These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3796722)

  • 1. Embryo research: UK legislation further delayed.
    Newmark P
    Nature; 1986 Dec 18-31; 324(6098):604. PubMed ID: 3796722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recommendations of the Warnock Committee.
    Lancet; 1984 Jul; 2(8396):217-8. PubMed ID: 6146766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cloning technique 'reveals legal loophole'.
    Masood E
    Nature; 1997 Feb; 385(6619):757. PubMed ID: 9039895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. House of Commons votes for ban on embryo research.
    Med World News; 1985 Apr; 26(7):30. PubMed ID: 11649605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. British government hedges bets on embryo research.
    Hadlington S
    Nature; 1987 Dec 3-9; 330(6147):409. PubMed ID: 3683559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A welcome report.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Jul; 289(6439):207-8. PubMed ID: 6430410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Human reproduction: regulated progress or damned interference?
    Lancet; 1984 Jul; 2(8396):202-4. PubMed ID: 6146756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Report of the Warnock Committee on Human Fertilisation and Embryology.
    Priest JA
    Mod Law Rev; 1985 Jan; 48(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 16100813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Why Warnock's 14-day rule may be unworkable.
    Connor S
    New Sci; 1985 Jan; 105(1438):6. PubMed ID: 11658553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Embryo research.
    Lancet; 1985 Feb; 1(8423):255-6. PubMed ID: 2857322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. UK ethicists back use of stem cells.
    Dickson D
    Nature; 2000 Apr; 404(6779):697. PubMed ID: 10809627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lords oppose embryo research.
    New Sci; 1984 Nov; 104(1429):6. PubMed ID: 11655672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Government seeks views on 'test-tube' babies.
    Vines G
    New Sci; 1986 Dec; 112(1539):3. PubMed ID: 11658779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 -- a British case history for legislation on bioethical issues.
    Bolton V; Osborn J; Servante D
    J Int Bioethique; 1992 Jun; 3(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 11651386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assisted fertilization: legal restraints proposed for UK.
    Nature; 1984 Jul 26-Aug 1; 310(5975):266. PubMed ID: 6462211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Embryo research and abortion.
    Nature; 1989 Oct; 341(6244):673. PubMed ID: 2627213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Moral thinking and government policy: the Warnock Committee on Human Embryology.
    Warnock M
    Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1985; 63(3):504-22. PubMed ID: 3852077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Scientific research must have a moral basis.
    Warnock M
    New Sci; 1984 Nov; 104(1430):36. PubMed ID: 11658551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Legal responses to some of the new developments in reproductive technologies. Part 1.
    Scott A
    Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 2001; 7(2):28-37. PubMed ID: 11881688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The start of a long debate on the Warnock report.
    Deitch R
    Lancet; 1984 Jul; 2(8396):238. PubMed ID: 11644288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.