These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37970301)
1. Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Neurological Conditions: Review of Concept and Methods. Mishra B; Sudheer P; Agarwal A; Srivastava MVP; Nilima ; Vishnu VY Ann Indian Acad Neurol; 2023; 26(4):334-343. PubMed ID: 37970301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What Is the Clinical Benefit of Common Orthopaedic Procedures as Assessed by the PROMIS Versus Other Validated Outcomes Tools? Karhade AV; Bernstein DN; Desai V; Bedair HS; O'Donnell EA; Tanaka MJ; Bono CM; Harris MB; Schwab JH; Tobert DG Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Sep; 480(9):1672-1681. PubMed ID: 35543521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What Are the Minimal and Substantial Improvements in the HOOS and KOOS and JR Versions After Total Joint Replacement? Lyman S; Lee YY; McLawhorn AS; Islam W; MacLean CH Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Dec; 476(12):2432-2441. PubMed ID: 30179951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What Are the Minimum Clinically Important Differences in SF-36 Scores in Patients with Orthopaedic Oncologic Conditions? Ogura K; Yakoub MA; Christ AB; Fujiwara T; Nikolic Z; Boland PJ; Healey JH Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Sep; 478(9):2148-2158. PubMed ID: 32568896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What is the Minimum Clinically Important Difference for the WOMAC Index After TKA? Clement ND; Bardgett M; Weir D; Holland J; Gerrand C; Deehan DJ Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Oct; 476(10):2005-2014. PubMed ID: 30179956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimal Clinically Important Difference for PROMIS Physical Function in Patients With Distal Radius Fractures. Sandvall B; Okoroafor UC; Gerull W; Guattery J; Calfee RP J Hand Surg Am; 2019 Jun; 44(6):454-459.e1. PubMed ID: 30954311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Scales Reported in Stroke Trials: A Review. Mishra B; Sudheer P; Agarwal A; Nilima N; Srivastava MVP; Vishnu VY Brain Sci; 2024 Jan; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 38248295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. What Are the MCIDs for PROMIS, NDI, and ODI Instruments Among Patients With Spinal Conditions? Hung M; Saltzman CL; Kendall R; Bounsanga J; Voss MW; Lawrence B; Spiker R; Brodke D Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Oct; 476(10):2027-2036. PubMed ID: 30179950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Minimal Clinically Important Difference Changes Greatly Based on the Different Calculation Methods. Franceschini M; Boffa A; Pignotti E; Andriolo L; Zaffagnini S; Filardo G Am J Sports Med; 2023 Mar; 51(4):1067-1073. PubMed ID: 36811558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bridging the gap between statistical significance and clinical relevance: A systematic review of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds of scales reported in movement disorders research. Mishra B; Sudheer P; Rajan R; Agarwal A; Srivastava MVP; Nilima N; Vishnu VY Heliyon; 2024 Mar; 10(5):e26479. PubMed ID: 38439837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimum Clinically Important Differences of the Hospital for Special Surgery Dysphagia and Dysphonia Inventory and Other Dysphagia Measurements in Patients Undergoing ACDF. Okano I; Ortiz Miller C; Salzmann SN; Hoshino Y; Shue J; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Hughes AP Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Oct; 478(10):2309-2320. PubMed ID: 32282534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Substantial Inconsistency and Variability Exists Among Minimum Clinically Important Differences for Shoulder Arthroplasty Outcomes: A Systematic Review. Kolin DA; Moverman MA; Pagani NR; Puzzitiello RN; Dubin J; Menendez ME; Jawa A; Kirsch JM Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Jul; 480(7):1371-1383. PubMed ID: 35302970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Standard Method for Determining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Rehabilitation Measures. Malec JF; Ketchum JM Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2020 Jun; 101(6):1090-1094. PubMed ID: 31953077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Most-Cited Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Within Otolaryngology-Revisiting the Minimal Clinically Important Difference: A Review. Peterson AM; Miller B; Ioerger P; Hentati F; Doering MM; Kallogjeri D; Piccirillo JF JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2023 Mar; 149(3):261-276. PubMed ID: 36729451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Approaches for estimating minimal clinically important differences in systemic lupus erythematosus. Rai SK; Yazdany J; Fortin PR; AviƱa-Zubieta JA Arthritis Res Ther; 2015 Jun; 17(1):143. PubMed ID: 26036334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Determining minimal clinically important difference estimates following surgery for degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine: analysis of the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) registry. Power JD; Perruccio AV; Canizares M; McIntosh G; Abraham E; Attabib N; Bailey CS; Charest-Morin R; Dea N; Finkelstein J; Fisher C; Glennie RA; Hall H; Johnson MG; Kelly AM; Kingwell S; Manson N; Nataraj A; Paquet J; Singh S; Soroceanu A; Thomas KC; Weber MH; Rampersaud YR Spine J; 2023 Sep; 23(9):1323-1333. PubMed ID: 37160168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimal Clinically Important Differences for American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Score in Hallux Valgus Surgery. Chan HY; Chen JY; Zainul-Abidin S; Ying H; Koo K; Rikhraj IS Foot Ankle Int; 2017 May; 38(5):551-557. PubMed ID: 28193121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimal Clinically Important Difference for PROMIS Physical Function and Pain Interference in Patients Following Surgical Treatment of Distal Radius Fracture. Hollenberg AM; Hammert WC J Hand Surg Am; 2022 Feb; 47(2):137-144. PubMed ID: 34711448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimal clinically important differences in the EORTC QLQ-C30 and brief pain inventory in patients undergoing re-irradiation for painful bone metastases. Raman S; Ding K; Chow E; Meyer RM; van der Linden YM; Roos D; Hartsell WF; Hoskin P; Wu JSY; Nabid A; Haas R; Wiggenraad R; Babington S; Demas WF; Wilson CF; Wong RKS; Zhu L; Brundage M Qual Life Res; 2018 Apr; 27(4):1089-1098. PubMed ID: 29188483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The anchor design of anchor-based method to determine the minimal clinically important difference: a systematic review. Zhang Y; Xi X; Huang Y Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2023 Jul; 21(1):74. PubMed ID: 37454099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]