145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37962372)
1. Single use flexible ureteroscopes: a review of current technologies and cost effectiveness analysis.
Talyshinskii A; Gauhar V; Castellani D; Knoll T; Shah K; Wan SP; Somani BK
Curr Opin Urol; 2024 Mar; 34(2):110-115. PubMed ID: 37962372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Flexible ureteroscopy: reuse? Or is single use the new direction?
Ventimiglia E; Somani BK; Traxer O
Curr Opin Urol; 2020 Mar; 30(2):113-119. PubMed ID: 31815748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can the introduction of single-use flexible ureteroscopes increase the longevity of reusable flexible ureteroscopes at a high volume centre?
Ventimiglia E; Smyth N; Doizi S; Jiménez Godínez A; Barghouthy Y; Corrales Acosta MA; Kamkoum H; Somani B; Traxer O
World J Urol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):251-256. PubMed ID: 34424373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost comparison of single-use versus reusable flexible ureteroscope: A systematic review.
Ventimiglia E; Godínez AJ; Traxer O; Somani BK
Turk J Urol; 2020 Nov; 46(Supp. 1):S40-S45. PubMed ID: 32877637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retrospective Cost Analysis of a Single-Center Reusable Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Program: A Comparative Cost Simulation of Disposable fURS as an Alternative.
Ozimek T; Schneider MH; Hupe MC; Wiessmeyer JR; Cordes J; Chlosta PL; Merseburger AS; Kramer MW
J Endourol; 2017 Dec; 31(12):1226-1230. PubMed ID: 29073769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Single-use
Bragaru M; Multescu R; Georgescu D; Bulai C; Ene C; Popescu R; Geavlete P; Geavlete B
J Med Life; 2023 Jan; 16(1):10-15. PubMed ID: 36873117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative medico-economic study of reusable vs. single-use flexible ureteroscopes.
Al-Balushi K; Martin N; Loubon H; Baboudjian M; Michel F; Sichez PC; Martin T; Di-Crocco E; Gaillet S; Delaporte V; Akiki A; Faure A; Karsenty G; Lechevallier E; Boissier R
Int Urol Nephrol; 2019 Oct; 51(10):1735-1741. PubMed ID: 31317310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Use and Reusable Flexible Ureteroscopes for Renal Stone Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Jun DY; Cho KS; Jeong JY; Moon YJ; Kang DH; Jung HD; Lee JY
Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Oct; 58(10):. PubMed ID: 36295549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. An in vitro Comparative Assessment of Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscopes Using a Standardized Ureteroscopy Training Model.
So WZ; Gauhar V; Chen K; Lu J; Chua WJ; Tiong HY
Urol Int; 2022; 106(12):1279-1286. PubMed ID: 35709703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Repair Rate and Associated Costs of Reusable Flexible Ureteroscopes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Rindorf DK; Tailly T; Kamphuis GM; Larsen S; Somani BK; Traxer O; Koo K
Eur Urol Open Sci; 2022 Mar; 37():64-72. PubMed ID: 35128483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laser fibre, rather than the stone, may harm the scope: retrospective monocentric analysis of 26 pre- and intraoperative factors of flexible ureteroscope (fURS) damage.
Ozimek T; Cordes J; Gilbert N; Hupe MC; Wiessmeyer JR; Schneider MH; Merseburger AS; Kramer MW
World J Urol; 2020 Aug; 38(8):2035-2040. PubMed ID: 31659464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of pre- and post-surgical images of reusable and single use flexible ureteroscopes: a qualitative analysis.
Domenech A; Alliende C; Vivaldi B; Pizzi P
Cent European J Urol; 2021; 74(3):459-463. PubMed ID: 34729238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Single-use flexible ureteropyeloscopy: a systematic review.
Davis NF; Quinlan MR; Browne C; Bhatt NR; Manecksha RP; D'Arcy FT; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton DM
World J Urol; 2018 Apr; 36(4):529-536. PubMed ID: 29177820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficiency of retrograde intrarenal surgery in lower pole stones: disposable flexible ureterorenoscope or reusable flexible ureterorenoscope?
Göger YE; Özkent MS; Kılınç MT; Taşkapu HH; Göger E; Aydın A; Sönmez MG; Karalezli G
World J Urol; 2021 Sep; 39(9):3643-3650. PubMed ID: 33738574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscopes as a Safe and Effective Choice for the Treatment of Lower Pole Renal Stones: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized-Controlled Trial.
Yang E; Jing S; Niu Y; Qi S; Yadav PK; Yang L; Bao J; Tian J; Wang J; Li N; Ou T; Wang Z
J Endourol; 2021 Dec; 35(12):1773-1778. PubMed ID: 34375127
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of single-use flexible ureteroscopes with a reusable ureteroscope for the management of paediatric urolithiasis.
Mille E; El-Khoury E; Haddad M; Pinol J; Charbonnier M; Gastaldi P; Dariel A; Merrot T; Faure A
J Pediatr Urol; 2023 Jun; 19(3):248.e1-248.e6. PubMed ID: 36746718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Durability of current generation flexible ureteroscopes: the experience from a high-volume centre.
Vaddi CM; Ramakrishna P; Ganesan S; Swamy S; Anandan H; Babu M
Cent European J Urol; 2022; 75(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 35937666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reusable flexible ureterorenoscopes are more cost-effective than single-use scopes: results of a systematic review from PETRA Uro-group.
Talso M; Goumas IK; Kamphuis GM; Dragos L; Tefik T; Traxer O; Somani BK
Transl Androl Urol; 2019 Sep; 8(Suppl 4):S418-S425. PubMed ID: 31656747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscopes: How Difficult Is It Today to Stay Up to Date? A Pictorial Review of Instruments Available in Europe in 2023.
Vaccaro C; Lorusso V; Palmisano F; Rosso M; Nicola M; Granata AM; Gregori A; Talso M
J Clin Med; 2023 Dec; 12(24):. PubMed ID: 38137717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Decreasing cost of flexible ureterorenoscopy: single-use laser fiber cost analysis.
Chapman RA; Somani BK; Robertson A; Healy S; Kata SG
Urology; 2014 May; 83(5):1003-5. PubMed ID: 24529588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
