BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37969143)

  • 1. Dosimetric Comparison between Single-energy Computed Tomography and Dual-energy Computed Tomography Relative to Stopping Power Estimation in Proton Therapy.
    Chirdchid T; Ruangchan S; Sanghangthum T
    J Med Phys; 2023; 48(3):292-297. PubMed ID: 37969143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dosimetric comparison of stopping power calibration with dual-energy CT and single-energy CT in proton therapy treatment planning.
    Zhu J; Penfold SN
    Med Phys; 2016 Jun; 43(6):2845-2854. PubMed ID: 27277033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of proton stopping power estimation of silicone breast implants with single and dual-energy CT calibration techniques.
    Chacko MS; Grewal HS; Wu D; Sonnad JR
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Sep; 22(9):159-170. PubMed ID: 34275175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of beam-hardening corrections on proton relative stopping power estimates from single- and dual-energy CT.
    Chacko MS; Wu D; Grewal HS; Sonnad JR
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Sep; 23(9):e13711. PubMed ID: 35816460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of proton therapy treatment planning for head tumors with a pencil beam algorithm on dual and single energy CT images.
    Hudobivnik N; Schwarz F; Johnson T; Agolli L; Dedes G; Tessonnier T; Verhaegen F; Thieke C; Belka C; Sommer WH; Parodi K; Landry G
    Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 43(1):495. PubMed ID: 26745942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Single energy CT-based mass density and relative stopping power estimation for proton therapy using deep learning method.
    Gao Y; Chang CW; Roper J; Axente M; Lei Y; Pan S; Bradley JD; Zhou J; Liu T; Yang X
    Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1278180. PubMed ID: 38074686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experimental comparison of photon versus particle computed tomography to predict tissue relative stopping powers.
    Bär E; Volz L; Collins-Fekete CA; Brons S; Runz A; Schulte RW; Seco J
    Med Phys; 2022 Jan; 49(1):474-487. PubMed ID: 34709667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Proton-Dose Calculation with Scripting and Modified Hounsfield Units.
    Kassaee A; Cheng C; Yin L; Zou W; Li T; Lin A; Swisher-McClure S; Lukens JN; Lustig RA; O'Reilly S; Dong L; Ms RH; Teo BK
    Int J Part Ther; 2021; 8(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 34285936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Learning-based synthetic dual energy CT imaging from single energy CT for stopping power ratio calculation in proton radiation therapy.
    Charyyev S; Wang T; Lei Y; Ghavidel B; Beitler JJ; McDonald M; Curran WJ; Liu T; Zhou J; Yang X
    Br J Radiol; 2022 Jan; 95(1129):20210644. PubMed ID: 34709948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dosimetric impact of dual-energy CT tissue segmentation for low-energy prostate brachytherapy: a Monte Carlo study.
    Remy C; Lalonde A; Béliveau-Nadeau D; Carrier JF; Bouchard H
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(2):025013. PubMed ID: 29260727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of relative proton stopping power measurements across patient size using dual- and single-energy CT.
    Michalak G; Taasti V; Krauss B; Deisher A; Halaweish A; McCollough C
    Acta Oncol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):1465-1471. PubMed ID: 28885130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of the impact of CT calibration procedures for proton therapy planning on pediatric treatments.
    Bär E; Collins-Fekete CA; Rompokos V; Zhang Y; Gaze MN; Warry A; Poynter A; Royle G
    Med Phys; 2021 Sep; 48(9):5202-5218. PubMed ID: 34174092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of single and dual energy CT for stopping power determination in proton therapy of head and neck cancer.
    Taasti VT; Muren LP; Jensen K; Petersen JBB; Thygesen J; Tietze A; Grau C; Hansen DC
    Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2018 Apr; 6():14-19. PubMed ID: 33458383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Revisiting the single-energy CT calibration for proton therapy treatment planning: a critical look at the stoichiometric method.
    Gomà C; Almeida IP; Verhaegen F
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Nov; 63(23):235011. PubMed ID: 30474618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experimental validation of two dual-energy CT methods for proton therapy using heterogeneous tissue samples.
    Bär E; Lalonde A; Zhang R; Jee KW; Yang K; Sharp G; Liu B; Royle G; Bouchard H; Lu HM
    Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):48-59. PubMed ID: 29134674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Split-filter dual energy computed tomography radiotherapy: From calibration to image guidance.
    Edmund J; Feen Rønjom M; van Overeem Felter M; Maare C; Margrete Juul Dam A; Tsaggari E; Wohlfahrt P
    Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2023 Oct; 28():100495. PubMed ID: 37876826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stopping-power ratio estimation for proton radiotherapy using dual-energy computed tomography and prior-image constrained denoising.
    Zimmerman J; Thor D; Poludniowski G
    Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 50(3):1481-1495. PubMed ID: 36322128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ex vivo validation of a stoichiometric dual energy CT proton stopping power ratio calibration.
    Xie Y; Ainsley C; Yin L; Zou W; McDonough J; Solberg TD; Lin A; Teo BK
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Mar; 63(5):055016. PubMed ID: 29513647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Initial Validation of Proton Dose Calculations on SPR Images from DECT in Treatment Planning System.
    Mossahebi S; Sabouri P; Chen H; Mundis M; O'Neil M; Maggi P; Polf JC
    Int J Part Ther; 2020; 7(2):51-61. PubMed ID: 33274257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Monte Carlo proton dose calculations using a radiotherapy specific dual-energy CT scanner for tissue segmentation and range assessment.
    Almeida IP; Schyns LEJR; Vaniqui A; van der Heyden B; Dedes G; Resch AF; Kamp F; Zindler JD; Parodi K; Landry G; Verhaegen F
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 May; 63(11):115008. PubMed ID: 29616662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.