BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37971482)

  • 21. [PRIMARY STUDY ON IMPLANT COVERAGE WITH LOCAL SOFT TISSUE IN IMMEDIATE IMPLANT-BASED BREAST RECONSTRUCTION].
    Li G; Mu L; Liu Y; Yang K; Peng Z; Bi Y
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Mar; 30(3):385-8. PubMed ID: 27281890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Nipple reconstruction after implant-based breast reconstruction: a "matched-pair" outcome analysis focusing on the effects of radiotherapy.
    Momeni A; Ghaly M; Gupta D; Gurtner G; Kahn DM; Karanas YL; Lee GK
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Sep; 66(9):1202-5. PubMed ID: 23664573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Modern Approaches to Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.
    Salibian AA; Karp NS
    Clin Plast Surg; 2023 Apr; 50(2):223-234. PubMed ID: 36813400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. 2020 special issue: Twenty years of breast reconstruction: Past, present, and future.
    Spiegel AJ; Kania K; Hamilton KL
    Breast J; 2020 Jan; 26(1):39-41. PubMed ID: 31971345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Pure fat grafting for breast reconstruction: An alternative autologous breast reconstruction.
    Siotos C; Aravind P; Prasath V; Rubano A; Youssef M; Habibi M; Manahan MA; Cooney CM; Rosson GD
    Breast J; 2020 Sep; 26(9):1788-1792. PubMed ID: 32945041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Favorable Outcome with Close Margins in Patients Undergoing Nipple/Skin Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction: 5-year Follow-up.
    Özkurt E; Tükenmez M; Güven E; Çelet Özden B; Öner G; Müslümanoğlu M; İğci A; Özmen V; Küçücük S; Cabioğlu N
    Balkan Med J; 2018 Jan; 35(1):84-92. PubMed ID: 28958980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fat grafting and breast reconstruction with implant: another option for irradiated breast cancer patients.
    Salgarello M; Visconti G; Barone-Adesi L
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Feb; 129(2):317-329. PubMed ID: 21987041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy: clinical outcomes and risk factors related complications.
    Laporta R; Longo B; Sorotos M; Farcomeni A; Patti C; Mastrangeli MR; Rubino C; Santanelli di Pompeo F
    J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2017 Dec; 51(6):427-435. PubMed ID: 28319433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Tattoo-only nipple-areola complex reconstruction: Another option for plastic surgeons.
    Cha HG; Kwon JG; Kim EK; Lee HJ
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2020 Apr; 73(4):696-702. PubMed ID: 31862266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Surgical outcomes and nipple projection using the modified skate flap for nipple-areolar reconstruction in a series of 422 implant reconstructions.
    Zhong T; Antony A; Cordeiro P
    Ann Plast Surg; 2009 May; 62(5):591-5. PubMed ID: 19387168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. PATIENT SATISFACTION AFTER BREAST RECONSTRUCTION: IMPLANTS VS. AUTOLOGOUS TISSUES.
    Fracon S; Renzi N; Manara M; Ramella V; Papa G; Arnež ZM
    Acta Chir Plast; 2018; 59(3-4):120-128. PubMed ID: 29651851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Autologous Fat Grafting After Breast Reconstruction in Postmastectomy Patients: Complications, Biopsy Rates, and Locoregional Cancer Recurrence Rates.
    Kaoutzanis C; Xin M; Ballard TN; Welch KB; Momoh AO; Kozlow JH; Brown DL; Cederna PS; Wilkins EG
    Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Mar; 76(3):270-5. PubMed ID: 26101979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Autologous fat grafting in secondary breast reconstruction.
    Losken A; Pinell XA; Sikoro K; Yezhelyev MV; Anderson E; Carlson GW
    Ann Plast Surg; 2011 May; 66(5):518-22. PubMed ID: 21451387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Breast reconstruction.
    Kaya B; Serel S
    Exp Oncol; 2013 Dec; 35(4):280-6. PubMed ID: 24382438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Integration of plastic surgery in the course of breast-conserving surgery for cancer to improve cosmetic results and radicality of tumor excision.
    Petit JY; Rietjens M; Garusi C; Greuze M; Perry C
    Recent Results Cancer Res; 1998; 152():202-11. PubMed ID: 9928559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Long-term Patient-Reported Outcomes in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.
    Santosa KB; Qi J; Kim HM; Hamill JB; Wilkins EG; Pusic AL
    JAMA Surg; 2018 Oct; 153(10):891-899. PubMed ID: 29926096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Revision Rates in Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Delayed-Immediate Autologous Breast Reconstruction.
    Patel AA; Cemaj SL; Martin SA; Cheesborough JE; Lee GK; Nazerali RS
    Ann Plast Surg; 2021 May; 86(5S Suppl 3):S409-S413. PubMed ID: 33833169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Autologous fat grafting in onco-plastic breast reconstruction: A systematic review on oncological and radiological safety, complications, volume retention and patient/surgeon satisfaction.
    Groen JW; Negenborn VL; Twisk DJWR; Rizopoulos D; Ket JCF; Smit JM; Mullender MG
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2016 Jun; 69(6):742-764. PubMed ID: 27085611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Nipple-areola reconstruction: satisfaction and clinical determinants.
    Jabor MA; Shayani P; Collins DR; Karas T; Cohen BE
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Aug; 110(2):457-63; discussion 464-5. PubMed ID: 12142660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Breast reconstruction after mastectomy: necessity, evolution, techniques and research goals].
    Engels PE; Thuerlimann AC; Schulz SN; Kalbermatten DF
    Rev Med Suisse; 2023 Jun; 19(831):1180-1185. PubMed ID: 37314257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.