BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37962134)

  • 1. The Controversy and Value of Mohs Micrographic Surgery for Melanoma and Melanoma in Situ on the Trunk and Extremities.
    Zitelli JA; Stiegel E; Brodland DG
    Dermatol Surg; 2023 Dec; 49(12):1061-1065. PubMed ID: 37962134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term outcomes of Mohs micrographic surgery for invasive melanoma of the trunk and proximal portion of the extremities.
    Burnett ME; Brodland DG; Zitelli JA
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2021 Mar; 84(3):661-668. PubMed ID: 32763327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) for melanoma in situ (MIS) of the trunk and proximal extremities.
    Stigall LE; Brodland DG; Zitelli JA
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2016 Nov; 75(5):1015-1021. PubMed ID: 27473456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Treating melanoma in situ and lentigo maligna with Mohs micrographic surgery in Australia.
    Foxton GC; Elliott TG; Litterick KA
    Australas J Dermatol; 2019 Feb; 60(1):33-37. PubMed ID: 29932208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Association of Mohs Micrographic Surgery vs Wide Local Excision With Overall Survival Outcomes for Patients With Melanoma of the Trunk and Extremities.
    Demer AM; Hanson JL; Maher IA; Liszewski W
    JAMA Dermatol; 2021 Jan; 157(1):84-89. PubMed ID: 33084853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surgical margins for excision of primary cutaneous melanoma.
    Zitelli JA; Brown CD; Hanusa BH
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1997 Sep; 37(3 Pt 1):422-9. PubMed ID: 9308558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The rule of 10s versus the rule of 2s: High complication rates after conventional excision with postoperative margin assessment of specialty site versus trunk and proximal extremity melanomas.
    Rzepecki AK; Hwang CD; Etzkorn JR; Shin TM; Sobanko JF; Howe NM; Miller CJ
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2021 Aug; 85(2):442-452. PubMed ID: 30447316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Morbidity and Mortality of Melanoma on the Trunk and Extremities Treated With Mohs Surgery Versus Wide Excision: A Systematic Review.
    Bednar ED; Zon M; Abu-Hilal M
    Dermatol Surg; 2022 Jan; 48(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 34608076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Local Recurrence Rates of Malignant Melanoma After Mohs Micrographic Surgery Are Lowest With 5- to 10-mm Initial Margins: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Campbell EH; Crum OM; Chelf CJ; Demer AM; Brewer JD
    Dermatol Surg; 2023 Feb; 49(2):119-123. PubMed ID: 36728060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mohs micrographic surgery for the treatment of primary cutaneous melanoma.
    Zitelli JA; Brown C; Hanusa BH
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1997 Aug; 37(2 Pt 1):236-45. PubMed ID: 9270510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Invasive Melanoma and Melanoma in Situ Treated With Modified Mohs Micrographic Surgery With En Face Permanent Sectioning: A 10-Year Retrospective Review.
    Heath M; Woody M; Leitenberger J; Latour E; Bar A
    Dermatol Surg; 2020 Aug; 46(8):1004-1013. PubMed ID: 31714384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Low recurrence rates for in situ and invasive melanomas using Mohs micrographic surgery with melanoma antigen recognized by T cells 1 (MART-1) immunostaining: tissue processing methodology to optimize pathologic staging and margin assessment.
    Etzkorn JR; Sobanko JF; Elenitsas R; Newman JG; Goldbach H; Shin TM; Miller CJ
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2015 May; 72(5):840-50. PubMed ID: 25774012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mohs Micrographic Surgery for Melanoma: Evidence, Controversy, and a Critical Review of Excisional Margin Guidelines.
    Brodland DG
    Dermatol Clin; 2023 Jan; 41(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 36410985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Desmoplastic melanoma treated with wide local excision or Mohs micrographic surgery: Rates of positive margins, local recurrence, and repeat surgeries.
    Ran NA; Nugent ST; Veerabagu SA; Chu EY; Modi MB; Sobanko JF; Etzkorn JR; Shin TM; Higgins HW; Giordano CN; McMurray SL; Walker JL; Stull CM; Miller CJ
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2022 Dec; 87(6):1376-1378. PubMed ID: 35963290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Upstaging of melanoma in situ and lentigo maligna treated with Mohs micrographic surgery rarely results in additional surgical management.
    Levoska MA; Schmults CD; Waldman AH
    Arch Dermatol Res; 2020 Dec; 312(10):753-756. PubMed ID: 32002653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Melanomas of the head and neck have high-local recurrence risk features and require tissue-rearranging reconstruction more commonly than basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma: A comparison of indications for microscopic margin control prior to reconstruction in 13,664 tumors.
    Fix W; Etzkorn JR; Shin TM; Howe N; Bhatt M; Sobanko JF; Miller CJ
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2021 Aug; 85(2):409-418. PubMed ID: 30458206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mohs micrographic surgery for melanoma: A prospective multicenter study.
    Ellison PM; Zitelli JA; Brodland DG
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2019 Sep; 81(3):767-774. PubMed ID: 31150700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mohs Micrographic Surgery for the Treatment of Cutaneous Melanomas of the Head and Neck.
    Jacobsen ES; Soleymani T
    Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2022 May; 34(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 35428505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mohs Micrographic Surgery Using MART-1 Immunostain in the Treatment of Invasive Melanoma and Melanoma In Situ.
    Valentín-Nogueras SM; Brodland DG; Zitelli JA; González-Sepúlveda L; Nazario CM
    Dermatol Surg; 2016 Jun; 42(6):733-44. PubMed ID: 27158886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cutaneous head and neck melanoma treated with Mohs micrographic surgery.
    Bricca GM; Brodland DG; Ren D; Zitelli JA
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2005 Jan; 52(1):92-100. PubMed ID: 15627086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.