104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37956073)
1. Independent factor structure replication of the SAEBRS teacher and student scales.
Gross TJ; Keesey S
Sch Psychol; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 37956073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evidence for the interpretation of Social, Academic, and Emotional Behavior Risk Screener (SAEBRS) scores: An argument-based approach to screener validation.
Kilgus SP; Bonifay WE; von der Embse NP; Allen AN; Eklund K
J Sch Psychol; 2018 Jun; 68():129-141. PubMed ID: 29861023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating the applied use of a mental health screener: Structural validity of the Social, Academic, and Emotional Behavior Risk Screener.
von der Embse NP; Pendergast LL; Kilgus SP; Eklund KR
Psychol Assess; 2016 Oct; 28(10):1265-1275. PubMed ID: 26619092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Psychometric defensibility of the Social, Academic, and Emotional Behavior Risk Screener (SAEBRS) Teacher Rating Scale and multiple gating procedure within elementary and middle school samples.
Kilgus SP; Eklund K; von der Embse NP; Taylor CN; Sims WA
J Sch Psychol; 2016 Oct; 58():21-39. PubMed ID: 27586068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of teacher burnout and self-efficacy on teacher-related variance in social-emotional and behavioral screening scores.
McLean D; Eklund K; Kilgus SP; Burns MK
Sch Psychol; 2019 Sep; 34(5):503-511. PubMed ID: 30589314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Universal screening for social-emotional and behavioral risk: Differential item functioning on the SAEBRS.
Izumi JT; Eklund K
Sch Psychol; 2023 Jul; 38(4):238-246. PubMed ID: 37053427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic accuracy of a universal screening multiple gating procedure: A replication study.
Kilgus SP; von der Embse NP; Taylor CN; Van Wie MP; Sims WA
Sch Psychol Q; 2018 Dec; 33(4):582-589. PubMed ID: 29792498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing the fitting propensity of factor models.
Bader M; Moshagen M
Psychol Methods; 2022 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 36201821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Psychometric properties of the Opening Minds Stigma Scale for Health Care Providers in 32 European countries - A bifactor ESEM representation.
Őri D; Szocsics P; Molnár T; Bankovska Motlova L; Kazakova O; Mörkl S; Wallies M; Abdulhakim M; Boivin S; Bruna K; Cabacos C; Carbone EA; Dashi E; Grech G; Greguras S; Ivanovic I; Guevara K; Kakar S; Kotsis K; Klinkby IMI; Maslak J; Matheiken S; Mirkovic A; Nechepurenko N; Panayi A; Pereira AT; Pomarol-Clotet E; Raaj S; Rus Prelog P; Soler-Vidal J; Strumila R; Schuster F; Kisand H; Hargi A; Ahmadova G; Vircik M; Yilmaz Kafali H; Grinko N; Győrffy Z; Rózsa S
Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1168929. PubMed ID: 37361150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability and omega hierarchical in multidimensional data: A comparison of various estimators.
Cho E
Psychol Methods; 2022 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 36048053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multi-informant universal screening: Evaluation of rater, item, and construct variance using a trifactor model.
von der Embse N; Kim ES; Kilgus S; Dedrick R; Sanchez A
J Sch Psychol; 2019 Dec; 77():52-66. PubMed ID: 31837728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cross-sectional study of Australian medical student attitudes towards older people confirms a four-factor structure and psychometric properties of the Australian Ageing Semantic Differential.
Wilson M; Tran Y; Wilson I; Kurrle SE
BMJ Open; 2020 Aug; 10(8):e036108. PubMed ID: 32801196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.
Meng R; Li J; Wang Z; Zhang D; Liu B; Luo Y; Hu Y; Yu C
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2020 Mar; 18(1):70. PubMed ID: 32169070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling: A meta-analytic review of model fit.
Gegenfurtner A
Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1037111. PubMed ID: 36389589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. No probifactor model fit index bias, but a propensity toward selecting the best model.
Bader M; Moshagen M
J Psychopathol Clin Sci; 2022 Aug; 131(6):689-695. PubMed ID: 35901396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of universal screening scores to predict distal academic and behavioral outcomes: A multilevel approach.
Eklund K; Kilgus S; von der Embse N; Beardmore M; Tanner N
Psychol Assess; 2017 May; 29(5):486-499. PubMed ID: 27504906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing Essential Unidimensionality of Scales and Structural Coefficient Bias.
Liu X; Cao P; Lai X; Wen J; Yang Y
Educ Psychol Meas; 2023 Feb; 83(1):28-47. PubMed ID: 36601253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factor structure of the 10-item CES-D Scale among patients with persistent COVID-19.
Ramírez-Vélez R; Olabarrieta-Landa L; Rivera D; Izquierdo M
J Med Virol; 2023 Jan; 95(1):e28236. PubMed ID: 36258275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing knowledge and attitudes about mental illness in Ningxia, China.
Chen H; Wang Z; Phillips MR
Transcult Psychiatry; 2018 Feb; 55(1):94-119. PubMed ID: 29264995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of the Italian Yale Food Addiction Scale in postgraduate university students.
Manzoni GM; Rossi A; Pietrabissa G; Varallo G; Molinari E; Poggiogalle E; Donini LM; Tarrini G; Melchionda N; Piccione C; Gravina G; Luxardi G; Manzato E; Schumann R; Innamorati M; Imperatori C; Fabbricatore M; Castelnuovo G
Eat Weight Disord; 2018 Apr; 23(2):167-176. PubMed ID: 29532419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
