These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37967045)

  • 1. Forensic analysis of the Turkey 2023 presidential election reveals extreme vote swings in remote areas.
    Klimek P; Aykaç A; Thurner S
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0293239. PubMed ID: 37967045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forensic analysis of Turkish elections in 2017-2018.
    Klimek P; Jiménez R; Hidalgo M; Hinteregger A; Thurner S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0204975. PubMed ID: 30289899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Testing for voter rigging in small polling stations.
    Jimenez R; Hidalgo M; Klimek P
    Sci Adv; 2017 Jun; 3(6):e1602363. PubMed ID: 28695193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Forensic analysis of Venezuelan elections during the Chávez presidency.
    Jiménez R; Hidalgo M
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e100884. PubMed ID: 24971462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The forensics of fraud: Evidence from the 2018 Brazilian presidential election.
    Figueiredo Filho D; Silva L; Carvalho E
    Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2022; 5():100286. PubMed ID: 36176631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Statistical detection of systematic election irregularities.
    Klimek P; Yegorov Y; Hanel R; Thurner S
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Oct; 109(41):16469-73. PubMed ID: 23010929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Baseline comparative analysis and review of election forensics: Application to Ghana's 2012 and 2020 presidential elections.
    Agyemang EF; Nortey ENN; Minkah R; Asah-Asante K
    Heliyon; 2023 Aug; 9(8):e18276. PubMed ID: 37576298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Field experiment estimate of electoral fraud in Russian parliamentary elections.
    Enikolopov R; Korovkin V; Petrova M; Sonin K; Zakharov A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Jan; 110(2):448-52. PubMed ID: 23267093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Election forensics: Using machine learning and synthetic data for possible election anomaly detection.
    Zhang M; Alvarez RM; Levin I
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223950. PubMed ID: 31671106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Suspicious Minds: Unexpected Election Outcomes, Perceived Electoral Integrity and Satisfaction With Democracy in American Presidential Elections.
    Mongrain P
    Polit Res Q; 2023 Dec; 76(4):1589-1603. PubMed ID: 37916035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Emergency Absentee Voting for Hospitalized Patients and Voting During COVID-19: A 50-State Study.
    Tang OY; Wong KE; Ganguli R; Zahiri K; Burns NM; Paracha S; Kozel G; Tang KP; Schuur JD
    West J Emerg Med; 2021 Jul; 22(4):1000-1009. PubMed ID: 35354012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Public interest in Cannabis during election season: a Google Trends analysis.
    Torgerson T; Roberts W; Lester D; Khojasteh J; Vassar M
    J Cannabis Res; 2020 Sep; 2(1):31. PubMed ID: 33526135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gains in health insurance coverage explain variation in Democratic vote share in the 2008-2016 presidential elections.
    Hollingsworth A; Soni A; Carroll AE; Cawley J; Simon K
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0214206. PubMed ID: 30946752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Online engagement with 2020 election misinformation and turnout in the 2021 Georgia runoff election.
    Green J; Hobbs W; McCabe S; Lazer D
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Aug; 119(34):e2115900119. PubMed ID: 35972960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The costs of electoral fraud: establishing the link between electoral integrity, winning an election, and satisfaction with democracy.
    Fortin-Rittberger J; Harfst P; Dingler SC
    J Elect Public Opin Parties; 2017 Jul; 27(3):350-368. PubMed ID: 28824703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Presidential, But Not Prime Minister, Candidates With Lower Pitched Voices Stand a Better Chance of Winning the Election in Conservative Countries.
    Banai B; Laustsen L; Banai IP; Bovan K
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(2):1474704918758736. PubMed ID: 29911405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Not by turnout alone: Measuring the sources of electoral change, 2012 to 2016.
    Hill SJ; Hopkins DJ; Huber GA
    Sci Adv; 2021 Apr; 7(17):. PubMed ID: 33883131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
    Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electoral College bias and the 2020 presidential election.
    Erikson RS; Sigman K; Yao L
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Nov; 117(45):27940-27944. PubMed ID: 33106408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ensuring Equitable Access to Participation in the Electoral Process: A Policy Brief From the American College of Physicians.
    Cline K; Hilden D; Beachy M;
    Ann Intern Med; 2024 Jan; 177(1):68-69. PubMed ID: 38145572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.