These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37965285)

  • 1. Why 2D layout in 3D images matters: evidence from visual search and eyetracking.
    Krauze L; Delesa-Velina M; Pladere T; Krumina G
    J Eye Mov Res; 2023; 16(1):. PubMed ID: 37965285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual search is influenced by 3D spatial layout.
    Finlayson NJ; Grove PM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2322-30. PubMed ID: 25971812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Misperceptions in Stereoscopic Displays: A Vision Science Perspective.
    Held RT; Banks MS
    ACM Trans Graph; 2008 Jan; 2008():23-32. PubMed ID: 24683290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contextual Cueing Effect in Spatial Layout Defined by Binocular Disparity.
    Zhao G; Zhuang Q; Ma J; Tu S; Liu Q; Sun HJ
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1472. PubMed ID: 28912739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Allocation of attention in 3D space is adaptively modulated by relative position of target and distractor stimuli.
    Plewan T; Rinkenauer G
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jun; 82(3):1063-1073. PubMed ID: 31773511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of simulated three-dimensional perception on precision of depth judgements, technical performance and perceived workload in laparoscopy.
    Sakata S; Grove PM; Hill A; Watson MO; Stevenson ARL
    Br J Surg; 2017 Jul; 104(8):1097-1106. PubMed ID: 28425560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. EEG based evaluation of stereoscopic 3D displays for viewer discomfort.
    Malik AS; Khairuddin RN; Amin HU; Smith ML; Kamel N; Abdullah JM; Fawzy SM; Shim S
    Biomed Eng Online; 2015 Mar; 14():21. PubMed ID: 25886584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Illuminating Smiles and Frowns: Visual-Affective Cueing Influences Viewer Perceptions of Page Layout Images.
    Grygarová D; Adámek P; Lukavský J; Kesner L
    Percept Mot Skills; 2020 Feb; 127(1):75-97. PubMed ID: 31547784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interpretation of three-dimensional structure from two-dimensional endovascular images: implications for educators in vascular surgery.
    Sidhu RS; Tompa D; Jang R; Grober ED; Johnston KW; Reznick RK; Hamstra SJ
    J Vasc Surg; 2004 Jun; 39(6):1305-11. PubMed ID: 15192573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-dimensional display-induced transient myopia and the difference in myopic shift between crossed and uncrossed disparities.
    Suh YW; Oh J; Kim HM; Cho YA; Song JS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Jul; 53(8):5029-32. PubMed ID: 22761261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stereoscopic viewing and reported perceived immersion and symptoms.
    Yang SN; Schlieski T; Selmins B; Cooper SC; Doherty RA; Corriveau PJ; Sheedy JE
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Jul; 89(7):1068-80. PubMed ID: 22733100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of task difficulty on visual search strategy in virtual 3D displays.
    Pomplun M; Garaas TW; Carrasco M
    J Vis; 2013 Aug; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23986539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On Visually-Grounded Reference Production: Testing the Effects of Perceptual Grouping and 2D/3D Presentation Mode.
    Koolen R
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2247. PubMed ID: 31632326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changes in ocular parameters depending on the motion-in-depth of a three-dimensional display.
    Yum HR; Park SH; Kang HB; Shin SY
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2015 Dec; 99(12):1706-12. PubMed ID: 26024674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accommodation-Free Head Mounted Display with Comfortable 3D Perception and an Enlarged Eye-box.
    Shrestha PK; Pryn MJ; Jia J; Chen JS; Fructuoso HN; Boev A; Zhang Q; Chu D
    Research (Wash D C); 2019; 2019():9273723. PubMed ID: 32043082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 3D Space Layout Design of Holographic Command Cabin Information Display in Mixed Reality Environment Based on HoloLens 2.
    Wang W; Hong X; Dang S; Xu N; Qu J
    Brain Sci; 2022 Jul; 12(8):. PubMed ID: 35892412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Towards a framework for analysis of eye-tracking studies in the three dimensional environment: a study of visual search by experienced readers of endoluminal CT colonography.
    Helbren E; Halligan S; Phillips P; Boone D; Fanshawe TR; Taylor SA; Manning D; Gale A; Altman DG; Mallett S
    Br J Radiol; 2014 May; 87(1037):20130614. PubMed ID: 24689842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 3D Layout Estimation via Weakly Supervised Learning of Plane Parameters From 2D Segmentation.
    Zhang W; Zhang Y; Song R; Liu Y; Zhang W
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():868-879. PubMed ID: 34910632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 3D visual discomfort predictor: analysis of horizontal disparity and neural activity statistics.
    Park J; Oh H; Lee S; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2015 Mar; 24(3):1101-14. PubMed ID: 25532185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gaze-driven placement of items for proactive visual exploration.
    Takahashi S; Uchita A; Watanabe K; Arikawa M
    J Vis (Tokyo); 2022; 25(3):613-633. PubMed ID: 34785979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.