148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37974385)
41. Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) interplay effect evaluation of asymmetric breathing with simultaneous uncertainty considerations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
Shan J; Yang Y; Schild SE; Daniels TB; Wong WW; Fatyga M; Bues M; Sio TT; Liu W
Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 47(11):5428-5440. PubMed ID: 32964474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Preliminary evaluation of multifield and single-field optimization for the treatment planning of spot-scanning proton therapy of head and neck cancer.
Quan EM; Liu W; Wu R; Li Y; Frank SJ; Zhang X; Zhu XR; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081709. PubMed ID: 23927306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. A Monte-Carlo study to assess the effect of 1.5 T magnetic fields on the overall robustness of pencil-beam scanning proton radiotherapy plans for prostate cancer.
Kurz C; Landry G; Resch AF; Dedes G; Kamp F; Ganswindt U; Belka C; Raaymakers BW; Parodi K
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Oct; 62(21):8470-8482. PubMed ID: 29047455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Clinical implementation of pencil beam scanning proton therapy for liver cancer with forced deep expiration breath hold.
Fracchiolla F; Dionisi F; Righetto R; Widesott L; Giacomelli I; Cartechini G; Farace P; Bertolini M; Amichetti M; Schwarz M
Radiother Oncol; 2021 Jan; 154():137-144. PubMed ID: 32976870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. An Analysis of Plan Robustness for Esophageal Tumors: Comparing Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Plans and Spot Scanning Proton Planning.
Warren S; Partridge M; Bolsi A; Lomax AJ; Hurt C; Crosby T; Hawkins MA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 May; 95(1):199-207. PubMed ID: 27084641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Robustness of IMPT treatment plans with respect to inter-fractional set-up uncertainties: impact of various beam arrangements for cranial targets.
Hopfgartner J; Stock M; Knäusl B; Georg D
Acta Oncol; 2013 Apr; 52(3):570-9. PubMed ID: 23244675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. A comprehensive dosimetric study of Monte Carlo and pencil-beam algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy for breast cancer.
Liang X; Li Z; Zheng D; Bradley JA; Rutenberg M; Mendenhall N
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 20(1):128-136. PubMed ID: 30488548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Treatment planning for radiotherapy with very high-energy electron beams and comparison of VHEE and VMAT plans.
Bazalova-Carter M; Qu B; Palma B; Hårdemark B; Hynning E; Jensen C; Maxim PG; Loo BW
Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2615-25. PubMed ID: 25979053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Modeling the dosimetry of organ-at-risk in head and neck IMRT planning: an intertechnique and interinstitutional study.
Lian J; Yuan L; Ge Y; Chera BS; Yoo DP; Chang S; Yin F; Wu QJ
Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 40(12):121704. PubMed ID: 24320490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Exploratory Study of 4D versus 3D Robust Optimization in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Lung Cancer.
Liu W; Schild SE; Chang JY; Liao Z; Chang YH; Wen Z; Shen J; Stoker JB; Ding X; Hu Y; Sahoo N; Herman MG; Vargas C; Keole S; Wong W; Bues M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 May; 95(1):523-533. PubMed ID: 26725727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Development and long-term stability of a comprehensive daily QA program for a modern pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy delivery system.
Rana S; Bennouna J; Samuel EJJ; Gutierrez AN
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 20(4):29-44. PubMed ID: 30920146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Evaluation of Robustness to Setup and Range Uncertainties for Head and Neck Patients Treated With Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy.
Malyapa R; Lowe M; Bolsi A; Lomax AJ; Weber DC; Albertini F
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 May; 95(1):154-162. PubMed ID: 27084638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Technical note: Does the greater power of pencil beam scanning reduce the need for a proton gantry? A study of head-and-neck and brain tumors.
Yan S; Depauw N; Adams J; Gorissen BL; Shih HA; Flanz J; Bortfeld T; Lu HM
Med Phys; 2022 Feb; 49(2):813-824. PubMed ID: 34919736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. A Beam-Angle-Selection Method to Improve Inter-Fraction Motion Robustness for Lung Tumor Irradiation With Passive Proton Scattering.
Zhang Y; Ho MW; Li Z
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2020; 19():1533033820948052. PubMed ID: 32844716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Impact of Spot Size and Beam-Shaping Devices on the Treatment Plan Quality for Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy.
Moteabbed M; Yock TI; Depauw N; Madden TM; Kooy HM; Paganetti H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 May; 95(1):190-198. PubMed ID: 27084640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Relative plan robustness of step-and-shoot vs rotational intensity-modulated radiotherapy on repeat computed tomographic simulation for weight loss in head and neck cancer.
Thomson DJ; Beasley WJ; Garcez K; Lee LW; Sykes AJ; Rowbottom CG; Slevin NJ
Med Dosim; 2016; 41(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 26993081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Prospective MRI-based imaging study to assess feasibility of proton therapy for post-prostatectomy radiation.
Swisher-McClure S; Yin L; Rosen M; Batra S; Berman AT; Both S; Vapiwala N
Acta Oncol; 2016 Jul; 55(7):828-33. PubMed ID: 27145164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Beam mask and sliding window-facilitated deep learning-based accurate and efficient dose prediction for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Zhang L; Holmes JM; Liu Z; Vora SA; Sio TT; Vargas CE; Yu NY; Keole SR; Schild SE; Bues M; Li S; Liu T; Shen J; Wong WW; Liu W
Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):1484-1498. PubMed ID: 37748037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Impact of Multiple Beams on Plan Quality, Linear Energy Transfer Distribution, and Plan Robustness of Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Lung Cancer.
Shang H; Pu Y; Chen Z; Wang X; Yuan C; Jin X; Liu C
ACS Sens; 2021 Feb; 6(2):408-417. PubMed ID: 33125211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. A method for evaluation of proton plan robustness towards inter-fractional motion applied to pelvic lymph node irradiation.
Andersen AG; Casares-Magaz O; Muren LP; Toftegaard J; Bentzen L; Thörnqvist S; Petersen JB
Acta Oncol; 2015; 54(9):1643-50. PubMed ID: 26203931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
