These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3796482)

  • 21. Erratum: An examination of errors in characteristic curve measurements of radiographic screen/film systems [Med. Phys. 10, 365 (1983)].
    Wagner LK; Barnes GT; Bencomo JA; Haus AG
    Med Phys; 1983; 10(5):708. PubMed ID: 6646082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
    MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
    Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Optimal steel thickness combined with computed radiography for portal imaging of nasopharyngeal cancer patients.
    Wu S; Jin X; Xie C; Cao G
    Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3112-6. PubMed ID: 16279063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quantum noise in X-ray image intensifiers.
    Porubszky T
    J Biomed Eng; 1987 Jul; 9(3):261-6. PubMed ID: 3613550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Logistic representation of the sensitometric response of screen-film systems: empirical validation.
    Willis CE; Bencomo JA
    Med Phys; 1990; 17(4):676-80. PubMed ID: 2215413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Experimental evaluation of screen-film combinations for intraoral panoramic radiography.
    Molander B
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1986; 15(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 3470222
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Measurement of objective parameters of image quality of film-screen combinations].
    Angerstein W; Wolf M
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1986; 27(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 3961142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Selecting the best screen-film combination.
    Stears JG; Gray JE; Frank ED
    Radiol Technol; 1987; 58(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 3823415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessment of radiographic screen-film systems: a comparison between the use of a microdensitometer and a drum film digitiser.
    Verdun FR; Pachoud M; Bergmann D; Buhr E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):208-13. PubMed ID: 15933110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The relationship between resolution and speed of x-ray intensifying screens.
    Rao GU; Fatouros P
    Med Phys; 1978; 5(3):205-8. PubMed ID: 672813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Image contrast in various cassette-screen-film combinations].
    Barth HH; Grasser H
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1985 Dec; 40(12):1230-4. PubMed ID: 3869536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison of the accuracy of cephalometric landmark location between two screen/film combinations.
    Stirrups DR
    Angle Orthod; 1989; 59(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 2774297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An examination of errors in characteristic curve measurements of radiographic screen/film systems.
    Wagner LK; Barnes GT; Bencomo JA; Haus AG
    Med Phys; 1983; 10(3):365-9. PubMed ID: 6877185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Modification of an automatic exposure control system for mammography to accommodate multiple-speed, screen-film systems.
    Rossi RP; Williams C; Gill D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Oct; 151(4):685-6. PubMed ID: 3262269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Optimization of the thoracic radiograph. Experimental and clinical study on the use of various film/screen combinations using rare earths].
    Bergonzini R; Gallini R; Giugni U; Robecchi D; Amato M
    Radiol Med; 1986 May; 72(5):261-6. PubMed ID: 3715076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of radiation exposures between conventional and rare-earth screen/film systems.
    Chu WK; Sangster W; Dobry CA
    Health Phys; 1985 Nov; 49(5):958-61. PubMed ID: 4066354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [High intensification film-screen systems in thoracic diagnosis. A clinical comparative study].
    Schäfer CB; Sokiranski R; Claussen CD
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Nov; 5(6):389-93. PubMed ID: 8580141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [A study of digital x-ray detection systems with optical image transfer].
    Kanter BM; Vladimirov LV; Lygin VA; Medvedeva NA; Chuliukov GI
    Med Tekh; 2006; (5):42-5. PubMed ID: 17133947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Light production from intensifying screens (theoretical and experimental aspects)].
    Giacomich R; Tomasini F; Bacarini L; Di Lelio A
    Radiol Med; 1982; 68(7-8):571-80. PubMed ID: 7134508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dose efficiency of screen-film systems used in pediatric radiography.
    Cohen G; Wagner LK; McDaniel DL; Robinson LH
    Radiology; 1984 Jul; 152(1):187-93. PubMed ID: 6729110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.