These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37960704)

  • 1. Smartphone Photogrammetric Assessment for Head Measurements.
    Quispe-Enriquez OC; Valero-Lanzuela JJ; Lerma JL
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Nov; 23(21):. PubMed ID: 37960704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Craniofacial 3D Morphometric Analysis with Smartphone-Based Photogrammetry.
    Quispe-Enriquez OC; Valero-Lanzuela JJ; Lerma JL
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Dec; 24(1):. PubMed ID: 38203091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Low-Cost Smartphone-Based Photogrammetry for the Analysis of Cranial Deformation in Infants.
    Barbero-García I; Lerma JL; Marqués-Mateu Á; Miranda P
    World Neurosurg; 2017 Jun; 102():545-554. PubMed ID: 28300713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [3D-imaging and analysis for plastic surgery by smartphone and tablet: an alternative to professional systems?].
    Koban KC; Leitsch S; Holzbach T; Volkmer E; Metz PM; Giunta RE
    Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2014 Apr; 46(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 24777459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neuroanatomical photogrammetric models using smartphones: a comparison of apps.
    Piazza A; Corvino S; Ballesteros D; Campeggi A; Agosti E; Serioli S; Corrivetti F; Bortolotti C; De Notaris M
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2024 Sep; 166(1):378. PubMed ID: 39316122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of Cranial Shape Measurements Using Smartphones: A Prospective Study.
    Kocabalkanli C; Fenton R; Gaetani S; Aalamifar F; Linguraru MG; Seifabadi R
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2024 Aug; ():10556656241271681. PubMed ID: 39135458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Simple Way to Reduce 3D Model Deformation in Smartphone Photogrammetry.
    Jasińska A; Pyka K; Pastucha E; Midtiby HS
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jan; 23(2):. PubMed ID: 36679525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Reliability of iWitness photogrammetry in maxillofacial application].
    Jiang C; Song Q; He W; Chen S; Hong T
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2015 Jun; 33(3):296-300. PubMed ID: 26281261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Method for Economical Smartphone-Based Clinical 3D Facial Scanning.
    Nightingale RC; Ross MT; Allenby MC; Woodruff MA; Powell SK
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Dec; 29(9):818-825. PubMed ID: 33089546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frugal 3D scanning using smartphones provides an accessible framework for capturing the external ear.
    Nightingale RC; Ross MT; Cruz RLJ; Allenby MC; Powell SK; Woodruff MA
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2021 Nov; 74(11):3066-3072. PubMed ID: 34088646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of three-dimensional photogrammetric images in non-synostotic cranial deformities.
    Schaaf H; Pons-Kuehnemann J; Malik CY; Streckbein P; Preuss M; Howaldt HP; Wilbrand JF
    Neuropediatrics; 2010 Feb; 41(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 20571987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validity and reliability of three-dimensional modeling of orthodontic dental casts using smartphone-based photogrammetric technology.
    Al-Rudainy D; Adel Al-Lami H; Yang L
    J World Fed Orthod; 2023 Feb; 12(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 36528481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enhancement of Neurocognitive Assessments Using Smartphone Capabilities: Systematic Review.
    Templeton JM; Poellabauer C; Schneider S
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Jun; 8(6):e15517. PubMed ID: 32442150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A smartphone photogrammetry method for digitizing prosthetic socket interiors.
    Hernandez A; Lemaire E
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Apr; 41(2):210-214. PubMed ID: 27613588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An in vitro study of digital impressions and three-dimensional printed models of orbital defects using mobile devices and monoscopic photogrammetry.
    Tabira K; Kawaguchi R; Mine Y; Iwaguro S; Peng TY; Tsuchida Y; Takayama Y; Okazaki S; Taji T; Murayama T
    J Oral Sci; 2023; 65(2):127-130. PubMed ID: 36990757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of acute burns diagnosis made using smartphones and tablets: a questionnaire-based study among medical experts.
    Blom L; Boissin C; Allorto N; Wallis L; Hasselberg M; Laflamme L
    BMC Emerg Med; 2017 Dec; 17(1):39. PubMed ID: 29237400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Standard methods for creating digital skeletal models using structure-from-motion photogrammetry.
    Morgan B; Ford ALJ; Smith MJ
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2019 May; 169(1):152-160. PubMed ID: 30784038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validity of the 3D VECTRA photogrammetric surface imaging system for cranio-maxillofacial anthropometric measurements.
    Metzler P; Sun Y; Zemann W; Bartella A; Lehner M; Obwegeser JA; Kruse-Gujer AL; Lübbers HT
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 18(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 23559195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Image-based teleconsultation using smartphones or tablets: qualitative assessment of medical experts.
    Boissin C; Blom L; Wallis L; Laflamme L
    Emerg Med J; 2017 Feb; 34(2):95-99. PubMed ID: 27707791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anthropometric precision and accuracy of digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: comparing the Genex and 3dMD imaging systems with one another and with direct anthropometry.
    Weinberg SM; Naidoo S; Govier DP; Martin RA; Kane AA; Marazita ML
    J Craniofac Surg; 2006 May; 17(3):477-83. PubMed ID: 16770184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.