These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37969007)

  • 1. Metabolic and Sensory Components of Age-Related Hearing Loss: Associations With Distortion- and Reflection-Based Otoacoustic Emissions.
    Vaden KI; Neely ST; Harris SE; Dubno JR
    Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165231213776. PubMed ID: 37969007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions Reflect Audiometric Patterns of Age-Related Hearing Loss.
    Vaden KI; Matthews LJ; Dubno JR
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518797848. PubMed ID: 30198420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Observations of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission Components in Adults With Hearing Loss.
    Prieve BA; Thomas L; Long G; Talmadge C
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(3):652-662. PubMed ID: 31569117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Towards a joint reflection-distortion otoacoustic emission profile: Results in normal and impaired ears.
    Abdala C; Kalluri R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):812. PubMed ID: 28863614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and cochlear microphonics: relationships in patients with and without endolymphatic hydrops.
    Fetterman BL
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Jun; 111(6):946-54. PubMed ID: 11404602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of aging on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in adults with normal hearing.
    Uchida Y; Ando F; Shimokata H; Sugiura S; Ueda H; Nakashima T
    Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):176-84. PubMed ID: 18595184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Weakened Cochlear Nonlinearity During Human Aging and Perceptual Correlates.
    Abdala C; Ortmann AJ; Guardia YC
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(4):832-845. PubMed ID: 33886169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reflection- and Distortion-Source Otoacoustic Emissions: Evidence for Increased Irregularity in the Human Cochlea During Aging.
    Abdala C; Ortmann AJ; Shera CA
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2018 Oct; 19(5):493-510. PubMed ID: 29968098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High-frequency hearing influences lower-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Arnold DJ; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1999 Feb; 125(2):215-22. PubMed ID: 10037289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changes in the Compressive Nonlinearity of the Cochlea During Early Aging: Estimates From Distortion OAE Input/Output Functions.
    Ortmann AJ; Abdala C
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):603-14. PubMed ID: 27232070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
    Hoth S
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An objective method of analyzing cochlear versus noncochlear patterns of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in patients with acoustic neuromas.
    Telischi F
    Laryngoscope; 2000 Apr; 110(4):553-62. PubMed ID: 10763999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characterizing the Relationship Between Reflection and Distortion Otoacoustic Emissions in Normal-Hearing Adults.
    Abdala C; Luo P; Shera CA
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Oct; 23(5):647-664. PubMed ID: 35804277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cochlear Mechanisms and Otoacoustic Emission Test Performance.
    Go NA; Stamper GC; Johnson TA
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):401-417. PubMed ID: 29952805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On a possible prognostic value of otoacoustic emissions: a study on patients with sudden hearing loss.
    Hoth S
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Mar; 262(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 15133692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Test-retest reliability of distortion-product thresholds compared to behavioral auditory thresholds.
    Bader K; Dierkes L; Braun LH; Gummer AW; Dalhoff E; Zelle D
    Hear Res; 2021 Jul; 406():108232. PubMed ID: 33984603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions and sensorineural hearing loss.
    Moulin A; Bera JC; Collet L
    Audiology; 1994; 33(6):305-26. PubMed ID: 7741665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. II. Interrelations between multicomponent DPOAEs, tone-burst-evoked OAEs, and spontaneous OAEs.
    Moulin A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1471-86. PubMed ID: 10738802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.
    Reavis KM; Phillips DS; Fausti SA; Gordon JS; Helt WJ; Wilmington D; Bratt GW; Konrad-Martin D
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):875-93. PubMed ID: 18753950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in middle-aged subjects with normal versus potentially presbyacusic high-frequency hearing loss.
    Nieschalk M; Hustert B; Stoll W
    Audiology; 1998; 37(2):83-99. PubMed ID: 9547922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.