183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37974203)
1. Contribution of macrophages to neural survival and intracochlear tissue remodeling responses following cochlear implantation.
Rahman MT; Mostaert BJ; Hunger B; Saha U; Claussen AD; Razu I; Nasrin F; Khan NA; Eckard P; Coleman S; Oleson J; Kirk JR; Hirose K; Hansen MR
J Neuroinflammation; 2023 Nov; 20(1):266. PubMed ID: 37974203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contribution of macrophages to intracochlear tissue remodeling responses following cochlear implantation and neural survival.
Rahman MT; Mostaert BJ; Hunger B; Saha U; Claussen AD; Razu I; Farjana N; Khan NA; Coleman S; Oleson J; Kirk J; Keiko H; Hansen MR
Res Sq; 2023 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 37461619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Chronic cochlear implantation with and without electric stimulation in a mouse model induces robust cochlear influx of CX3CR1
Claussen AD; Quevedo RV; Kirk JR; Higgins T; Mostaert B; Rahman MT; Oleson J; Hernandez R; Hirose K; Hansen MR
Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108510. PubMed ID: 35527124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development of an electrode for the artificial cochlear sensory epithelium.
Tona Y; Inaoka T; Ito J; Kawano S; Nakagawa T
Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt A):106-12. PubMed ID: 26299844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Immune Response of Macrophage Population to Cochlear Implantation: Cochlea Immune Cells.
Noonan KY; Lopez IA; Ishiyama G; Ishiyama A
Otol Neurotol; 2020 Oct; 41(9):1288-1295. PubMed ID: 32925862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Electrical impedance measurements of cochlear structures using the four-electrode reflection-coefficient technique.
Kumar G; Chokshi M; Richter CP
Hear Res; 2010 Jan; 259(1-2):86-94. PubMed ID: 19857561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impedance Changes and Fibrous Tissue Growth after Cochlear Implantation Are Correlated and Can Be Reduced Using a Dexamethasone Eluting Electrode.
Wilk M; Hessler R; Mugridge K; Jolly C; Fehr M; Lenarz T; Scheper V
PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0147552. PubMed ID: 26840740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Delayed low frequency hearing loss caused by cochlear implantation interventions via the round window but not cochleostomy.
Rowe D; Chambers S; Hampson A; Eastwood H; Campbell L; O'Leary S
Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():49-57. PubMed ID: 26739790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation between word recognition score and intracochlear new bone and fibrous tissue after cochlear implantation in the human.
Kamakura T; Nadol JB
Hear Res; 2016 Sep; 339():132-41. PubMed ID: 27371868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cochlear pathology following reimplantation of a multichannel scala tympani electrode array in the macaque.
Shepherd RK; Clark GM; Xu SA; Pyman BC
Am J Otol; 1995 Mar; 16(2):186-99. PubMed ID: 8572119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An overview of cochlear implant electrode array designs.
Dhanasingh A; Jolly C
Hear Res; 2017 Dec; 356():93-103. PubMed ID: 29102129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative Impacts of Scala Vestibuli Versus Scala Tympani Cochlear Implantation on Auditory Performances and Programming Parameters in Partially Ossified Cochleae.
Trudel M; Côté M; Philippon D; Simonyan D; Villemure-Poliquin N; Bussières R
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Jul; 39(6):700-706. PubMed ID: 29702527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cochlear implantation in the mouse via the round window: effects of array insertion.
Mistry N; Nolan LS; Saeed SR; Forge A; Taylor RR
Hear Res; 2014 Jun; 312():81-90. PubMed ID: 24657211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Delayed loss of hearing after hearing preservation cochlear implantation: Human temporal bone pathology and implications for etiology.
Quesnel AM; Nakajima HH; Rosowski JJ; Hansen MR; Gantz BJ; Nadol JB
Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():225-234. PubMed ID: 26341474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Encapsulated cell device approach for combined electrical stimulation and neurotrophic treatment of the deaf cochlea.
Konerding WS; Janssen H; Hubka P; Tornøe J; Mistrik P; Wahlberg L; Lenarz T; Kral A; Scheper V
Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():110-121. PubMed ID: 28463804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.
Xu J; Shepherd RK; Millard RE; Clark GM
Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electrophysiological detection of scalar changing perimodiolar cochlear electrode arrays: a long term follow-up study.
Mittmann P; Todt I; Ernst A; Rademacher G; Mutze S; Göricke S; Schlamann M; Ramalingam R; Lang S; Christov F; Arweiler-Harbeck D
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Dec; 273(12):4251-4256. PubMed ID: 27351885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Insertion site and sealing technique affect residual hearing and tissue formation after cochlear implantation.
Burghard A; Lenarz T; Kral A; Paasche G
Hear Res; 2014 Jun; 312():21-7. PubMed ID: 24566091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of focused multipolar stimulation for cochlear implants: a preclinical safety study.
Shepherd RK; Wise AK; Enke YL; Carter PM; Fallon JB
J Neural Eng; 2017 Aug; 14(4):046020. PubMed ID: 28607224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intraoperative Electrophysiologic Variations Caused by the Scalar Position of Cochlear Implant Electrodes.
Mittmann P; Ernst A; Todt I
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jul; 36(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 25730445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
