These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37967476)

  • 21. Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():37-45. PubMed ID: 29223864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Probing the unimaginable: The impact of aphantasia on distinct domains of visual mental imagery and visual perception.
    Liu J; Bartolomeo P
    Cortex; 2023 Sep; 166():338-347. PubMed ID: 37481856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Contingent capture in cueing: the role of color search templates and cue-target color relations.
    Ansorge U; Becker SI
    Psychol Res; 2014 Mar; 78(2):209-21. PubMed ID: 23807453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Capturing attention is not that simple: different mechanisms for stimulus-driven and contingent capture.
    Liao HI; Yeh SL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Nov; 75(8):1703-14. PubMed ID: 24037596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Quantifying aphantasia through drawing: Those without visual imagery show deficits in object but not spatial memory.
    Bainbridge WA; Pounder Z; Eardley AF; Baker CI
    Cortex; 2021 Feb; 135():159-172. PubMed ID: 33383478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Attentional repulsion effects produced by feature-guided shifts of attention.
    Baumeler D; Nako R; Born S; Eimer M
    J Vis; 2020 Mar; 20(3):10. PubMed ID: 32232375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Causal involvement of visual area MT in global feature-based enhancement but not contingent attentional capture.
    Painter DR; Dux PE; Mattingley JB
    Neuroimage; 2015 Sep; 118():90-102. PubMed ID: 26067347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Visual imagery influences attentional guidance during visual search: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Cochrane BA; Townsend B; Lee RC; Legere JK; Milliken B; Shedden JM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 33258086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Brain and Cognitive Mechanisms of Top-Down Attentional Control in a Multisensory World: Benefits of Electrical Neuroimaging.
    Matusz PJ; Turoman N; Tivadar RI; Retsa C; Murray MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Mar; 31(3):412-430. PubMed ID: 30513045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Top-down matching singleton cues have no edge over top-down matching nonsingletons in spatial cueing.
    Schoeberl T; Goller F; Ansorge U
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Feb; 26(1):241-249. PubMed ID: 29959614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Attentional set modulates visual areas: an event-related potential study of attentional capture.
    Arnott SR; Pratt J; Shore DI; Alain C
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2001 Dec; 12(3):383-95. PubMed ID: 11689298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A finer-grained search reveals no evidence of the attentional capture by to-be-ignored features.
    Rheem H; Cho YS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Aug; 83(6):2441-2457. PubMed ID: 33913088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Do We Prepare for What We Predict? How Target Expectations Affect Preparatory Attentional Templates and Target Selection in Visual Search.
    Grubert A; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2023 Dec; 35(12):1919-1935. PubMed ID: 37713670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Involuntary attentional capture by task-irrelevant objects that match the search template for category detection in natural scenes.
    Reeder RR; van Zoest W; Peelen MV
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 May; 77(4):1070-80. PubMed ID: 25810159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Multiple attentional control settings at distinct locations without the confounding of repetition priming.
    Cho SA; Cho YS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1718-1730. PubMed ID: 29959663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Exogenous attention can be counter-selective: onset cues disrupt sensitivity to color changes.
    Müller-Plath G; Klöckner N
    Psychol Res; 2014 Mar; 78(2):222-47. PubMed ID: 23519383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Feature-based attentional control for distractor suppression.
    Kim S; Cho YS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 May; 86(4):1075-1085. PubMed ID: 38418806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Interaction between stimulus-driven orienting and top-down modulation in attentional capture.
    Liao HI; Yeh SL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 21645875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Contingent attentional capture by top-down control settings: converging evidence from event-related potentials.
    Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Goodin Z; Remington RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Jun; 34(3):509-30. PubMed ID: 18505320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Multivariate analysis of EEG activity indexes contingent attentional capture.
    Munneke J; Fahrenfort JJ; Sutterer D; Theeuwes J; Awh E
    Neuroimage; 2021 Feb; 226():117562. PubMed ID: 33189931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.