These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3796286)

  • 21. Time course of free-choice priming effects explained by a simple accumulator model.
    Mattler U; Palmer S
    Cognition; 2012 Jun; 123(3):347-60. PubMed ID: 22475294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Interactions between lateralized choices of hand and target.
    Gardinier J; Franco V; Schieber MH
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Apr; 170(2):149-59. PubMed ID: 16328287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of integrated feedback on discrete bimanual movements in choice reaction time.
    Blinch J; de Cellio Martins G; Chua R
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Jan; 235(1):247-257. PubMed ID: 27695912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Preference and performance measures of handedness.
    Brown SG; Roy EA; Rohr LE; Snider BR; Bryden PJ
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Jul; 55(2):283-5. PubMed ID: 15177796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Temporal preparation in aging: a functional MRI study.
    Vallesi A; McIntosh AR; Stuss DT
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Nov; 47(13):2876-81. PubMed ID: 19545578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Hand preference consistency and eye-hand coordination in young children during a motor task.
    Mori S; Iteya M; Gabbard C
    Percept Mot Skills; 2006 Feb; 102(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 16671594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [The time of a complex sensorimotor choice reaction in subjects with differing functional mobility of the nervous processes].
    Makarenko NV
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1989; 39(5):813-8. PubMed ID: 2603548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Response-repetition effects depend on motor set: evidence for anatomical coding in response selection.
    Adam JJ; Koch I
    Hum Mov Sci; 2014 Feb; 33():172-84. PubMed ID: 24075691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of foot and hand reaction times among men: a methodologic study using simple and multiple-choice repeated measurements.
    Simonen RL; Videman T; Battié MC; Gibbons LE
    Percept Mot Skills; 1995 Jun; 80(3 Pt 2):1243-9. PubMed ID: 7478883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Context effect in a temporal bisection task with the choice keys available during the sample.
    Oliveira L; Machado A
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):286-92. PubMed ID: 19162143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Representation of Behavioral Tactics and Tactics-Action Transformation in the Primate Medial Prefrontal Cortex.
    Matsuzaka Y; Tanji J; Mushiake H
    J Neurosci; 2016 Jun; 36(22):5974-87. PubMed ID: 27251619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Subclassification of non-pathological left-handers poses problems for theories of handedness.
    Peters M
    Neuropsychologia; 1990; 28(3):279-89. PubMed ID: 2325840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Intrinsic and extrinsic factors of turning preferences in humans.
    Lenoir M; Van Overschelde S; De Rycke M; Musch E
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Jan; 393(2-3):179-83. PubMed ID: 16257124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Planning keypress and reaching responses: effects of response location and number of potential effectors.
    Adam JJ; Taminiau B; van Veen N; Ament B; Rijcken JM; Meijer K; Pratt J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1464-78. PubMed ID: 19045986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Manual laterality and task complexity in De Brazza's monkey (Cercopithecus neglectus).
    Trouillard E; Blois-Heulin C
    Laterality; 2005 Jan; 10(1):7-27. PubMed ID: 15841820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Physiological evidence for response inhibition in choice reaction time tasks.
    Burle B; Vidal F; Tandonnet C; Hasbroucq T
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Nov; 56(2):153-64. PubMed ID: 15518932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Preparation of timing structure involves two independent sub-processes.
    Maslovat D; Chua R; Klapp ST; Franks IM
    Psychol Res; 2018 Sep; 82(5):981-996. PubMed ID: 28567604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Task alternation cost without task alternation: measuring intentionality.
    Yehene E; Meiran N; Soroker N
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(13):1858-69. PubMed ID: 16168729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Spatial S-R compatibility with unimanual two-finger choice reactions: effects of irrelevant stimulus location.
    Heister G; Ehrenstein WH; Schroeder-Heister P
    Percept Psychophys; 1987 Aug; 42(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 3627940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Information processing abilities and performance on two perceptual-motor tasks.
    Siegel D
    Percept Mot Skills; 1985 Apr; 60(2):459-66. PubMed ID: 4000862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.