133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37964435)
1. Accuracy of an Air-Puff Dynamic Tonometry Biomarker to Discriminate the Corneal Biomechanical Response in Patients With Keratoconus.
Lombardo G; Alunni-Fegatelli D; Serrao S; Mencucci R; Roszkowska AM; Bernava GM; Vestri A; Aleo D; Lombardo M
Cornea; 2024 Mar; 43(3):315-322. PubMed ID: 37964435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Application of a scheimpflug-based biomechanical analyser and tomography in the early detection of subclinical keratoconus in chinese patients.
Liu Y; Zhang Y; Chen Y
BMC Ophthalmol; 2021 Sep; 21(1):339. PubMed ID: 34544392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic Ability of Corneal Shape and Biomechanical Parameters for Detecting Frank Keratoconus.
Sedaghat MR; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Ambrósio R; Heidari HR; Maddah N; Danesh Z; Sabzi F
Cornea; 2018 Aug; 37(8):1025-1034. PubMed ID: 29847493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability analysis of successive Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology measurements in different keratoconus stages.
Flockerzi E; Häfner L; Xanthopoulou K; Daas L; Munteanu C; Langenbucher A; Seitz B
Acta Ophthalmol; 2022 Feb; 100(1):e83-e90. PubMed ID: 33750037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. CorNet: Autonomous feature learning in raw Corvis ST data for keratoconus diagnosis via residual CNN approach.
Zhang P; Yang L; Mao Y; Zhang X; Cheng J; Miao Y; Bao F; Chen S; Zheng Q; Wang J
Comput Biol Med; 2024 Apr; 172():108286. PubMed ID: 38493602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanics of the keratoconic cornea: Theory, segmentation, pressure distribution, and coupled FE-optimization algorithm.
Rahmati SM; Razaghi R; Karimi A
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Jan; 113():104155. PubMed ID: 33125958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of Keratoconus With a New Biomechanical Index.
Vinciguerra R; Ambrósio R; Elsheikh A; Roberts CJ; Lopes B; Morenghi E; Azzolini C; Vinciguerra P
J Refract Surg; 2016 Dec; 32(12):803-810. PubMed ID: 27930790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Determining in vivo elasticity and viscosity with dynamic Scheimpflug imaging analysis in keratoconic and healthy eyes.
Wang LK; Tian L; Zheng YP
J Biophotonics; 2016 May; 9(5):454-63. PubMed ID: 26755237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Corneal Dynamic and Tomographic Analysis in Normal, Forme Fruste Keratoconic, and Keratoconic Eyes.
Wang YM; Chan TCY; Yu M; Jhanji V
J Refract Surg; 2017 Sep; 33(9):632-638. PubMed ID: 28880339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation Between Corneal Biomechanical Indices and the Severity of Keratoconus.
Koh S; Inoue R; Ambrósio R; Maeda N; Miki A; Nishida K
Cornea; 2020 Feb; 39(2):215-221. PubMed ID: 31478950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of Corvis ST Parameters Including Updated Stress-Strain Index in Differentiating Between Normal, Forme-Fruste, Subclinical, and Clinical Keratoconic Eyes.
Miao YY; Ma XM; Qu ZX; Eliasy A; Wu BW; Xu H; Wang P; Zheng XB; Wang JJ; Ye YF; Chen SH; Elsheikh A; Bao FJ
Am J Ophthalmol; 2024 Feb; 258():196-207. PubMed ID: 37879454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optical Quality in Keratoconus Is Associated With Corneal Biomechanics.
Shugyo A; Koh S; Inoue R; Ambrósio R; Miki A; Maeda N; Nishida K
Cornea; 2021 Oct; 40(10):1276-1281. PubMed ID: 33332893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In-vivo high-speed biomechanical imaging of the cornea using Corvis ST and digital image correlation.
Wang B; Yang L; Cheng J; Wang J; Mei Y
Comput Biol Med; 2023 Feb; 153():106540. PubMed ID: 36646022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of corneal dynamic parameters and tomographic measurements using Scheimpflug imaging in keratoconus.
Chan TC; Wang YM; Yu M; Jhanji V
Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jan; 102(1):42-47. PubMed ID: 28559422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Keratoconus detection and classification from parameters of the Corvis®ST : A study based on algorithms of machine learning].
Langenbucher A; Häfner L; Eppig T; Seitz B; Szentmáry N; Flockerzi E
Ophthalmologe; 2021 Jul; 118(7):697-706. PubMed ID: 32970190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic corneal biomechanics in different cell layers: in keratoconus and normal eyes.
Alvani A; Hashemi H; Pakravan M; Mahbod M; Amanzadeh K; Seyedian MA; Yaseri M; Jafarzadehpur E; Fotouhi A
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2021 Mar; 41(2):414-423. PubMed ID: 33236803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanical Indices in Distinguishing Between Normal, Very Asymmetric, and Bilateral Keratoconic Eyes.
Herber R; Hasanli A; Lenk J; Vinciguerra R; Terai N; Pillunat LE; Raiskup F
J Refract Surg; 2022 Jun; 38(6):364-372. PubMed ID: 35686712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of Scheimpflug-derived corneal biomechanical and tomographic indices for detecting subclinical and mild keratectasia in a South Asian population.
Kataria P; Padmanabhan P; Gopalakrishnan A; Padmanaban V; Mahadik S; Ambrósio R
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Mar; 45(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 30527442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of ocular biomechanics using dynamic ultra high-speed Scheimpflug imaging in keratoconic and normal eyes.
Tian L; Ko MW; Wang LK; Zhang JY; Li TJ; Huang YF; Zheng YP
J Refract Surg; 2014 Nov; 30(11):785-91. PubMed ID: 25291757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of new Corvis ST parameters for detecting subclinical and clinical keratoconus eyes in a Chinese population.
Ren S; Xu L; Fan Q; Gu Y; Yang K
Sci Rep; 2021 Mar; 11(1):4962. PubMed ID: 33654120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
