203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37965455)
21. Short-term and long-term efficacy in robot-assisted treatment for mid and low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wu H; Guo R; Li H
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Dec; 39(1):7. PubMed ID: 38127156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Prete FP; Pezzolla A; Prete F; Testini M; Marzaioli R; Patriti A; Jimenez-Rodriguez RM; Gurrado A; Strippoli GFM
Ann Surg; 2018 Jun; 267(6):1034-1046. PubMed ID: 28984644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic and periampullary tumor: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and non-randomized comparative studies.
Yan Y; Hua Y; Chang C; Zhu X; Sha Y; Wang B
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():1093395. PubMed ID: 36761416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lee SH; Kim DH; Lim SW
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Dec; 33(12):1741-1753. PubMed ID: 30187156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Laparoscopic vs. open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Yan Y; Ou C; Cao S; Hua Y; Sha Y
Front Surg; 2023; 10():1127854. PubMed ID: 36874456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effects of laparoscopic vs robotic-assisted mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: An update systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Huang YJ; Kang YN; Huang YM; Wu AT; Wang W; Wei PL
Asian J Surg; 2019 Jun; 42(6):657-666. PubMed ID: 30609955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ma J; Li X; Zhao S; Zhang R; Yang D
World J Surg Oncol; 2020 Nov; 18(1):306. PubMed ID: 33234134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials comparing gynecologic laparoscopic procedures with and without robotic assistance.
Marchand G; Taher Masoud A; Ware K; Govindan M; King A; Ruther S; Brazil G; Calteux N; Coriell C; Ulibarri H; Parise J; Arroyo A; Filippelli C; Loli H; Sainz K
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Oct; 265():30-38. PubMed ID: 34418694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Robotic-Assisted vs. Standard Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 19,731 Patients.
Safiejko K; Tarkowski R; Koselak M; Juchimiuk M; Tarasik A; Pruc M; Smereka J; Szarpak L
Cancers (Basel); 2021 Dec; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 35008344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Angiography on Anastomotic Leakage in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Propensity-Score-Matched Studies.
Tang G; Du D; Tao J; Wei Z
Front Surg; 2022; 9():815753. PubMed ID: 35372484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Gastric Cancer Surgery: Short-Term Outcomes-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 25,521 Patients.
Loureiro P; Barbosa JP; Vale JF; Barbosa J
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2023 Aug; 33(8):782-800. PubMed ID: 37204324
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Rectal Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of 7 Randomized Controlled Trials.
Li L; Zhang W; Guo Y; Wang X; Yu H; Du B; Yang X; Luo Y
Surg Innov; 2019 Aug; 26(4):497-504. PubMed ID: 31081483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of survival and post-operation outcomes for minimally invasive versus open hepatectomy in hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of case-matched studies.
Fu B; Zhang JR; Han PS; Zhang YM
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():1021804. PubMed ID: 36338679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of perioperative and short-term outcomes between robotic and conventional laparoscopic surgery for colonic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lim S; Kim JH; Baek SJ; Kim SH; Lee SH
Ann Surg Treat Res; 2016 Jun; 90(6):328-39. PubMed ID: 27274509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wang X; Cao G; Mao W; Lao W; He C
J Cancer Res Ther; 2020 Sep; 16(5):979-989. PubMed ID: 33004738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes between laparoscope-assisted transanal total mesorectal excision and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for the treatment of mid and low rectal cancer: a meta-analysis].
Zhang X; Gao Y; Dai X; Zhang H; Cheng X; Li Q; Cai X; Shen T; Sun X; Li Y
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Aug; 21(8):924-935. PubMed ID: 30136274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Robot-assisted and conventional freehand pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Gao S; Lv Z; Fang H
Eur Spine J; 2018 Apr; 27(4):921-930. PubMed ID: 29032475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Safety and Oncological Outcomes of Laparoscopic NOSE Surgery Compared With Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Diseases: A Meta-Analysis.
Liu RJ; Zhang CD; Fan YC; Pei JP; Zhang C; Dai DQ
Front Oncol; 2019; 9():597. PubMed ID: 31334119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Is robotic distal pancreatectomy better than laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy after the learning curve? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chen C; Hu J; Yang H; Zhuo X; Ren Q; Feng Q; Wang M
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():954227. PubMed ID: 36106111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
