These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3796725)

  • 1. Nuclear safety: United States opts for caution.
    Beardsley T
    Nature; 1986 Dec 18-31; 324(6098):607. PubMed ID: 3796725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Soviet worries about nuclear safety after Chernobyl.
    Rich V
    Nature; 1988 Aug; 334(6181):373. PubMed ID: 3405282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nuclear risk assessment.
    Tiedemann H
    Nature; 1986 Dec 4-10; 324(6096):404. PubMed ID: 3785414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Chernobyl accident is blamed on human error.
    Rich V
    Nature; 1986 Jul 24-30; 322(6077):295. PubMed ID: 3736656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Whatever happened to reactor safety?
    Kerr W
    Bull N Y Acad Med; 1983 Dec; 59(10):907-11. PubMed ID: 6582978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Developing countries plan to displace Blix at IAEA.
    Dickman S
    Nature; 1988 May; 333(6171):288. PubMed ID: 3374560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Yugoslavia: doubts on nuclear safety.
    Rich V
    Occup Health (Lond); 1981 Aug; 33(8):427-9. PubMed ID: 6912963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safety of nuclear plants in the United States.
    Kouts H
    Radiat Res; 1988 Feb; 113(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 3340727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Chernobyl report. Coping with the human factor.
    Wilson R
    Nature; 1986 Sep 4-10; 323(6083):25-30. PubMed ID: 3748177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Half-way report from Chernobyl.
    Nature; 1986 Jul 24-30; 322(6077):293. PubMed ID: 3736655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Government nuclear accident planning--do doctors have confidence in it?
    Morrison L
    Med War; 1989; 5(4):173-4. PubMed ID: 2622416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nuclear safety: NRC investigates Seabrook.
    Collins E
    Nature; 1986 Nov 20-26; 324(6094):203. PubMed ID: 3785390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Safety of DOE reactors questioned.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1987 Nov; 238(4828):741. PubMed ID: 3672120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Second chance for nuclear power?
    Nature; 1986 Sep 4-10; 323(6083):1-2. PubMed ID: 3748171
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nuclear power after Chernobyl.
    Ahearne JF
    Science; 1987 May; 236(4802):673-9. PubMed ID: 3576192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Chernobyl nuclear reactor accident pertinent radiation information: 1986.
    Conn Med; 1986 Aug; 50(8):535-40. PubMed ID: 3757506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Chernobyl nuclear accident.
    Sanchez AF
    N Engl J Med; 1990 Feb; 322(6):401-2. PubMed ID: 2300093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How many reactor accidents will there be?
    Islam S; Lindgren K
    Nature; 1986 Aug 21-27; 322(6081):691-2. PubMed ID: 3748152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nuclear power plants. Nightmares or neighbors?
    Stanford TM
    Emergency; 1987 Mar; 19(3):37-41, 54. PubMed ID: 10280798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nuclear reactor safety: a new dilemma for the AEC.
    Gillette R
    Science; 1971 Jul; 173(3992):126-30. PubMed ID: 5581905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.