These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3797202)

  • 1. Spatial organization of the diplesthetic and nondiplesthetic areas of the fingers.
    Benedetti F
    Perception; 1986; 15(3):285-301. PubMed ID: 3797202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reorganization of tactile perception following the simulated amputation of one finger.
    Benedetti F
    Perception; 1991; 20(5):687-92. PubMed ID: 1806910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tactile diplopia (diplesthesia) on the human fingers.
    Benedetti F
    Perception; 1986; 15(1):83-91. PubMed ID: 3774481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A four-channel analysis of the tactile sensitivity of the fingertip: frequency selectivity, spatial summation, and temporal summation.
    Gescheider GA; Bolanowski SJ; Pope JV; Verrillo RT
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2002; 19(2):114-24. PubMed ID: 12088385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vibrotactile Sensitivity in Active Touch: Effect of Pressing Force.
    Papetti S; Jarvelainen H; Giordano BL; Schiesser S; Frohlich M
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2017; 10(1):113-122. PubMed ID: 27390182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multiple spatial representations determine touch localization on the fingers.
    Badde S; Röder B; Heed T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):784-801. PubMed ID: 24364704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cutaneous afferents from the monkeys fingers: responses to tangential and normal forces.
    Wheat HE; Salo LM; Goodwin AW
    J Neurophysiol; 2010 Feb; 103(2):950-61. PubMed ID: 19955296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pattern identification and perceived stimulus quality as a function of stimulation waveform on a fingertip-scanned electrotactile display.
    Kaczmarek KA; Haase SJ
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Mar; 11(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 12797720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diminutive digits discern delicate details: fingertip size and the sex difference in tactile spatial acuity.
    Peters RM; Hackeman E; Goldreich D
    J Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 29(50):15756-61. PubMed ID: 20016091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship between vibrotactile detection threshold in the Pacinian channel and complex mechanical modulus of the human glabrous skin.
    Yildiz MZ; Güçlü B
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2013; 30(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 23323828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of contact location on vibrotactile thresholds at the fingertip.
    Whitehouse DJ; Morioka M; Griffin MJ
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2006; 23(1-2):73-81. PubMed ID: 16846962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamic cutaneous information is sufficient for precise curvature discrimination.
    Cheeseman JR; Norman JF; Kappers AM
    Sci Rep; 2016 May; 6():25473. PubMed ID: 27137417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A physical constraint on perceptual learning: tactile spatial acuity improves with training to a limit set by finger size.
    Wong M; Peters RM; Goldreich D
    J Neurosci; 2013 May; 33(22):9345-52. PubMed ID: 23719803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Grating orientation as a measure of tactile spatial acuity.
    Craig JC
    Somatosens Mot Res; 1999; 16(3):197-206. PubMed ID: 10527368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Human ability to discriminate direction of three-dimensional force stimuli applied to the finger pad.
    Panarese A; Edin BB
    J Neurophysiol; 2011 Feb; 105(2):541-7. PubMed ID: 21106897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of the biodynamic interaction between the fingertip and probe in the vibrotactile tests: the influences of the probe/fingertip contact orientation and static indentation.
    Wu JZ; Krajnak K; Welcome DE; Dong RG
    J Biomech; 2009 Jan; 42(2):116-24. PubMed ID: 19110251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perception of electrical and mechanical stimulation of the skin: implications for electrotactile feedback.
    Marcus PL; Fuglevand AJ
    J Neural Eng; 2009 Dec; 6(6):066008. PubMed ID: 19918109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relative contribution ratios of skin and proprioceptive sensations in perception of force applied to fingertip.
    Matsui K; Okamoto S; Yamada Y
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2014 Mar; 7(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 24845748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of changing skin mechanics on the differential sensitivity to surface compliance by tactile afferents in the human finger pad.
    Hudson KM; Condon M; Ackerley R; McGlone F; Olausson H; Macefield VG; Birznieks I
    J Neurophysiol; 2015 Oct; 114(4):2249-57. PubMed ID: 26269550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The contribution of cutaneous and kinesthetic sensory modalities in haptic perception of orientation.
    Frisoli A; Solazzi M; Reiner M; Bergamasco M
    Brain Res Bull; 2011 Jun; 85(5):260-6. PubMed ID: 21134423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.