These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37973434)

  • 1. Gender Attributions by Cisgender and Gender Diverse Listeners Rating Vowels, Reading, and Monologues.
    Hancock AB; Hao G; Ni A; Liu H; Johnson LW
    J Voice; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 37973434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of Anchor Term on Auditory-Perceptual Ratings of Feminine and Masculine Speakers.
    Houle N; Goudelias D; Lerario MP; Levi SV
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Jun; 65(6):2064-2080. PubMed ID: 35452247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Examining the voice of Israeli transgender women: Acoustic measures, voice femininity and voice-related quality-of-life.
    Diamant N; Amir O
    Int J Transgend Health; 2021; 22(3):281-293. PubMed ID: 34240071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Looking to understand: the coupling between speakers' and listeners' eye movements and its relationship to discourse comprehension.
    Richardson DC; Dale R
    Cogn Sci; 2005 Nov; 29(6):1045-60. PubMed ID: 21702802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of listeners' linguistic background on perceptual judgements of hypernasality.
    Lee A; Brown S; Gibbon FE
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2008; 43(5):487-98. PubMed ID: 22612628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differences and Similarities in the Perception of Voice Gender for Individuals Who are or are not Members of the LGBT+ Community.
    Brennan C; Hannah AC; Romick J; Lewon JW; Meyers C
    J Voice; 2022 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 36470822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gender expansive listeners utilize a non-binary, multidimensional conception of gender to inform voice gender perception.
    Hope M; Lilley J
    Brain Lang; 2022 Jan; 224():105049. PubMed ID: 34826679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. English vowel identification in quiet and noise: effects of listeners' native language background.
    Jin SH; Liu C
    Front Neurosci; 2014; 8():305. PubMed ID: 25400538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptual Evaluation of Speech Naturalness in Speakers of Varying Gender Identities.
    Merritt B; Bent T
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Jul; 63(7):2054-2069. PubMed ID: 32598195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perception of coarticulatory nasalization by speakers of English and Thai: evidence for partial compensation.
    Beddor PS; Krakow RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Nov; 106(5):2868-87. PubMed ID: 10573902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acoustic Predictors of Gender Attribution, Masculinity-Femininity, and Vocal Naturalness Ratings Amongst Transgender and Cisgender Speakers.
    Hardy TLD; Rieger JM; Wells K; Boliek CA
    J Voice; 2020 Mar; 34(2):300.e11-300.e26. PubMed ID: 30503396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do Voice-Based Judgments of Socially Relevant Speaker Traits Differ Across Speech Types?
    Groyecka-Bernard A; Pisanski K; Frąckowiak T; Kobylarek A; Kupczyk P; Oleszkiewicz A; Sabiniewicz A; Wróbel M; Sorokowski P
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Oct; 65(10):3674-3694. PubMed ID: 36167068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceptual Cue Weighting Is Influenced by the Listener's Gender and Subjective Evaluations of the Speaker: The Case of English Stop Voicing.
    Yu ACL
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():840291. PubMed ID: 35529558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of Phonation on Perception of Femininity/Masculinity in Transgender and Cisgender Speakers.
    Houle N; Levi SV
    J Voice; 2021 May; 35(3):497.e23-497.e37. PubMed ID: 31848063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intonation Parameters in Gender Diverse People.
    Papeleu T; Leyns C; Tomassen P; T'Sjoen G; Van Lierde K; D'haeseleer E
    J Voice; 2023 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 36646570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Listeners' attitude toward people with dysphonia.
    Amir O; Levine-Yundof R
    J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):524.e1-10. PubMed ID: 23490129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Listener Age and Gender Diversity: Effects on Voice-based Perception of Gender.
    Brown KM; Dahl KL; Cler GJ; Stepp CE
    J Voice; 2021 Sep; 35(5):739-745. PubMed ID: 32165021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictive Factors of Listeners' Attitudes Related to Dysphonic Voices in Native Brazilian Portuguese.
    Evangelista DDS; Alves GÂDS; Almeida AA; Lopes LW
    J Voice; 2022 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 36517327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intelligibility of dysarthric speech: perceptions of speakers and listeners.
    Walshe M; Miller N; Leahy M; Murray A
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2008; 43(6):633-48. PubMed ID: 18608608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Revisiting the acoustics of speaker gender perception: A gender expansive perspective.
    Merritt B; Bent T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Jan; 151(1):484. PubMed ID: 35105035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.