These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37957680)

  • 21. Evaluation of the benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness of potential alternatives to iFOBT testing for colorectal cancer screening in Australia.
    Lew JB; St John DJB; Macrae FA; Emery JD; Ee HC; Jenkins MA; He E; Grogan P; Caruana M; Sarfati D; Greuter MJE; Coupé VMH; Canfell K
    Int J Cancer; 2018 Jul; 143(2):269-282. PubMed ID: 29441568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The National Bowel Cancer Screening Program: time to achieve its potential to save lives.
    Ee H; St John J
    Public Health Res Pract; 2019 Jul; 29(2):. PubMed ID: 31384889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Engaging lower screening groups: a field experiment to evaluate the impact of a multiwave national campaign on participation in the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program.
    Gascoyne C; Broun K; Morley B; Wyatt K; Feletto E; Durkin SJ
    BMJ Open; 2023 Mar; 13(3):e065124. PubMed ID: 36921953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Testing the effectiveness of a general practice intervention to improve uptake of colorectal cancer screening: a randomised controlled trial.
    Dodd N; Carey M; Mansfield E; Oldmeadow C; Evans TJ
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2019 Oct; 43(5):464-469. PubMed ID: 31268211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Longitudinal screening adherence in the Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program from 2006 to 2022.
    Worthington J; Kelly A; Lew JB; Ge H; Vasica C; Broun K; Canfell K; Feletto E
    Prev Med; 2024 Sep; 186():108095. PubMed ID: 39122018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of text-message reminders and telephone patient navigation to improve the uptake of faecal immunochemical test screening among non-responders in London: a randomised controlled trial protocol.
    Duffy T; Gil N; Siddique B; Duffy S; Prentice A; Marshall S; Djedovic NK; Lewis M; Ruwende J; von Wagner C; Kerrison R
    BMJ Open; 2024 Jun; 14(6):e079482. PubMed ID: 38909999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of two invitation-based methods for human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling with usual care among un- and under-screened Māori, Pacific and Asian women: study protocol for a randomised controlled community trial to examine the effect of self-sampling on participation in cervical-cancer screening.
    Brewer N; Bartholomew K; Maxwell A; Grant J; McPherson G; Wihongi H; Bromhead C; Scott N; Crengle S; Cunningham C; Douwes J; Potter JD
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Dec; 19(1):1198. PubMed ID: 31815615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Benefits, Harms, and Cost-Effectiveness of Potential Age Extensions to the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program in Australia.
    Lew JB; St John DJB; Macrae FA; Emery JD; Ee HC; Jenkins MA; He E; Grogan P; Caruana M; Greuter MJE; Coupé VMH; Canfell K
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2018 Dec; 27(12):1450-1461. PubMed ID: 30190276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Survival impact of the Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.
    Ananda S; Wong H; Faragher I; Jones IT; Steele M; Kosmider S; Desai J; Tie J; Field K; Wong R; Tran B; Bae S; Gibbs P
    Intern Med J; 2016 Feb; 46(2):166-71. PubMed ID: 26418334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Faecal occult blood testing (FOBT)-based colorectal cancer screening trends and predictors of non-use: findings from the South Australian setting and implications for increasing FOBT uptake.
    Todorov K; Wilson C; Sharplin G; Corsini N
    Aust Health Rev; 2018 Feb; 42(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 28248632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Impact of a mass media campaign on participation rates in a National Bowel Cancer Screening Program: a field experiment.
    Durkin SJ; Broun K; Spittal MJ; Wakefield MA
    BMJ Open; 2019 Jan; 9(1):e024267. PubMed ID: 30813110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. General practice perspectives on a bowel cancer screening quality improvement intervention using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.
    Holden CA; Turnbull D; Frank OR; Olver I
    Public Health Res Pract; 2021 Sep; 31(3):. PubMed ID: 34494074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Text Reminders in Colorectal Cancer Screening (TRICCS): Protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Hirst Y; Kerrison R; Kobayashi LC; Counsell N; Djedovic N; Ruwende J; Stewart M; von Wagner C
    BMC Public Health; 2016 Jan; 16():74. PubMed ID: 26809344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A targeted promotional DVD fails to improve Māori and Pacific participation rates in the New Zealand bowel screening pilot: results from a pseudo-randomised controlled trial.
    Bartholomew K; Zhou L; Crengle S; Buswell E; Buckley A; Sandiford P
    BMC Public Health; 2019 Sep; 19(1):1245. PubMed ID: 31500594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. What can We Learn From High-Performing Screening Programs to Increase Bowel Cancer Screening Participation in Australia?
    Flander L; Dekker E; Andersen B; Larsen MB; Steele RJ; Malila N; Sarkeala T; van der Vlugt M; de Klerk C; Knottnerus B; Bertels L; Woudstra A; Spaander MCW; Fransen M; Heinavaara S; Dillon M; Ait Ouakrim D; Jenkins M
    Cancer Control; 2022; 29():10732748221121383. PubMed ID: 35969473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prevalence of FOB testing in eastern-Australian general practice patients: what has a national bowel cancer screening program delivered?
    Paul CL; Carey ML; Russell G; D'Este C; Sanson-Fisher RW; Zwar N
    Health Promot J Austr; 2015 Apr; 26(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 25818504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effectiveness of internet-delivered education and home exercise supported by behaviour change SMS on pain and function for people with knee osteoarthritis: a randomised controlled trial protocol.
    Nelligan RK; Hinman RS; Kasza J; Bennell KL
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Jul; 20(1):342. PubMed ID: 31351449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Personalized colorectal cancer screening: study protocol of a mixed-methods study on the effectiveness of tailored intervals based on prior f-Hb concentration in a fit-based colorectal cancer screening program (PERFECT-FIT).
    Breekveldt ECH; Toes-Zoutendijk E; de Jonge L; Spaander MCW; Dekker E; van Kemenade FJ; van Vuuren AJ; Ramakers CRB; Nagtegaal ID; van Leerdam ME; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2023 Feb; 23(1):45. PubMed ID: 36814185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Bowel cancer screening--a role for general practice.
    Foreman L
    Aust Fam Physician; 2009 Apr; 38(4):200-3. PubMed ID: 19350068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Improving colonoscopy prioritisation and promoting the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program: keys to reducing bowel cancer burden.
    Grogan P; He E; Pockney P
    Public Health Res Pract; 2023 Mar; 33(1):. PubMed ID: 36918394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.