These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3795887)

  • 1. Application of the Articulation Index and the Speech Transmission Index to the recognition of speech by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Humes LE; Dirks DD; Bell TS; Ahlstrom C; Kincaid GE
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Dec; 29(4):447-62. PubMed ID: 3795887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Payton KL; Uchanski RM; Braida LD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Mar; 95(3):1581-92. PubMed ID: 8176061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceived listening effort and speech intelligibility in reverberation and noise for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Schepker H; Haeder K; Rennies J; Holube I
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Dec; 55(12):738-747. PubMed ID: 27627181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. II: Articulation index predictions.
    Dubno JR; Dirks DD; Schaefer AB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):355-64. PubMed ID: 2921418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech recognition and the Articulation Index for normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Kamm CA; Dirks DD; Bell TS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Jan; 77(1):281-8. PubMed ID: 3973220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hearing loss, aging, and speech perception in reverberation and noise.
    Helfer KS; Wilber LA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Mar; 33(1):149-55. PubMed ID: 2314073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Application of the articulation index to the speech recognition of normal and impaired listeners wearing hearing protection.
    Wilde G; Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Mar; 87(3):1192-9. PubMed ID: 2324388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prediction of speech intelligibility for normal-hearing and cochlearly hearing-impaired listeners.
    Ludvigsen C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Oct; 82(4):1162-71. PubMed ID: 3680775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
    Maniwa K; Jongman A; Wade T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1114-25. PubMed ID: 18247912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Further validation of the Speech Transmission Index (STI).
    Humes LE; Boney S; Loven F
    J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Sep; 30(3):403-10. PubMed ID: 3669647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of the articulation index for assessing residual auditory function in listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment.
    Pavlovic CV
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Apr; 75(4):1253-8. PubMed ID: 6725776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Audibility-index predictions of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' performance on the connected speech test.
    Sherbecoe RL; Studebaker GA
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 12598814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of the influence of reverberation on binaural speech intelligibility in noise and in quiet.
    Rennies J; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2999-3012. PubMed ID: 22087928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of degradation of intensity, time, or frequency content on speech intelligibility for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    van Schijndel NH; Houtgast T; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jul; 110(1):529-42. PubMed ID: 11508977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measuring the effects of reverberation and noise on sentence intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners.
    George EL; Goverts ST; Festen JM; Houtgast T
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 53(6):1429-39. PubMed ID: 20689027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Hogan CA; Turner CW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jul; 104(1):432-41. PubMed ID: 9670535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory inspired machine learning techniques can improve speech intelligibility and quality for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Monaghan JJ; Goehring T; Yang X; Bolner F; Wang S; Wright MC; Bleeck S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1985. PubMed ID: 28372043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.