These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37956865)

  • 1. The Role of State and Trait Self-Control on the Sustained Attention to Response Task.
    Harwood AE; Satterfield K; Helton WS; McKnight PE; Shaw TH
    Hum Factors; 2024 Oct; 66(10):2366-2378. PubMed ID: 37956865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sustained attention failures are primarily due to sustained cognitive load not task monotony.
    Head J; Helton WS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Nov; 153():87-94. PubMed ID: 25310454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prolonging the response movement inhibits the feed-forward motor program in the sustained attention to response task.
    Wilson KM; de Joux NR; Finkbeiner KM; Russell PN; Retzler JR; Helton WS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Feb; 183():75-84. PubMed ID: 29351864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Go-stimuli proportion influences response strategy in a sustained attention to response task.
    Wilson KM; Finkbeiner KM; de Joux NR; Russell PN; Helton WS
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Oct; 234(10):2989-98. PubMed ID: 27329605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Global interference and spatial uncertainty in the Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART).
    Helton WS; Weil L; Middlemiss A; Sawers A
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 20138552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptual decoupling or motor decoupling?
    Head J; Helton WS
    Conscious Cogn; 2013 Sep; 22(3):913-9. PubMed ID: 23838467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spider stimuli improve response inhibition.
    Wilson KM; Russell PN; Helton WS
    Conscious Cogn; 2015 May; 33():406-13. PubMed ID: 25770464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new perspective on the interplay between self-control and cognitive performance: Modeling progressive depletion patterns.
    Lindner C; Nagy G; Ramos Arhuis WA; Retelsdorf J
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0180149. PubMed ID: 28662176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. You are measuring the decision to be fast, not inattention: the Sustained Attention to Response Task does not measure sustained attention.
    Dang JS; Figueroa IJ; Helton WS
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Aug; 236(8):2255-2262. PubMed ID: 29846798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Text-speak processing and the sustained attention to response task.
    Head J; Russell PN; Dorahy MJ; Neumann E; Helton WS
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Jan; 216(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 22052188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual decoupling in the sustained attention to response task is unlikely.
    Bedi A; Russell PN; Helton WS
    Exp Brain Res; 2024 Aug; 242(8):2033-2040. PubMed ID: 38958722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Worry alters speed-accuracy tradeoffs but does not impair sustained attention.
    Hallion LS; Kusmierski SN; Caulfield MK
    Behav Res Ther; 2020 May; 128():103597. PubMed ID: 32217356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Attention-Lapse and Motor Decoupling accounts of SART performance are not mutually exclusive.
    Seli P
    Conscious Cogn; 2016 Apr; 41():189-98. PubMed ID: 26946296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Target predictability, sustained attention, and response inhibition.
    Carter L; Russell PN; Helton WS
    Brain Cogn; 2013 Jun; 82(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 23501702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The quick and the dead: A paradigm for studying friendly fire.
    Munnik A; Näswall K; Woodward G; Helton WS
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Apr; 84():103032. PubMed ID: 31987515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of ego depletion on challenge and threat evaluations during a potentially stressful public speaking task.
    O'Brien J; Fryer S; Parker J; Moore L
    Anxiety Stress Coping; 2021 May; 34(3):266-278. PubMed ID: 33141603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The sustained attention to response task (SART) does not promote mindlessness during vigilance performance.
    Dillard MB; Warm JS; Funke GJ; Funke ME; Finomore VS; Matthews G; Shaw TH; Parasuraman R
    Hum Factors; 2014 Dec; 56(8):1364-79. PubMed ID: 25509819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliable- and unreliable-warning cues in the Sustained Attention to Response Task.
    Helton WS; Head J; Russell PN
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Mar; 209(3):401-7. PubMed ID: 21287153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of real-time performance feedback and performance emphasis on the sustained attention to response task (SART).
    Mensen JM; Dang JS; Stets AJ; Helton WS
    Psychol Res; 2022 Sep; 86(6):1972-1979. PubMed ID: 34623490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influences of task repetition, napping, time of day, and instruction on the Sustained Attention to Response Task.
    van Schie MK; Alblas EE; Thijs RD; Fronczek R; Lammers GJ; van Dijk JG
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2014; 36(10):1055-65. PubMed ID: 25494633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.