These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37957432)

  • 1. Development of an adaptive test of musical scene analysis abilities for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Hake R; Bürgel M; Nguyen NK; Greasley A; Müllensiefen D; Siedenburg K
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Sep; 56(6):5456-5481. PubMed ID: 37957432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can You Hear Out the Melody? Testing Musical Scene Perception in Young Normal-Hearing and Older Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Siedenburg K; Röttges S; Wagener KC; Hohmann V
    Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520945826. PubMed ID: 32895034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of the adaptive music perception test.
    Kirchberger MJ; Russo FA
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):217-28. PubMed ID: 25350404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differences in Perception of Musical Stimuli among Acoustic, Electric, and Combined Modality Listeners.
    Prentiss SM; Friedland DR; Nash JJ; Runge CL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 May; 26(5):494-501. PubMed ID: 26055838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tone, rhythm, and timbre perception in school-age children using cochlear implants and hearing aids.
    Innes-Brown H; Marozeau JP; Storey CM; Blamey PJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct; 24(9):789-806. PubMed ID: 24224987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Music perception in electric acoustic stimulation users as assessed by the Mu.S.I.C. test.
    Brockmeier SJ; Peterreins M; Lorens A; Vermeire K; Helbig S; Anderson I; Skarzynski H; Van de Heyning P; Gstoettner W; Kiefer J
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 67():70-80. PubMed ID: 19955723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing.
    Kong YY; Cruz R; Jones JA; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):173-85. PubMed ID: 15064662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of room acoustic parameters on speech and music perception among participants with cochlear implants.
    Eurich B; Klenzner T; Oehler M
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():122-132. PubMed ID: 30933704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The perception of prosody and associated auditory cues in early-implanted children: the role of auditory working memory and musical activities.
    Torppa R; Faulkner A; Huotilainen M; Järvikivi J; Lipsanen J; Laasonen M; Vainio M
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Mar; 53(3):182-91. PubMed ID: 24460045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of visual cues on difficulty ratings for segregation of musical streams in listeners with impaired hearing.
    Innes-Brown H; Marozeau J; Blamey P
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e29327. PubMed ID: 22195046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of a music perception test for adult hearing-aid users.
    Uys M; van Dijk C
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2011 Oct; 58():19-47. PubMed ID: 22216557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Turning down the noise: the benefit of musical training on the aging auditory brain.
    Alain C; Zendel BR; Hutka S; Bidelman GM
    Hear Res; 2014 Feb; 308():162-73. PubMed ID: 23831039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of temporal fine structure and signal envelope on auditory motion perception.
    Warnecke M; Peng ZE; Litovsky RY
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0238125. PubMed ID: 32822439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of musical and linguistic components in recognition of real-world musical excerpts by cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults.
    Gfeller K; Jiang D; Oleson JJ; Driscoll V; Olszewski C; Knutson JF; Turner C; Gantz B
    J Music Ther; 2012; 49(1):68-101. PubMed ID: 22803258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reverberation negatively impacts musical sound quality for cochlear implant users.
    Roy AT; Vigeant M; Munjal T; Carver C; Jiradejvong P; Limb CJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S105-13. PubMed ID: 26561881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Music perception by cochlear implant and normal hearing listeners as measured by the Montreal Battery for Evaluation of Amusia.
    Cooper WB; Tobey E; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):618-26. PubMed ID: 18469714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability measure of a clinical test: Appreciation of Music in Cochlear Implantees (AMICI).
    Cheng MY; Spitzer JB; Shafiro V; Sheft S; Mancuso D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):969-79. PubMed ID: 24384082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Musical Perception Assessment of People With Hearing Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Simões PN; Lüders D; José MR; Romanelli G; Lüders V; Santos RS; de Araújo CM
    Am J Audiol; 2021 Jun; 30(2):458-473. PubMed ID: 33784174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of Musical Training and Hearing Loss on Fundamental Frequency Discrimination and Temporal Fine Structure Processing: Psychophysics and Modeling.
    Bianchi F; Carney LH; Dau T; Santurette S
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2019 Jun; 20(3):263-277. PubMed ID: 30693416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory enhancement under simultaneous masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Kreft HA; Wojtczak M; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Feb; 143(2):901. PubMed ID: 29495696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.