129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37956610)
21. Lung-RADS Version 1.0 versus Lung-RADS Version 1.1: Comparison of Categories Using Nodules from the National Lung Screening Trial.
Kastner J; Hossain R; Jeudy J; Dako F; Mehta V; Dalal S; Dharaiya E; White C
Radiology; 2021 Jul; 300(1):199-206. PubMed ID: 33944631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Lung-Reporting and Data System 2.0: Impact of the Updated Approach to Juxtapleural Nodules During Lung Cancer Screening Using the National Lung Cancer Screening Trial Data Set.
Chelala L; Hossain R; Jeudy J; Nader Z; Kastner J; White C
J Thorac Imaging; 2024 Jul; 39(4):241-246. PubMed ID: 37889546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prospective validation of an ultrasound-based thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TI-RADS) on 3980 thyroid nodules.
Zhang J; Liu BJ; Xu HX; Xu JM; Zhang YF; Liu C; Wu J; Sun LP; Guo LH; Liu LN; Xu XH; Qu S
Int J Clin Exp Med; 2015; 8(4):5911-7. PubMed ID: 26131184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Racial Disparities in Adherence to Annual Lung Cancer Screening and Recommended Follow-Up Care: A Multicenter Cohort Study.
Kim RY; Rendle KA; Mitra N; Saia CA; Neslund-Dudas C; Greenlee RT; Burnett-Hartman AN; Honda SA; Simoff MJ; Schapira MM; Croswell JM; Meza R; Ritzwoller DP; Vachani A
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2022 Sep; 19(9):1561-1569. PubMed ID: 35167781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Factors Influencing the False Positive Rate in CT Lung Cancer Screening.
Hammer MM; Byrne SC; Kong CY
Acad Radiol; 2022 Feb; 29 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S18-S22. PubMed ID: 32893112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effectiveness of radiologist training in improving reader agreement for Lung-RADS 4X categorization.
Kim H; Goo JM; Kim TJ; Kim HY; Gu G; Gil B; Kim W; Park SY; Park J; Park J; Park H; Song W; Shin KE; Oh J; Yoon SH; Lee S; Lee Y; Lim WH; Jeong WG; Jung JI; Cha MJ; Choi S; In Choi H; Ham SY; Kim Y
Eur Radiol; 2021 Nov; 31(11):8147-8159. PubMed ID: 33884472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Performance of the Vancouver Risk Calculator Compared with Lung-RADS in an Urban, Diverse Clinical Lung Cancer Screening Cohort.
Kessler A; Peng R; Mardakhaev E; Haramati LB; White CS
Radiol Imaging Cancer; 2020 Mar; 2(2):e190021. PubMed ID: 33778703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Application of computer-aided diagnosis for Lung-RADS categorization in CT screening for lung cancer: effect on inter-reader agreement.
Park S; Park H; Lee SM; Ahn Y; Kim W; Jung K; Seo JB
Eur Radiol; 2022 Feb; 32(2):1054-1064. PubMed ID: 34331112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of ultra-low dose chest CT scanning protocols for the detection of pulmonary nodules: a phantom study.
Milanese G; Silva M; Frauenfelder T; Eberhard M; Sabia F; Martini C; Marchianò A; Prokop M; Sverzellati N; Pastorino U
Tumori; 2019 Oct; 105(5):394-403. PubMed ID: 31041885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Interobserver variability in Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System categorisation in subsolid nodule-enriched lung cancer screening CTs.
Yoon SH; Kim YJ; Doh K; Kim J; Lee KH; Lee KW; Kim J
Eur Radiol; 2021 Sep; 31(9):7184-7191. PubMed ID: 33733688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Outcomes of Positive and Suspicious Findings in Clinical Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening and the Road Ahead.
Regis SM; Borondy-Kitts A; McKee AB; Rieger-Christ K; Sands J; Afnan J; McKee BJ
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2022 Aug; 19(8):1371-1378. PubMed ID: 34818144
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison Between Radiological Semantic Features and Lung-RADS in Predicting Malignancy of Screen-Detected Lung Nodules in the National Lung Screening Trial.
Li Q; Balagurunathan Y; Liu Y; Qi J; Schabath MB; Ye Z; Gillies RJ
Clin Lung Cancer; 2018 Mar; 19(2):148-156.e3. PubMed ID: 29137847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of Lung Cancer Risk Among Persons Undergoing Screening or Guideline-Concordant Monitoring of Lung Nodules in the Mississippi Delta.
Osarogiagbon RU; Liao W; Faris NR; Fehnel C; Goss J; Shepherd CJ; Qureshi T; Matthews AT; Smeltzer MP; Pinsky PF
JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Feb; 6(2):e230787. PubMed ID: 36848089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of malignancy with thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TI-RADS) in thyroid nodules with persistent nondiagnostic cytology.
Başer H; Topaloğlu O; Fakı S; Alkan A; Yazıcıoğlu MÖ; Doğan HT; Kılınç İ; Ersoy R; Çakır B
Turk J Med Sci; 2019 Jun; 49(3):907-913. PubMed ID: 31195788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The use of modified TI-RADS using contrast-enhanced ultrasound features for classification purposes in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules: A prospective and multi-center study.
Zhou P; Chen F; Zhou P; Xu L; Wang L; Wang Z; Yu Y; Liu X; Wang B; Yan W; Zhou H; Tao Y; Liu W
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2023; 14():1080908. PubMed ID: 36817602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Modified Lung-RADS Improves Performance of Screening LDCT in a Population with High Prevalence of Non-smoking-related Lung Cancer.
Hsu HT; Tang EK; Wu MT; Wu CC; Liang CH; Chen CS; Mar GY; Lai RS; Wang JC; Wu CL; Huang YL; Wu FZ
Acad Radiol; 2018 Oct; 25(10):1240-1251. PubMed ID: 29530488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Relationship between nodule count and lung cancer probability in baseline CT lung cancer screening: The NELSON study.
Heuvelmans MA; Walter JE; Peters RB; Bock GH; Yousaf-Khan U; Aalst CMV; Groen HJM; Nackaerts K; Ooijen PMV; Koning HJ; Oudkerk M; Vliegenthart R
Lung Cancer; 2017 Nov; 113():45-50. PubMed ID: 29110848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Lung Cancer Screening in Clinical Practice: A 5-Year Review of Frequency and Predictors of Lung Cancer in the Screened Population.
Lafata KJ; Read C; Tong BC; Akinyemiju T; Wang C; Cerullo M; Tailor TD
J Am Coll Radiol; 2024 May; 21(5):767-777. PubMed ID: 37952807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A Decision Analysis of Follow-up and Treatment Algorithms for Nonsolid Pulmonary Nodules.
Hammer MM; Palazzo LL; Eckel AL; Barbosa EM; Kong CY
Radiology; 2019 Feb; 290(2):506-513. PubMed ID: 30457486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effectiveness of Lung-RADS in Reducing False-Positive Results in a Diverse, Underserved, Urban Lung Cancer Screening Cohort.
Kaminetzky M; Milch HS; Shmukler A; Kessler A; Peng R; Mardakhaev E; Bellin EY; Levsky JM; Haramati LB
J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Apr; 16(4 Pt A):419-426. PubMed ID: 30146484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
