These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37965676)

  • 1. In Vitro Evaluation of Smear Layer and Debris Removal and Antimicrobial Activity of Different Irrigating Solutions.
    Castagnola R; Martini C; Colangeli M; Pellicciotta I; Marigo L; Grande NM; Bugli F; Plotino G
    Eur Endod J; 2024 Jan; 9(1):81-88. PubMed ID: 37965676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of Continuous Chelation Irrigation Using DualRinse HEDP+3% NaOCl with or without High-power Sonic Activation on Debris and Smear Layer Removal.
    Aoun C; Rechenberg DK; Karam M; Mhanna R; Plotino G; Zogheib C
    Eur Endod J; 2023 Mar; 8(2):162-169. PubMed ID: 37010200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals.
    Caron G; Nham K; Bronnec F; Machtou P
    J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1361-6. PubMed ID: 20647097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cleanliness and erosion of root canal walls after irrigation with a new HEDP-based solution vs. traditional sodium hypochlorite followed by EDTA. A scanning electron microscope study.
    Kfir A; Goldenberg C; Metzger Z; Hülsmann M; Baxter S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Oct; 24(10):3699-3706. PubMed ID: 32418013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the antibacterial effect and smear layer removal using photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming aided irrigation versus a conventional irrigation in single-rooted canals: an in vitro study.
    Zhu X; Yin X; Chang JW; Wang Y; Cheung GS; Zhang C
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2013 Aug; 31(8):371-7. PubMed ID: 23863104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Smear layer removal efficacy of different irrigating solutions: a comparative scanning electron microscope evaluation.
    Ahir B; Parekh V; Katyayan MK; Katyayan PA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(5):617-22. PubMed ID: 25511062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of continuous vs sequential chelation on the mechanical properties of root dentin: An ex vivo study.
    Ballal NV; Ray AB; Narkedamalli R; Urala AS; Patel V; Harris M; Bergeron BE; Tay FR
    J Dent; 2024 Sep; 148():105214. PubMed ID: 38950767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer and Debris on the Canal Walls prepared with a Combination of Hand and Rotary ProTaper Technique using Scanning Electron Microscope.
    Kiran S; Prakash S; Siddharth PR; Saha S; Geojan NE; Ramachandran M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul; 17(7):574-81. PubMed ID: 27595725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of heat in the properties of NaOCl alone and mixed with etidronate and alkaline tetrasodium EDTA.
    Tartari T; Borges MMB; de Araújo LBB; Vivan RR; Bonjardim LR; Duarte MAH
    Int Endod J; 2021 Apr; 54(4):616-627. PubMed ID: 33219520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of different irrigation protocols on smear layer removal in root canals of primary teeth: a SEM study.
    Demirel A; Yüksel BN; Ziya M; Gümüş H; Doğan S; Sari Ş
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2019 Jul; 77(5):380-385. PubMed ID: 30859897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis.
    Teixeira CS; Felippe MC; Felippe WT
    Int Endod J; 2005 May; 38(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 15876291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Root canal debridement efficacy of different final irrigation protocols.
    Al-Ali M; Sathorn C; Parashos P
    Int Endod J; 2012 Oct; 45(10):898-906. PubMed ID: 22486845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of root canal wall cleanliness after calcium hydroxide removal using three irrigation regimens.
    Naaman A; Kaloustian H; Ounsi HF; Naaman-Bou Abboud N; Ricci C; Medioni E
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jan; 8(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 17211500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparative scanning electron microscopic investigation of the smear layer after the use of sodium hypochlorite gel and solution forms as root canal irrigants.
    Zand V; Lotfi M; Rahimi S; Mokhtari H; Kazemi A; Sakhamanesh V
    J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1234-7. PubMed ID: 20630306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the efficacy of maleic acid and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in smear layer removal from instrumented human root canal: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Ballal NV; Kandian S; Mala K; Bhat KS; Acharya S
    J Endod; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1573-6. PubMed ID: 19840650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy of four different irrigation techniques combined with 60 °C 3% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA in smear layer removal.
    Guo X; Miao H; Li L; Zhang S; Zhou D; Lu Y; Wu L
    BMC Oral Health; 2014 Sep; 14():114. PubMed ID: 25201549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and MTAD on debris and smear layer removal using a self-adjusting file.
    Adigüzel O; Yiğit-Özer S; Kaya S; Uysal İ; Ganidağli-Ayaz S; Akkuş Z
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):803-8. PubMed ID: 21873086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effectiveness of the EndoActivator System in removing the smear layer after root canal instrumentation.
    Uroz-Torres D; González-Rodríguez MP; Ferrer-Luque CM
    J Endod; 2010 Feb; 36(2):308-11. PubMed ID: 20113797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative scanning electron microscopy evaluation of smear layer removal with apple vinegar and sodium hypochlorite associated with EDTA.
    Candeiro GT; Matos IB; Costa CF; Fonteles CS; Vale MS
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2011; 19(6):639-43. PubMed ID: 22231000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Light and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of Glyde File Prep in smear layer removal.
    Lim TS; Wee TY; Choi MY; Koh WC; Sae-Lim V
    Int Endod J; 2003 May; 36(5):336-43. PubMed ID: 12752647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.