146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37972580)
1. Plug-and-play microphones for recording speech and voice with smart devices.
Noffs G; Cobler-Lichter M; Perera T; Kolbe SC; Butzkueven H; Boonstra FMC; van der Walt A; Vogel AP
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 37972580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Acoustic Voice Features Derived From Mobile Devices and Studio Microphone Recordings.
Fahed VS; Doheny EP; Busse M; Hoblyn J; Lowery MM
J Voice; 2022 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 36379826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validity of Acoustic Measures Obtained Using Various Recording Methods Including Smartphones With and Without Headset Microphones.
Awan SN; Bahr R; Watts S; Boyer M; Budinsky R; ; Bensoussan Y
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2024 Jun; 67(6):1712-1730. PubMed ID: 38749007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microphone and Audio Compression Effects on Acoustic Voice Analysis: A Pilot Study.
Cavalcanti JC; Englert M; Oliveira M; Constantini AC
J Voice; 2023 Mar; 37(2):162-172. PubMed ID: 33451892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Effect of Microphone Frequency Response on Spectral and Cepstral Measures of Voice: An Examination of Low-Cost Electret Headset Microphones.
Awan SN; Shaikh MA; Desjardins M; Feinstein H; Abbott KV
Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2022 Mar; 31(2):959-973. PubMed ID: 35050724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Combined Use of Standard and Throat Microphones for Measurement of Acoustic Voice Parameters and Voice Categorization.
Uloza V; Padervinskis E; Uloziene I; Saferis V; Verikas A
J Voice; 2015 Sep; 29(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 25795349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Exploring the feasibility of smart phone microphone for measurement of acoustic voice parameters and voice pathology screening.
Uloza V; Padervinskis E; Vegiene A; Pribuisiene R; Saferis V; Vaiciukynas E; Gelzinis A; Verikas A
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Nov; 272(11):3391-9. PubMed ID: 26162450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reproducibility of Voice Parameters: The Effect of Room Acoustics and Microphones.
Bottalico P; Codino J; Cantor-Cutiva LC; Marks K; Nudelman CJ; Skeffington J; Shrivastav R; Jackson-Menaldi MC; Hunter EJ; Rubin AD
J Voice; 2020 May; 34(3):320-334. PubMed ID: 30471944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mobile Digital Recording: Adequacy of the iRig and iOS Device for Acoustic and Perceptual Analysis of Normal Voice.
Oliveira G; Fava G; Baglione M; Pimpinella M
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):236-242. PubMed ID: 27423820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech intelligibility in noise using throat and acoustic microphones.
Acker-Mills BE; Houtsma AJ; Ahroon WA
Aviat Space Environ Med; 2006 Jan; 77(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 16422450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Captured With a Smartphone - Measurements With Added Ambient Noise.
Uloza V; Ulozaitė-Stanienė N; Petrauskas T; Kregždytė R
J Voice; 2023 May; 37(3):465.e19-465.e26. PubMed ID: 33676807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of Acoustic Analyses of Voice in Nonoptimized Conditions.
van der Woerd B; Wu M; Parsa V; Doyle PC; Fung K
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Dec; 63(12):3991-3999. PubMed ID: 33186510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the Acoustic Parameters Obtained With Different Smartphones and a Professional Microphone.
Marsano-Cornejo MJ; Roco-Videla Á
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp (Engl Ed); 2022; 73(1):51-55. PubMed ID: 35190088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of microphone type and placement on voice perturbation measurements.
Titze IR; Winholtz WS
J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Dec; 36(6):1177-90. PubMed ID: 8114484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Methods to study pre-school teachers' voice at work: simultaneous recordings with a voice accumulator and a DAT recorder.
Szabo A; Hammarberg B; Granqvist S; Södersten M
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2003; 28(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 12884905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Factors influencing individual variation in perceptual directional microphone benefit.
Keidser G; Dillon H; Convery E; Mejia J
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):955-68. PubMed ID: 24384081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the acoustic parameters obtained with different smartphones and a professional microphone.
Marsano-Cornejo MJ; Roco-Videla Á
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp (Engl Ed); 2021 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 33413843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Speech recognition for bilaterally asymmetric and symmetric hearing aid microphone modes in simulated classroom environments.
Ricketts TA; Picou EM
Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):601-9. PubMed ID: 23524508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mobile Communication Devices, Ambient Noise, and Acoustic Voice Measures.
Maryn Y; Ysenbaert F; Zarowski A; Vanspauwen R
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):248.e11-248.e23. PubMed ID: 27692682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving Cochlear Implant Performance in the Wind Through Spectral Masking Release: A Multi-microphone and Multichannel Strategy.
Chung K
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(2):420-432. PubMed ID: 31425361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
