151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37974385)
1. Is noncoplanar plan more robust to inter-fractional variations than coplanar plan in treating bilateral HN tumors with pencil-beam scanning proton beams?
Yi B; Jatczak J; Deng W; Poirier YP; Yao W; Witek ME; Molitoris JK; Zakhary MJ; Zhang B; Biswal NC; Ferris MJ; Mossahebi S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 25(2):e14186. PubMed ID: 37974385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Integrated beam orientation and scanning-spot optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy for brain and unilateral head and neck tumors.
Gu W; O'Connor D; Nguyen D; Yu VY; Ruan D; Dong L; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 45(4):1338-1350. PubMed ID: 29394454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of robust treatment planning on single- and multi-field optimized plans for proton beam therapy of unilateral head and neck target volumes.
Cubillos-Mesías M; Baumann M; Troost EGC; Lohaus F; Löck S; Richter C; Stützer K
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Nov; 12(1):190. PubMed ID: 29183377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robust beam orientation optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy.
Gu W; Neph R; Ruan D; Zou W; Dong L; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 46(8):3356-3370. PubMed ID: 31169917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Investigating the utilization of beam-specific apertures for the intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) head and neck cancer plans.
Rana S; Storey M; Manthala Padannayil N; Shamurailatpam DS; Bennouna J; George J; Chang J
Med Dosim; 2021 Summer; 46(2):e7-e11. PubMed ID: 33246881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance evaluation of adaptive aperture's static and dynamic collimation in a compact pencil beam scanning proton therapy system: A dosimetric comparison study for multiple disease sites.
Grewal HS; Ahmad S; Jin H
Med Dosim; 2021 Summer; 46(2):179-187. PubMed ID: 33279369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Spot scanning proton arc therapy reduces toxicity in oropharyngeal cancer patients.
de Jong BA; Battinelli C; Free J; Wagenaar D; Engwall E; Janssens G; Langendijk JA; Korevaar EW; Both S
Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 50(3):1305-1317. PubMed ID: 36373893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing proton treatment plans of pediatric brain tumors in two pencil beam scanning nozzles with different spot sizes.
Kralik JC; Xi L; Solberg TD; Simone CB; Lin L
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 16(6):41-50. PubMed ID: 26699553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Feasibility and robustness of dose painting by numbers in proton therapy with contour-driven plan optimization.
Barragán AM; Differding S; Janssens G; Lee JA; Sterpin E
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):2006-17. PubMed ID: 25832091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Small spot size versus large spot size: Effect on plan quality for lung cancer in pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Rana S; Rosenfeld AB
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Feb; 23(2):e13512. PubMed ID: 34989458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiple-CT optimization: An adaptive optimization method to account for anatomical changes in intensity-modulated proton therapy for head and neck cancers.
Yang Z; Zhang X; Wang X; Zhu XR; Gunn B; Frank SJ; Chang Y; Li Q; Yang K; Wu G; Liao L; Li Y; Chen M; Li H
Radiother Oncol; 2020 Jan; 142():124-132. PubMed ID: 31564553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of single-energy proton pencil beam scanning Bragg peak for intensity-modulated proton therapy FLASH treatment planning in liver-hypofractionated radiation therapy.
Wei S; Lin H; Shi C; Xiong W; Chen CC; Huang S; Press RH; Hasan S; Chhabra AM; Choi JI; Simone CB; Kang M
Med Phys; 2022 Oct; 49(10):6560-6574. PubMed ID: 35929404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Noncoplanar VMAT for nasopharyngeal tumors: Plan quality versus treatment time.
Wild E; Bangert M; Nill S; Oelfke U
Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2157-68. PubMed ID: 25979010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of organ-at-risk sparing and plan robustness for spot-scanning proton therapy and volumetric modulated arc photon therapy in head-and-neck cancer.
Barten DL; Tol JP; Dahele M; Slotman BJ; Verbakel WF
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6589-98. PubMed ID: 26520750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of Fully Automated Robust Multicriterial Treatment Planning for Head and Neck Cancer IMPT.
Huiskes M; Kong W; Oud M; Crama K; Rasch C; Breedveld S; Heijmen B; Astreinidou E
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2024 Jul; 119(3):968-977. PubMed ID: 38284961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantification of plan robustness against different uncertainty sources for classical and anatomical robust optimized treatment plans in head and neck cancer proton therapy.
Cubillos-Mesías M; Troost EGC; Lohaus F; Agolli L; Rehm M; Richter C; Stützer K
Br J Radiol; 2020 Mar; 93(1107):20190573. PubMed ID: 31778315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy planning for head and neck cancers.
Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Park PC; Dong L; Ronald Zhu X; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051711. PubMed ID: 23635259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Partitioning of discrete proton arcs into interlaced subplans can bring proton arc advances to existing proton facilities.
Engwall E; Marthin O; Wase V; Sundström J; Mikhalev V; de Jong BA; Langendijk JA; Melbéus H; Andersson B; Korevaar EW; Both S; Bokrantz R; Glimelius L; Fredriksson A
Med Phys; 2023 Sep; 50(9):5723-5733. PubMed ID: 37482909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Statistical evaluation of worst-case robust optimization intensity-modulated proton therapy plans using an exhaustive sampling approach.
Yang Z; Li H; Li Y; Li Y; Chang Y; Li Q; Yang K; Wu G; Sahoo N; Poenisch F; Gillin M; Zhu XR; Zhang X
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Jul; 14(1):129. PubMed ID: 31324257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pre-treatment analysis of non-rigid variations can assist robust intensity-modulated proton therapy plan selection for head and neck patients.
Zhang Y; Alshaikhi J; Amos RA; Tan W; Anaya VM; Pang Y; Royle G; Bär E
Med Phys; 2022 Dec; 49(12):7683-7693. PubMed ID: 36083223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
