelho FF; Bernardo WM; Kruger JAP; Jeismann VB; Fonseca GM; Cesconetto DM; Cecconello I; Herman P
    Int J Surg; 2019 Jan; 61():1-10. PubMed ID: 30496866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Single-Port vs Multiport Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Xie W; Cao D; Yang J; Yu M; Shen K; Zhao L
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(7):1049-1056. PubMed ID: 27590569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Efficacy of robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer compared with that of open and laparoscopic surgery: A separate meta-analysis of high-quality studies.
    Zhang SS; Ding T; Cui ZH; Lv Y; Jiang RA
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jan; 98(4):e14171. PubMed ID: 30681582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of 30-day Complication Rates between Laparoscopic Myomectomy and Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Uterine Leiomyoma in Women Older Than Age 40.
    Sheyn D; Bretschnieder CE; Mahajan ST; El-Nashar S; Billow M; Ninivaggio CS
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(6):1076-1082. PubMed ID: 30385429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.