These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3795886)

  • 1. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing. II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech.
    Picheny MA; Durlach NI; Braida LD
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Dec; 29(4):434-46. PubMed ID: 3795886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing. III: An attempt to determine the contribution of speaking rate to differences in intelligibility between clear and conversational speech.
    Picheny MA; Durlach NI; Braida LD
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Sep; 32(3):600-3. PubMed ID: 2779204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing IV: Further studies of the role of speaking rate.
    Uchanski RM; Choi SS; Braida LD; Reed CM; Durlach NI
    J Speech Hear Res; 1996 Jun; 39(3):494-509. PubMed ID: 8783129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acoustic properties of naturally produced clear speech at normal speaking rates.
    Krause JC; Braida LD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jan; 115(1):362-78. PubMed ID: 14759028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing I: Intelligibility differences between clear and conversational speech.
    Picheny MA; Durlach NI; Braida LD
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Mar; 28(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 3982003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating the role of spectral and envelope characteristics in the intelligibility advantage of clear speech.
    Krause JC; Braida LD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3346-57. PubMed ID: 19425675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigating alternative forms of clear speech: the effects of speaking rate and speaking mode on intelligibility.
    Krause JC; Braida LD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Nov; 112(5 Pt 1):2165-72. PubMed ID: 12430828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Payton KL; Uchanski RM; Braida LD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Mar; 95(3):1581-92. PubMed ID: 8176061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
    Maniwa K; Jongman A; Wade T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1114-25. PubMed ID: 18247912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speaking Clearly for Older Adults With Normal Hearing: The Role of Speaking Rate.
    Krause JC; Panagiotopoulos AP
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Oct; 62(10):3851-3859. PubMed ID: 31580758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: vowel intelligibility for normal-hearing listeners.
    Ferguson SH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2365-73. PubMed ID: 15532667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: acoustic characteristics of vowels.
    Ferguson SH; Kewley-Port D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Oct; 50(5):1241-55. PubMed ID: 17905909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vowel intelligibility in clear and conversational speech for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Ferguson SH; Kewley-Port D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jul; 112(1):259-71. PubMed ID: 12141351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An Acoustic-Phonetic Approach to Effects of Face Masks on Speech Intelligibility.
    Kim Y; Thompson A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 65(12):4679-4689. PubMed ID: 36351244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The contribution of obstruent consonants and acoustic landmarks to speech recognition in noise.
    Li N; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3947. PubMed ID: 19206819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hybridizing conversational and clear speech to determine the degree of contribution of acoustic features to intelligibility.
    Kain A; Amano-Kusumoto A; Hosom JP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2308-19. PubMed ID: 19062869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal properties in clear speech perception.
    Liu S; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jul; 120(1):424-32. PubMed ID: 16875238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effectiveness of clear speech as a masker.
    Calandruccio L; Van Engen K; Dhar S; Bradlow AR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 53(6):1458-71. PubMed ID: 20689024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clear speech and lexical competition in younger and older adult listeners.
    Van Engen KJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):1067. PubMed ID: 28863602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fundamental frequency range and other acoustic factors that might contribute to the clear-speech benefit.
    Han HJ; Munson B; Schlauch RS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Mar; 149(3):1685. PubMed ID: 33765811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.