These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37965745)

  • 1. Use of the universal scan template to achieve a predictable optical impression: Preliminary data of a case series study in complete edentulous patients.
    Campana V; Papa A; Silvetti MA; Del Fabbro M; Testori T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2024 Feb; 26(1):237-244. PubMed ID: 37965745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital vs Conventional Full-Arch Implant Impressions: A Retrospective Analysis of 36 Edentulous Jaws.
    Papaspyridakos P; De Souza A; Finkelman M; Sicilia E; Gotsis S; Chen YW; Vazouras K; Chochlidakis K
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Apr; 32(4):325-330. PubMed ID: 35524647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro scanning accuracy using different aids for multiple implants in the edentulous arch.
    Kernen FR; Recca M; Vach K; Nahles S; Nelson K; Flügge TV
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Oct; 33(10):1010-1020. PubMed ID: 35861128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhancing intraoral scanner accuracy using scan aid for multiple implants in the edentulous arch: An in vivo study.
    Kernen F; Brändle D; Wagendorf O; Recca M; Mehrhof J; Vach K; Nahles S; Nelson K; Flügge T
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Aug; 34(8):793-801. PubMed ID: 37314046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of different artificial landmarks and scanning patterns on the complete-arch implant intraoral digital scans.
    Kanjanasavitree P; Thammajaruk P; Guazzato M
    J Dent; 2022 Oct; 125():104266. PubMed ID: 35995084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing the accuracy of full-arch implant impressions using the conventional technique and digital scans with and without prefabricated landmarks in the mandible: An in vitro study.
    Ke Y; Zhang Y; Wang Y; Chen H; Sun Y
    J Dent; 2023 Aug; 135():104561. PubMed ID: 37236297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of photogrammetry, intraoral scanning, and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: an in vitro comparative study.
    Ma B; Yue X; Sun Y; Peng L; Geng W
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Dec; 21(1):636. PubMed ID: 34893053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of intraoral scanning coverage on the accuracy of digital implant impressions - An in vitro study.
    Wang ZY; Gong Y; Liu F; Chen D; Zheng JW; Shen JF
    J Dent; 2024 Apr; 143():104929. PubMed ID: 38458380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional differences between intraoral scans and conventional impressions of edentulous jaws: A clinical study.
    Lo Russo L; Caradonna G; Troiano G; Salamini A; Guida L; Ciavarella D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):264-268. PubMed ID: 31153614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of impression-making methods in edentulous arches: An in vitro study encompassing conventional and digital methods.
    Li J; Moon HS; Kim JH; Yoon HI; Oh KC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):479-486. PubMed ID: 33583617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 3D Accuracy of a Conventional Method Versus Three Digital Scanning Strategies for Completely Edentulous Maxillary Implant Impressions.
    Blanco-Plard A; Hernandez A; Pino F; Vargas N; Rivas-Tumanyan S; Elias A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023 Dec; 38(6):1211-1219. PubMed ID: 38085753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vivo trueness and precision of full-arch implant scans using intraoral scanners with three different acquisition protocols.
    Nedelcu R; Olsson P; Thulin M; Nyström I; Thor A
    J Dent; 2023 Jan; 128():104308. PubMed ID: 36481688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of scanbody design and intraoral scanner on the trueness of complete arch implant digital impressions: An in vitro study.
    Meneghetti PC; Li J; Borella PS; Mendonça G; Burnett LH
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(12):e0295790. PubMed ID: 38113200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital assessment of the accuracy of implant impression techniques in free end saddle partially edentulous patients. A controlled clinical trial.
    Dohiem MM; Abdelaziz MS; Abdalla MF; Fawzy AM
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Nov; 22(1):486. PubMed ID: 36371189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of digital and silicone impressions for single-tooth implants and two- and three-unit implants for a free-end edentulous saddle.
    Nagata K; Fuchigami K; Okuhama Y; Wakamori K; Tsuruoka H; Nakashizu T; Hoshi N; Atsumi M; Kimoto K; Kawana H
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Sep; 21(1):464. PubMed ID: 34556111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of impressions for multiple implants: A comparative study of digital and conventional techniques.
    Lyu M; Di P; Lin Y; Jiang X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1017-1023. PubMed ID: 33640093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital Workflow to Merge an Intraoral Scan and CBCT of Edentulous Maxilla: A Technical Report.
    Carosi P; Ferrigno N; De Renzi G; Laureti M
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Oct; 29(8):730-732. PubMed ID: 32608078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Implant Impressions: Effect of Interimplant Distance in an Edentulous Arch.
    Tan MY; Yee SHX; Wong KM; Tan YH; Tan KBC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(2):366–380. PubMed ID: 30521661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the accuracy of intraoral scanners for complete-arch scanning: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Vitai V; Németh A; Sólyom E; Czumbel LM; Szabó B; Fazekas R; Gerber G; Hegyi P; Hermann P; Borbély J
    J Dent; 2023 Oct; 137():104636. PubMed ID: 37516338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro and in vivo accuracy of full-arch digital implant impressions.
    Rutkunas V; Gedrimiene A; Akulauskas M; Fehmer V; Sailer I; Jegelevicius D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Dec; 32(12):1444-1454. PubMed ID: 34543478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.