These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37974385)

  • 1. Is noncoplanar plan more robust to inter-fractional variations than coplanar plan in treating bilateral HN tumors with pencil-beam scanning proton beams?
    Yi B; Jatczak J; Deng W; Poirier YP; Yao W; Witek ME; Molitoris JK; Zakhary MJ; Zhang B; Biswal NC; Ferris MJ; Mossahebi S
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 25(2):e14186. PubMed ID: 37974385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Integrated beam orientation and scanning-spot optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy for brain and unilateral head and neck tumors.
    Gu W; O'Connor D; Nguyen D; Yu VY; Ruan D; Dong L; Sheng K
    Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 45(4):1338-1350. PubMed ID: 29394454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of robust treatment planning on single- and multi-field optimized plans for proton beam therapy of unilateral head and neck target volumes.
    Cubillos-Mesías M; Baumann M; Troost EGC; Lohaus F; Löck S; Richter C; Stützer K
    Radiat Oncol; 2017 Nov; 12(1):190. PubMed ID: 29183377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robust beam orientation optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy.
    Gu W; Neph R; Ruan D; Zou W; Dong L; Sheng K
    Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 46(8):3356-3370. PubMed ID: 31169917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigating the utilization of beam-specific apertures for the intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) head and neck cancer plans.
    Rana S; Storey M; Manthala Padannayil N; Shamurailatpam DS; Bennouna J; George J; Chang J
    Med Dosim; 2021 Summer; 46(2):e7-e11. PubMed ID: 33246881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance evaluation of adaptive aperture's static and dynamic collimation in a compact pencil beam scanning proton therapy system: A dosimetric comparison study for multiple disease sites.
    Grewal HS; Ahmad S; Jin H
    Med Dosim; 2021 Summer; 46(2):179-187. PubMed ID: 33279369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spot scanning proton arc therapy reduces toxicity in oropharyngeal cancer patients.
    de Jong BA; Battinelli C; Free J; Wagenaar D; Engwall E; Janssens G; Langendijk JA; Korevaar EW; Both S
    Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 50(3):1305-1317. PubMed ID: 36373893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing proton treatment plans of pediatric brain tumors in two pencil beam scanning nozzles with different spot sizes.
    Kralik JC; Xi L; Solberg TD; Simone CB; Lin L
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 16(6):41-50. PubMed ID: 26699553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Feasibility and robustness of dose painting by numbers in proton therapy with contour-driven plan optimization.
    Barragán AM; Differding S; Janssens G; Lee JA; Sterpin E
    Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):2006-17. PubMed ID: 25832091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Small spot size versus large spot size: Effect on plan quality for lung cancer in pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
    Rana S; Rosenfeld AB
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Feb; 23(2):e13512. PubMed ID: 34989458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiple-CT optimization: An adaptive optimization method to account for anatomical changes in intensity-modulated proton therapy for head and neck cancers.
    Yang Z; Zhang X; Wang X; Zhu XR; Gunn B; Frank SJ; Chang Y; Li Q; Yang K; Wu G; Liao L; Li Y; Chen M; Li H
    Radiother Oncol; 2020 Jan; 142():124-132. PubMed ID: 31564553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of single-energy proton pencil beam scanning Bragg peak for intensity-modulated proton therapy FLASH treatment planning in liver-hypofractionated radiation therapy.
    Wei S; Lin H; Shi C; Xiong W; Chen CC; Huang S; Press RH; Hasan S; Chhabra AM; Choi JI; Simone CB; Kang M
    Med Phys; 2022 Oct; 49(10):6560-6574. PubMed ID: 35929404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Noncoplanar VMAT for nasopharyngeal tumors: Plan quality versus treatment time.
    Wild E; Bangert M; Nill S; Oelfke U
    Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2157-68. PubMed ID: 25979010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of organ-at-risk sparing and plan robustness for spot-scanning proton therapy and volumetric modulated arc photon therapy in head-and-neck cancer.
    Barten DL; Tol JP; Dahele M; Slotman BJ; Verbakel WF
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6589-98. PubMed ID: 26520750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of Fully Automated Robust Multicriterial Treatment Planning for Head and Neck Cancer IMPT.
    Huiskes M; Kong W; Oud M; Crama K; Rasch C; Breedveld S; Heijmen B; Astreinidou E
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2024 Jul; 119(3):968-977. PubMed ID: 38284961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantification of plan robustness against different uncertainty sources for classical and anatomical robust optimized treatment plans in head and neck cancer proton therapy.
    Cubillos-Mesías M; Troost EGC; Lohaus F; Agolli L; Rehm M; Richter C; Stützer K
    Br J Radiol; 2020 Mar; 93(1107):20190573. PubMed ID: 31778315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy planning for head and neck cancers.
    Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Park PC; Dong L; Ronald Zhu X; Mohan R
    Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051711. PubMed ID: 23635259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Partitioning of discrete proton arcs into interlaced subplans can bring proton arc advances to existing proton facilities.
    Engwall E; Marthin O; Wase V; Sundström J; Mikhalev V; de Jong BA; Langendijk JA; Melbéus H; Andersson B; Korevaar EW; Both S; Bokrantz R; Glimelius L; Fredriksson A
    Med Phys; 2023 Sep; 50(9):5723-5733. PubMed ID: 37482909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimal minimum MU for intensity-modulated proton therapy with pencil-beam scanning proton beams.
    Yi B; Mossahebi S; Jatczak J; Mundis M; Houser T; Alicia D; Han D; Gonzalez R; Olis S; Zakhary M
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Sep; 25(9):e14435. PubMed ID: 38922754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Statistical evaluation of worst-case robust optimization intensity-modulated proton therapy plans using an exhaustive sampling approach.
    Yang Z; Li H; Li Y; Li Y; Chang Y; Li Q; Yang K; Wu G; Sahoo N; Poenisch F; Gillin M; Zhu XR; Zhang X
    Radiat Oncol; 2019 Jul; 14(1):129. PubMed ID: 31324257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.