BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3797390)

  • 1. Effect of population screening for cancer of the uterine cervix in Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
    van der Graaf Y; Klinkhamer PJ; Vooijs GP
    Prev Med; 1986 Nov; 15(6):582-90. PubMed ID: 3797390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Population screening for cervical cancer in the region of Nijmegen, The Netherlands 1976-1985.
    van der Graaf Y; Vooijs PG; Zielhuis GA
    Gynecol Oncol; 1988 Jul; 30(3):388-97. PubMed ID: 3391422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Registration of carcinoma in situ and squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix in the screening area of Nijmegen from 1 January 1970 through 31 July 1982].
    Klinkhamer PJ; van der Graaf Y; Vooijs GP
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1984 Oct; 128(42):1979-83. PubMed ID: 6504185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cervical cancer in the Netherlands 1989-1998: Decrease of squamous cell carcinoma in older women, increase of adenocarcinoma in younger women.
    Bulk S; Visser O; Rozendaal L; Verheijen RH; Meijer CJ
    Int J Cancer; 2005 Mar; 113(6):1005-9. PubMed ID: 15515017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Results of the Leiden mass screening for cervix uteri carcinoma; the 'young' (24-34 years) versus the 'old' (35-54 years) group of women].
    Boon ME; de Graaff Guilloud-Gentenaar JC; Beck S
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1990 Aug; 134(32):1545-9. PubMed ID: 2392176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Increasing incidence of invasive and in situ cervical adenocarcinoma in the Netherlands during 2004-2013.
    van der Horst J; Siebers AG; Bulten J; Massuger LF; de Kok IM
    Cancer Med; 2017 Feb; 6(2):416-423. PubMed ID: 28102052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Population-based cervical screening with a 5-year interval in The Netherlands. Stabilization of the incidence of squamous cell carcinoma and its precursor lesions in the screened population.
    Siemens FC; Boon ME; Kuypers JC; Kok LP
    Acta Cytol; 2004; 48(3):348-54. PubMed ID: 15192950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy of screening for cervical squamous and adenocarcinoma. The Dutch experience.
    Boon ME; de Graaff Guilloud JC; Kok LP; Olthof PM; van Erp EJ
    Cancer; 1987 Feb; 59(4):862-6. PubMed ID: 3802045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recent negative cytology prior to histologically confirmed carcinoma in situ of the cervix.
    Mitchell H; Higgins V
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1994 May; 34(2):178-81. PubMed ID: 7980308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Screening for cervical cancers in prostitutes.
    Lim KB; Tham SN; Sng I; Tan T
    Singapore Med J; 1987 Aug; 28(4):300-3. PubMed ID: 3423794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of cytologic screening on the detection of cervical carcinoma.
    Yajima A; Mori T; Sato S; Wakisaka T; Suzuki M
    Obstet Gynecol; 1982 May; 59(5):565-8. PubMed ID: 7070726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of regular 3-yearly screening on the incidence of cervical smears: the Leiden experience.
    Boon ME; de Graaff Guilloud JC; Rietveld WJ; Wijsman-Grootendorst A
    Cytopathology; 1990; 1(4):201-10. PubMed ID: 2101670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mass screening programmes and trends in cervical cancer in Finland and the Netherlands.
    van der Aa MA; Pukkala E; Coebergh JW; Anttila A; Siesling S
    Int J Cancer; 2008 Apr; 122(8):1854-8. PubMed ID: 18067129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Urbanization and the incidence of abnormalities of squamous and glandular epithelium of the cervix.
    Boon ME; van Ravenswaay Claasen HH; van Westering RP; Kok LP
    Cancer; 2003 Feb; 99(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 12589639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Carcinoma of the cervix in Southwestern American indians: results of a cytologic detection program.
    Jordan SW; Key CR
    Cancer; 1981 May; 47(10):2523-32. PubMed ID: 7272903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Studies on the prevalence and incidence rate of epithelial neoplasia of the uterine cervix by mass survey using mobile units].
    Hando T; Sugimori H; Higashiiwai H; Kuroshima Y; Nishiya I; Sugimoto O; Noda K
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1985 Nov; 37(11):2287-90. PubMed ID: 4078419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Results of cytologic mass screening in the Federal Republic of Germany.
    Soost HJ; Bockmühl B; Zock H
    Acta Cytol; 1982; 26(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 6957096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trends in the incidence of in situ and invasive cervical cancer by age group and histological type in Korea from 1993 to 2009.
    Oh CM; Jung KW; Won YJ; Shin A; Kong HJ; Jun JK; Park SY
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(8):e72012. PubMed ID: 23977194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Increase of in-situ cervix uteri carcinoma in women under 35; data analysis from family practice 1974-1986].
    Boon ME; Rietveld WJ; de Graaff Guilloud JC
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1988 Jul; 132(27):1240-3. PubMed ID: 2840584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Epidemiology of cervical carcinoma in Brunei Darussalam. Analysis of data on 27,208 women screened with cytologic examinations.
    Affandi MZ; Dun T; Mantuano V; Sidhu R; Lumplugh C; Telisinghe PU
    Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 8465637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.