160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37958330)
1. A Mouse-Specific Model to Detect Genes under Selection in Tumors.
Chen H; Shu J; Maley CC; Liu L
Cancers (Basel); 2023 Oct; 15(21):. PubMed ID: 37958330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Somatic selection distinguishes oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes.
Chandrashekar P; Ahmadinejad N; Wang J; Sekulic A; Egan JB; Asmann YW; Kumar S; Maley C; Liu L
Bioinformatics; 2020 Mar; 36(6):1712-1717. PubMed ID: 32176769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Machine Learning Classification and Structure-Functional Analysis of Cancer Mutations Reveal Unique Dynamic and Network Signatures of Driver Sites in Oncogenes and Tumor Suppressor Genes.
Agajanian S; Odeyemi O; Bischoff N; Ratra S; Verkhivker GM
J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Oct; 58(10):2131-2150. PubMed ID: 30253099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identification of new driver and passenger mutations within APOBEC-induced hotspot mutations in bladder cancer.
Shi MJ; Meng XY; Fontugne J; Chen CL; Radvanyi F; Bernard-Pierrot I
Genome Med; 2020 Sep; 12(1):85. PubMed ID: 32988402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Integrative Method Based on the Module-Network for Identifying Driver Genes in Cancer Subtypes.
Lu X; Li X; Liu P; Qian X; Miao Q; Peng S
Molecules; 2018 Jan; 23(2):. PubMed ID: 29364829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Distinguishing between cancer driver and passenger gene alteration candidates via cross-species comparison: a pilot study.
Ji X; Tang J; Halberg R; Busam D; Ferriera S; Peña MM; Venkataramu C; Yeatman TJ; Zhao S
BMC Cancer; 2010 Aug; 10():426. PubMed ID: 20707908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multi-Omic Data Improve Prediction of Personalized Tumor Suppressors and Oncogenes.
Sudhakar M; Rengaswamy R; Raman K
Front Genet; 2022; 13():854190. PubMed ID: 35620468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A workflow to study mechanistic indicators for driver gene prediction with Moonlight.
Nourbakhsh M; Saksager A; Tom N; Chen XS; Colaprico A; Olsen C; Tiberti M; Papaleo E
Brief Bioinform; 2023 Sep; 24(5):. PubMed ID: 37551622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ontology-based prediction of cancer driver genes.
Althubaiti S; Karwath A; Dallol A; Noor A; Alkhayyat SS; Alwassia R; Mineta K; Gojobori T; Beggs AD; Schofield PN; Gkoutos GV; Hoehndorf R
Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):17405. PubMed ID: 31757986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. LOTUS: A single- and multitask machine learning algorithm for the prediction of cancer driver genes.
Collier O; Stoven V; Vert JP
PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Sep; 15(9):e1007381. PubMed ID: 31568528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cross-species DNA copy number analyses identifies multiple 1q21-q23 subtype-specific driver genes for breast cancer.
Silva GO; He X; Parker JS; Gatza ML; Carey LA; Hou JP; Moulder SL; Marcom PK; Ma J; Rosen JM; Perou CM
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Jul; 152(2):347-56. PubMed ID: 26109346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. SomInaClust: detection of cancer genes based on somatic mutation patterns of inactivation and clustering.
Van den Eynden J; Fierro AC; Verbeke LP; Marchal K
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Apr; 16():125. PubMed ID: 25903787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. GenomeTornadoPlot: a novel R package for CNV visualization and focality analysis.
Hong C; Thiele R; Feuerbach L
Bioinformatics; 2022 Mar; 38(7):2036-2038. PubMed ID: 35099519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. driveR: a novel method for prioritizing cancer driver genes using somatic genomics data.
Ülgen E; Sezerman OU
BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 May; 22(1):263. PubMed ID: 34030627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. OncodriveCLUSTL: a sequence-based clustering method to identify cancer drivers.
Arnedo-Pac C; Mularoni L; Muiños F; Gonzalez-Perez A; Lopez-Bigas N
Bioinformatics; 2019 Nov; 35(22):4788-4790. PubMed ID: 31228182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating the evaluation of cancer driver genes.
Tokheim CJ; Papadopoulos N; Kinzler KW; Vogelstein B; Karchin R
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Dec; 113(50):14330-14335. PubMed ID: 27911828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. VarWalker: personalized mutation network analysis of putative cancer genes from next-generation sequencing data.
Jia P; Zhao Z
PLoS Comput Biol; 2014 Feb; 10(2):e1003460. PubMed ID: 24516372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. DriverRWH: discovering cancer driver genes by random walk on a gene mutation hypergraph.
Wang C; Shi J; Cai J; Zhang Y; Zheng X; Zhang N
BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Jul; 23(1):277. PubMed ID: 35831792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MM2S: personalized diagnosis of medulloblastoma patients and model systems.
Gendoo DM; Haibe-Kains B
Source Code Biol Med; 2016; 11():6. PubMed ID: 27069505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Claudin-low-like mouse mammary tumors show distinct transcriptomic patterns uncoupled from genomic drivers.
Fougner C; Bergholtz H; Kuiper R; Norum JH; Sørlie T
Breast Cancer Res; 2019 Jul; 21(1):85. PubMed ID: 31366361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
