These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37963487)

  • 1. Reflections on Cross-Modal Correspondences: Current Understanding and Issues for Future Research.
    Motoki K; Marks LE; Velasco C
    Multisens Res; 2023 Nov; 37(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 37963487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Synesthesia strengthens sound-symbolic cross-modal correspondences.
    Lacey S; Martinez M; McCormick K; Sathian K
    Eur J Neurosci; 2016 Nov; 44(9):2716-2721. PubMed ID: 27564319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temperature-Based Crossmodal Correspondences: Causes and Consequences.
    Spence C
    Multisens Res; 2020 Oct; 33(6):645-682. PubMed ID: 31923885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does cross-modal correspondence modulate modality-specific perceptual processing? Study using timing judgment tasks.
    Uno K; Yokosawa K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Jan; 86(1):273-284. PubMed ID: 37932495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of cross-modal correspondences on working memory performance.
    Brunetti R; Indraccolo A; Mastroberardino S; Spence C; Santangelo V
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Apr; 43(4):819-831. PubMed ID: 28345948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of visual experience in the emergence of cross-modal correspondences.
    Hamilton-Fletcher G; Pisanski K; Reby D; Stefańczyk M; Ward J; Sorokowska A
    Cognition; 2018 Jun; 175():114-121. PubMed ID: 29502009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. It does belong together: cross-modal correspondences influence cross-modal integration during perceptual learning.
    Brunel L; Carvalho PF; Goldstone RL
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():358. PubMed ID: 25914653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The size-brightness correspondence: evidence for crosstalk among aligned conceptual feature dimensions.
    Walker P; Walker L; Francis B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Nov; 77(8):2694-710. PubMed ID: 26294420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing the Role of Emotional Mediation in Explaining Crossmodal Correspondences Involving Musical Stimuli.
    Spence C
    Multisens Res; 2020 Jul; 33(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 31648195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cross-modal correspondence between auditory pitch and visual elevation modulates audiovisual temporal recalibration.
    Uno K; Yokosawa K
    Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):21308. PubMed ID: 36494490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cross-sensory correspondences and cross talk between dimensions of connotative meaning: visual angularity is hard, high-pitched, and bright.
    Walker P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Nov; 74(8):1792-809. PubMed ID: 22833281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A common scheme for cross-sensory correspondences across stimulus domains.
    Walker L; Walker P; Francis B
    Perception; 2012; 41(10):1186-92. PubMed ID: 23469700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Beyond colour perception: auditory-visual synaesthesia induces experiences of geometric objects in specific locations.
    Chiou R; Stelter M; Rich AN
    Cortex; 2013 Jun; 49(6):1750-63. PubMed ID: 22673231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual-auditory events: cross-modal perceptual priming and recognition memory.
    Greene AJ; Easton RD; LaShell LS
    Conscious Cogn; 2001 Sep; 10(3):425-35. PubMed ID: 11697874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pitch-elevation and pitch-size cross-modal correspondences do not affect temporal ventriloquism.
    Uno K; Yokosawa K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Apr; 84(3):1052-1063. PubMed ID: 35217979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cross-Modal Correspondence Among Vision, Audition, and Touch in Natural Objects: An Investigation of the Perceptual Properties of Wood.
    Kanaya S; Kariya K; Fujisaki W
    Perception; 2016 Oct; 45(10):1099-114. PubMed ID: 27257036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What, if anything, can be considered an amodal sensory dimension?
    Spence C; Di Stefano N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38381301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cross-Modal Correspondences in Non-human Mammal Communication.
    Ratcliffe VF; Taylor AM; Reby D
    Multisens Res; 2016; 29(1-3):49-91. PubMed ID: 27311291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How automatic are crossmodal correspondences?
    Spence C; Deroy O
    Conscious Cogn; 2013 Mar; 22(1):245-60. PubMed ID: 23370382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interactions Between Auditory Elevation, Auditory Pitch and Visual Elevation During Multisensory Perception.
    Jamal Y; Lacey S; Nygaard L; Sathian K
    Multisens Res; 2017 Jan; 30(3-5):287-306. PubMed ID: 31287081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.