These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37956061)

  • 21. Distinct fronto-temporal substrates of distributional and taxonomic similarity among words: evidence from RSA of BOLD signals.
    Carota F; Nili H; Pulvermüller F; Kriegeskorte N
    Neuroimage; 2021 Jan; 224():117408. PubMed ID: 33049407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Primacy of Experience in Language Processing: Semantic Priming Is Driven Primarily by Experiential Similarity.
    Fernandino L; Conant LL
    bioRxiv; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 36993310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. tESA: a distributional measure for calculating semantic relatedness.
    Rybinski M; Aldana-Montes JF
    J Biomed Semantics; 2016 Dec; 7(1):67. PubMed ID: 28031037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Do as I say, not as I do: a lexical distributional account of English locative verb class acquisition.
    Twomey KE; Chang F; Ambridge B
    Cogn Psychol; 2014 Sep; 73():41-71. PubMed ID: 24956024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluating semantic relations in neural word embeddings with biomedical and general domain knowledge bases.
    Chen Z; He Z; Liu X; Bian J
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2018 Jul; 18(Suppl 2):65. PubMed ID: 30066651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Lexical distributional cues, but not situational cues, are readily used to learn abstract locative verb-structure associations.
    Twomey KE; Chang F; Ambridge B
    Cognition; 2016 Aug; 153():124-39. PubMed ID: 27183399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of word embeddings for the biomedical natural language processing.
    Wang Y; Liu S; Afzal N; Rastegar-Mojarad M; Wang L; Shen F; Kingsbury P; Liu H
    J Biomed Inform; 2018 Nov; 87():12-20. PubMed ID: 30217670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Role of Negative Information in Distributional Semantic Learning.
    Johns BT; Mewhort DJK; Jones MN
    Cogn Sci; 2019 May; 43(5):e12730. PubMed ID: 31087587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Lexical factors and cerebral regions influencing verbal fluency performance in MCI.
    Clark DG; Wadley VG; Kapur P; DeRamus TP; Singletary B; Nicholas AP; Blanton PD; Lokken K; Deshpande H; Marson D; Deutsch G
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Feb; 54():98-111. PubMed ID: 24384308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The count-mass distinction in typically developing and grammatically specifically language impaired children: new evidence on the role of syntax and semantics.
    Froud K; van der Lely HK
    J Commun Disord; 2008; 41(3):274-303. PubMed ID: 18206904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Estimating the average need of semantic knowledge from distributional semantic models.
    Hollis G
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Nov; 45(8):1350-1370. PubMed ID: 28707176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Language experience predicts semantic priming of lexical decision.
    Aujla H
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2021 Sep; 75(3):235-244. PubMed ID: 33956462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bridging the theoretical gap between semantic representation models without the pressure of a ranking: some lessons learnt from LSA.
    Jorge-Botana G; Olmos R; Luzón JM
    Cogn Process; 2020 Feb; 21(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 31555943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Lexical and message-level sentence context effects on fixation times in reading.
    Morris RK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1994 Jan; 20(1):92-103. PubMed ID: 8138791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Psycholinguistic measures for German verb pairs: Semantic transparency, semantic relatedness, verb family size, and age of reading acquisition.
    Smolka E; Eulitz C
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Aug; 50(4):1540-1562. PubMed ID: 29916042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparing word frequency, semantic diversity, and semantic distinctiveness in lexical organization.
    Chang M; Jones MN; Johns BT
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Jun; 152(6):1814-1823. PubMed ID: 37307352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A Critical Review of Network-Based and Distributional Approaches to Semantic Memory Structure and Processes.
    Kumar AA; Steyvers M; Balota DA
    Top Cogn Sci; 2022 Jan; 14(1):54-77. PubMed ID: 34092042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Affixation in semantic space: Modeling morpheme meanings with compositional distributional semantics.
    Marelli M; Baroni M
    Psychol Rev; 2015 Jul; 122(3):485-515. PubMed ID: 26120909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Visual and Affective Multimodal Models of Word Meaning in Language and Mind.
    De Deyne S; Navarro DJ; Collell G; Perfors A
    Cogn Sci; 2021 Jan; 45(1):e12922. PubMed ID: 33432630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Learning semantic categories of L2 verbs: The case of cutting and breaking verbs.
    Saji N; Hong C; Wang C
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(1):e0296628. PubMed ID: 38241255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.