168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37973685)
21. Muscle Strength and Physical Performance Improve Fracture Risk Prediction Beyond Garvan and FRAX: The Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study.
Alajlouni D; Tran T; Bliuc D; Blank RD; Cawthon PM; Orwoll ES; Center JR
J Bone Miner Res; 2022 Mar; 37(3):411-419. PubMed ID: 34842309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Five-year fracture risk assessment in postmenopausal women, using both the POL-RISK calculator and the Garvan nomogram: the Silesia Osteo Active Study.
Zagórski P; Tabor E; Martela-Tomaszek K; Adamczyk P; Pluskiewicz W
Arch Osteoporos; 2021 Feb; 16(1):32. PubMed ID: 33594643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Discriminative value of FRAX for fracture prediction in a cohort of Chinese postmenopausal women.
Cheung EY; Bow CH; Cheung CL; Soong C; Yeung S; Loong C; Kung A
Osteoporos Int; 2012 Mar; 23(3):871-8. PubMed ID: 21562875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Personalized fracture risk assessment: where are we at?
Nguyen TV
Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab; 2021 Jul; 16(4):191-200. PubMed ID: 33982611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Fracture Risk Assessment: From Population to Individual.
Nguyen TV; Eisman JA
J Clin Densitom; 2017; 20(3):368-378. PubMed ID: 28729045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Low dietary calcium intake does not modify fracture risk but increases fall frequency: the results of GO Study.
Pluskiewicz W; Adamczyk P; Drozdzowska B
Endokrynol Pol; 2021; 72(3):198-201. PubMed ID: 33749809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Performance of Fracture Risk Assessment Tools by Race and Ethnicity: A Systematic Review for the ASBMR Task Force on Clinical Algorithms for Fracture Risk.
Fink HA; Butler ME; Claussen AM; Collins ES; Krohn KM; Taylor BC; Tikabo SS; Vang D; Zerzan NL; Ensrud KE
J Bone Miner Res; 2023 Dec; 38(12):1731-1741. PubMed ID: 37597237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Correlation between osteoporotic fracture risk in Brazilian postmenopausal women calculated using the FRAX with and without the inclusion of bone densitometry data.
Bastos-Silva Y; Aguiar LB; Pinto-Neto AM; Baccaro LF; Costa-Paiva L
Arch Osteoporos; 2016; 11():16. PubMed ID: 27067597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Validation of FRAX and the impact of self-reported falls among elderly in a general population: the HUNT study, Norway.
Hoff M; Meyer HE; Skurtveit S; Langhammer A; Søgaard AJ; Syversen U; Dhainaut A; Skovlund E; Abrahamsen B; Schei B
Osteoporos Int; 2017 Oct; 28(10):2935-2944. PubMed ID: 28668994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Fracture risk prediction using FRAX®: a 10-year follow-up survey of the Japanese Population-Based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Cohort Study.
Tamaki J; Iki M; Kadowaki E; Sato Y; Kajita E; Kagamimori S; Kagawa Y; Yoneshima H
Osteoporos Int; 2011 Dec; 22(12):3037-45. PubMed ID: 21279504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Validation of the Taiwan FRAX® calculator for the prediction of fracture risk.
Liu IT; Liang FW; Li CC; Chang YF; Sun ZJ; Lu TH; Chang CS; Wu CH
Arch Osteoporos; 2022 Jan; 17(1):27. PubMed ID: 35094177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. FRAX® based intervention thresholds for management of osteoporosis in Singaporean women.
Chandran M; McCloskey EV; Thu WPP; Logan S; Hao Y; Tay D; Ang WC; Aung TKK; Choo KS; Ali A; Yan SX; Huang XF; Liu XM; Yong EL; Lekamwasam S
Arch Osteoporos; 2018 Nov; 13(1):130. PubMed ID: 30456726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Implications of expanding indications for drug treatment to prevent fracture in older men in United States: cross sectional and longitudinal analysis of prospective cohort study.
Ensrud KE; Taylor BC; Peters KW; Gourlay ML; Donaldson MG; Leslie WD; Blackwell TL; Fink HA; Orwoll ES; Schousboe J;
BMJ; 2014 Jul; 349():g4120. PubMed ID: 24994809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) and for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in Japanese middle-aged and elderly women: Chiba bone survey.
Oka R; Ohira M; Suzuki S; Yoshida T; Koide H; Tanaka T; Tatsuno I
Endocr J; 2018 Feb; 65(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 29151451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Worldwide Fracture Prediction.
El-Hajj Fuleihan G; Chakhtoura M; Cauley JA; Chamoun N
J Clin Densitom; 2017; 20(3):397-424. PubMed ID: 28734709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Setting the new FRAX reference threshold without bone mineral density in Chinese postmenopausal women.
Liu S; Chen R; Ding N; Wang Q; Huang M; Liu H; Xie Z; Ou Y; Sheng Z
J Endocrinol Invest; 2021 Feb; 44(2):347-352. PubMed ID: 32495298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Sarcopenia combined with FRAX probabilities improves fracture risk prediction in older Chinese men.
Yu R; Leung J; Woo J
J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2014 Dec; 15(12):918-23. PubMed ID: 25262197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. An optimal intervention threshold of FRAX in postmenopausal Thai women.
Sribenjalak D; Charoensri S; Pongchaiyakul C
Arch Osteoporos; 2022 Jan; 17(1):21. PubMed ID: 35072805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of Race/Ethnicity on United States FRAX Calculations and Treatment Qualification: A Registry-Based Study.
Leslie WD;
J Bone Miner Res; 2023 Dec; 38(12):1742-1748. PubMed ID: 37548387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Rationale of the Spanish FRAX model in decision-making for predicting osteoporotic fractures: an update of FRIDEX cohort of Spanish women.
Azagra R; Zwart M; Encabo G; Aguyé A; Martin-Sánchez JC; Puchol-Ruiz N; Gabriel-Escoda P; Ortiz-Alinque S; Gené E; Iglesias M; Moriña D; Diaz-Herrera MA; Utzet M; Manresa JM;
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Jun; 17():262. PubMed ID: 27317560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
